Preview

Response To 'Ten Indians' By Joseph Campbell, A Cultural Anthropology

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1547 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Response To 'Ten Indians' By Joseph Campbell, A Cultural Anthropology
Seventh Assignment
Task 1: Review the Assignment 7 Lecture. Restate its lesson. Use no fewer than 50 words. Joseph Campbell, a cultural anthropologist, recognizes an arrowhead as the oldest piece of art created by humans since it preserves beauty. It is reduced to one point, “Its material composition is harmonized, singularized, and elegantly articulated towards a purpose” (Hicks L7). While writing you should follow the form of an arrowhead, you should start on a wide path that slowly tapers into a narrow gate. In your writing you would introduce ideas that lead to a specific assertion, a thesis. Similar to King Kong, we find that beauty is a master force. The arrowhead overcomes savagery by killing it.

Task 2: Listen to “Ten Indians”
…show more content…
The freed prisoner would hurt as he looked around the cave and found a great light from fire. The prisoner would be in greater shock and pain when he discovered the world outside the cave. As he overcomes shock as well a pain, he would discover that his former view of reality was wrong. He would find beauty, color, and form. He might be sad by finding all these things because it would make his past life meaningless. As many people do when they discover something new, the freed prisoner would go back and share with the other two prisoners. He finds that he is no longer used to the darkness and shadows. Plato suggests that the prisoners would reject him, “And would they not let him know that he had gone up but, only in order to come back down into the cave with his eyes ruined -- and thus it certainly does not pay to go up” (5). He also suggests that they would reject him even to the point of …show more content…
He identifies a viscous cycle of break down and rebirth of each government form over time, hence the name “The Circle of Government”. He identifies each opposite form of government: tyranny, oligarchy, and licentiousness. He continues by identifying how a monarchy could turn into a tyranny through the heredity line. “But when they began to make sovereignty hereditary and non-elective, the children quickly degenerated from their fathers; and, so far from trying to equal their virtues…” (Machiavelli 1). He thought that the children of the king would focus on living a rich life instead of one that focused on politics. He goes on to describe this as an aristocracy, where few noblemen would be in charge chasing the things they desired. They would seek riches and power by the form of violence, the people would quickly be disgusted with the oligarchy and overthrow the government to form a popular government. Machiavelli described a democratic government as, “…bearing in mind the past tyranny, they governed in strict accordance with the laws which they had established themselves; preferring public interests to their own, and to administer and protect with greatest care both public and private affairs” (2). After sometime the form of democracy would spiral into licentiousness. “Each individual only consulted his own passions, and a thousand acts of

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    On page nine of,“The Historical Paradox of the American Indian Anthropologist”, Norcini writes about how Louis Shortridge, a Tlingit museum employee, felt guilty about obtaining a shark helmet for the University of Pennsylvania Museum. Obtaining the helmet in the 1930’s, Shortridge was proud of his culture and modern achievement yet felt like a traitor. Is it possible that Shortridge was pressured by the museum to obtain the object? Or did he put it in the museum by his own will? Did other Tlingits or members of the Kaguanton clan did not like the helmet in the museum and make him feel social pressure? This incident was almost one hundred years ago- how has relationships between Native American museum employees and their museum as well as tribe…

    • 225 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Machiavelli believes that a government should be very structured, controlled, and powerful. He makes it known that the only priorities of a prince are war, the institutions, and discipline. His writings describes how it is more important for a prince to be practical than moral. This is shown where he writes, "in order to maintain the state he is often obliged to act against his promise, against charity, against humanity, and against religion" (47). In addition, Machiavelli argues that a prince may have to be cunning and deceitful in order to maintain political power. He takes the stance that it is better for the prince to be feared than loved. His view of how a government should run and his unethical conduct are both early signs of dictatorship.…

    • 514 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Contrary to popular belief, Machiavelli is not a diabolic political figure in search of power. He is instead an astute politician who uses his extensive knowledge of politics to analyze various princes and principalities in order to educate future…

    • 931 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Machiavelli's The Prince, hints of future democratic theories can be pulled out of Machiavelli's plan for the success of a prince of a state. Within Machiavelli's concentration of plotting out successful achievement of a stabilized state within a principality, he often reveals the importance of the satisfaction the people within the governing walls of that principality. One of the themes to Machiavelli's plan included the dismissal of the affection of virtue of the nobility as well as the significance of an honest people. Even though Machiavelli may have had other motivation for the writing of "The Prince",…

    • 1215 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    “Roma and Julie: Indians in Duality” talks about an intense quarrel between two Native American couples. The woman in the story (Julie), asks the man (Roma) a set of questions about her identity and their future. Differences between the white and Native American culture causes the exhaustion in her life and confusion of real selves, a white-self and an Indian-self. For instance, Julie is a…

    • 1266 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Machiavelli felt it was best to be feared, not loved. He believed that if you trusted others, they would eventually disobey you. In his book The Prince, Machiavelli wrote, “For all men in general this observation may be made: they are ungrateful, fickle, and deceitful, eager to avoid dangers, and avid for gain, and while you are useful to them they are all with you, but when it [danger] approaches they turn on you. Any prince, trusting only in their works and having no other preparations made, will fall to ruin, for friendships that are bought at a price and not by greatness and nobility of soul are paid for indeed, but they are not owned and cannot be called upon in time of need. Men have less hesitation in offending a man who is loved than one who is feared, for love is held by a bond of obligation which, as men are wicked, is broken whenever personal advantage suggests it, but fear is accompanied by the dread of punishment, which never relaxes”. Machiavelli is saying that most men are afraid and with fear you forget your responsibilities, and since most men were afraid of the consequences of voting, they would theoretically run away. He believed absolutism was the way to go because in a democracy, all men would be controlling.…

    • 739 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Machiavelli’s The Prince, he tackles of issues in society and the government as a whole. Machiavelli believed a good ruler is one that could give justice and provide some type of order to his citizens. He believed that a good ruler should focus more on the present rather than what could be. Machiavelli used several examples to demonstrate his way of thinking in a humanistic way and running a government. He used the fox and the lion for an example. A good ruler should be able to use cunningness and brute force per situation in which it is called for. Machiavelli believes that there are two ways of fighting something, that is by law or by force and he believed those are…

    • 760 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Overall, Machiavelli shows that in order to be an effective prince, one must disregard the morality of one’s actions in certain times for the welfare of the state. This strong belief shows that Machiavelli’s best interests are in the state and not in the general population. Because he…

    • 358 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Machiavelli's philosophy was that "The end justifies the means." This meant that the end result is the most important, and how you got there was of no importance. The Prince was a book of advice to rules on how to found a state and how to stay in power. Machiavelli explained in his book the many different ways to gain power. One way was to acquire land. The four methods that he discusses to acquire more land is: Your own arms and virtue, fortune, others' arms, and inequity. To Machiavelli, the word virtue meant manliness and strength. Machiavelli also advocates the use of evil to achieve any goals. He gives an example of Agathocles of Syracuse as a proof that this works and will enable the prince to rule the land peacefully through fear. "Born of a potter, this one always had an iniquitous life throughout his years: nonetheless, he accomplished his iniquities with such virtue of spirit and of body that, having joined the militia, he rose through its ranks to become praetor of Syracuse. Being established in rank, and having decided to become prince and to keep with violence and without obligation to others what had been conceded him by agreement... ...one morning he convened the people and the senate of Syracuse, as if he had had to deliberate things pertinent to the republic; and at a preordained nod…

    • 1540 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Machiavelli's the Prince

    • 1252 Words
    • 6 Pages

    "The state is the highest achievement of man, a progressive and elaborate creation of his free will. The individual, the leader, the people, cooperate in maintaining it." This idea of state was put forth by Niccolo Machiavelli in The Prince, which was in essence a ruler's handbook to governing and maintaining his land. Machiavelli conjured his theories for government by basing his ideas in his belief that men, especially men in power, tend to follow the same directions, and therefore by looking at past leaders and their follies we can better determine how to run a state. "Men are always the same and are animated by the same passions that lead them fatally to the same decisions, acts, an results…. That one can foresee the course of political development by mediating upon the cycles and phases of historical events, and that essential to a statesman is not only the experience of modern events and constant study of the past. But also the ability to exploit this knowledge in actual political actions."…

    • 1252 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Morals and values are passed down and taught to one through traditions, customs, and beliefs. However as these traditions, customs, and beliefs are passed down they are altered through each generation. Native americans and other cultures lose a bit of themselves every year through the influence of western culture. Western culture not only influences traditions and customs but also devalues the importance of the cultures. Through the ignorance of today’s American society that we live in, the respect held for Native Americans and other cultures are fading day-by-day disrespecting them through selfish benefits. However, disregarding the loss of culture through the western culture, Native Americans put the effort to preserve…

    • 3071 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Plato, Machiavelli

    • 512 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Nicolo Machiavelli is known as being an realist who accepted that fact that humans are brutal, selfish, and fickle while Plato was an idealist who believed people could be ruled by a philosopher king who ruled over the warriors and tradesmen of his ideal republic with rationality. In his view the philosopher-king was in charge of making the state a "utopia" in that everyone had his/her place and all worked together for the common good of the state. Machiavelli said that this was a foolish idea. Machiavelli philosophy of government was centered on the ruler. He believed the king, or despot, had the right to do whatever was necessary for his own gain, or whatever the monarch considered the "good of the state" which he called Virtu’. Machiavelli believed the only purpose for a ruler was to make war, and protect its citizens from attacks by other states. He advocated the slaughter of surrendered generals in order to crush hopes of revolution - even rationalizing that it was worth the risk of revolution should it anger the people. Machiavelli believed a ruler should be immoral using deception and illusion for power and never allowing the people to know the “real” him…

    • 512 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The returning prisoner is wanting to tell the other about there being another better world out there than just the cave. The newly educated of the outside cave, Socrates says “when he remembered his old habitation, and the wisdom of the den and his fellow-prisoners” (202) that being the main reason for the prisoner to return. The thing that prevent this individual from tell the others, the prisoner has been so use to the outside world the prisoner was blinded due to the change in different amount of light from outside of the cave. Socrates points out that people who return to their past life to tell the lower individuals are metaphorically blinded by thoughts of there being a better life. These individuals did have competitions in the cave to prove who is the most intelligent by seeing who could name the current and future images projected on the cave wall from the light source. As Socrates is teaching at glaucon is starting to shape that the path to enlightenment is different for everyone whether their enlightenment is realizing that nothing is better than the cave or that their is a potential for a better life outside of that cave they just have to find it. Socrates teaches plato that the journey to enlightenment is a way to get to better way of living than what each individual currently is in and to never return to their past life.…

    • 1306 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Allegory Of The Cave

    • 868 Words
    • 4 Pages

    One of the worlds well-known Philosophers once wrote an allegory within the book of The Republic. This Allegory goes by the name of The Allegory of the Cave. This lesson will show us the hierarchical view of reality and wisdom. Plato will describe the trials through the artifice and then insight into knowledge that is unknown to them. Plato begins this lesson as a deep cave that possesses prisoners inside, these prisoners have been there since birth and have seen nothing else but the cave they dwell in.…

    • 868 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Governments collapse due to revolutions and corruption. This is due to the flaws in those governments that give the people too much power. Niccolo Machiavelli’s idea of an absolute secular monarchy addresses these issues. The problems that people bring into politics are removed, and a king is put in place to make society flourish. Niccolo Machiavelli’s absolute secular monarchy is the ideal form of government because it prevents the selfish people of society from uprooting the government, provides people with security, and has self-insurances that prevent it from turning into a tyranny.…

    • 812 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays