Preview

Response to H.J. Mccloskey

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1654 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Response to H.J. Mccloskey
In his 1968 article, On Being an Atheist, H.J. McCloskey attempts to refute the arguments of God’s existence and explain how “atheism is a much more comfortable belief than theism.” (McCloskey 1968) He first attempts to discredit the Cosmological and Teleological arguments for God’s existence, then he turns to the existence of evil as “proof” that God does not exist, and finally closes his article back where he began- claiming that atheism is a more comforting belief than theism. Here I intend to explain how McCloskey is incorrect in his arguments and beliefs. McCloskey actually changes the “arguments for” God’s existence to “proofs of” God’s existence. He claims that the individual “proofs” cannot provide a definite proof of God’s strength, security, or existence. (McCloskey 1968) I first want to argue his claim but stating that theists do not claim to prove God’s existence, theists argue for God’s existence with the cumulative case approach. Taking all of the possible explanations regarding the universe, design of the universe, and moral values theists find that God is the best explanation. A common example of this approach (the best explanation), as given in the Approaching the Question of God 's Existence presentation, is in the field of science regarding magnetic fields. Scientists have no empirical evidence that the magnetic field exists but it is the best explanation for the way magnets behave the way they do; just as a personal, moral (moral argument), intelligent (teleological argument) creator (cosmological argument) of the universe is the best explanation for the universe we experience. McCloskey attempts to dismantle the cosmological argument, the argument of existence, by claiming the “mere existence of the world constitutes no reason for believing in such a being [i.e. a necessarily existing being].” (McCloskey 1968) However, the universe is contingent -which means all of the objects within it do exist but might easily have not existed. (Evans


Bibliography: Craig, William Lane. "The Absurdity of Life without God." Reasonable Faith: Christian Truth and Apologetics, 2008, 3rd ed. Evans, C. Stephen, and R. Zachary Manis. Philosophy of Religion: Thinking about Faith. 2nd. Downers Grove, IL: IVP Academic, 2009. McCloskey, H. J. "On Being an Atheist." Question One, February 1968: 62-69.
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Clifford on the Immorality of Religious Belief Without Evidence
    • 566 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Clifford on the Immorality of Religious Belief Without Evidence

    We are looking for evidence god exists, so we turned to an evidential argument in favor of God: the cosmological argument.…

    • 566 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    My Response to Mccloskey's "On Being an Atheist"
    • 2632 Words
    • 11 Pages

    My Response to Mccloskey's "On Being an Atheist"

    The paper written by McCloskey is nothing more than an Atheists attempt to justify his atheistic ideas and at no time should ever be taken by any other person as anything more than one man’s opinions which are based completely upon speculative ideas. Throughout this paper, I read statements like, “theists feel…”,” Most theists believe…”, “They do not think…”, and “Most theists conclude…”; however, the person giving these tidbits is only one person, as opposed to the “most” which he seems to speak for, and he is no more a “theist”, than the “man in the moon”. I would be more inclined to over look his made-up statistics, had a single one of his claims lined up with my theistic ideas; however, every time he claimed to know how the “theists” think or feel, it turned out to be the opposite of my theistic point of view. The very basis for this fallacy can be tied to a statement in McCloskey’s opening sentence: “…the grounds upon which theists base their belief in God…” In this statement, McCloskey claims to know why theists believe in God. My next claim is pure speculation; however, if I were to ask every person in my church congregation, “why do you believe in God”, I seriously doubt anyone would respond with the cosmological argument or the teleological argument.…

    • 2632 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Response To Mccloskey's 'On Being An Atheist'
    • 1548 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Response To Mccloskey's 'On Being An Atheist'

    McCloskey claims that the “mere existence of the world constitutes no reason for believing in such a being.” He goes on to state that because there are beings in the universe that do not have any explanation for their existence, one can infer that there must be some “ultimate” being responsible. The original cause of being is necessary because contingency cannot be infinite. The cosmological argument is the basis for why we may question the existence of anything, but it is not a sufficient enough answer to the bigger question of an all-powerful ultimate…

    • 1548 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Summary: The Scientific Revoution
    • 2158 Words
    • 9 Pages

    Summary: The Scientific Revoution

    Wertheim, Margaret. "PBS Faith and Reason." PBS Faith and Reason. Prod. Ronald Bailey. PBS. 11 Sept. 1998. PBS. PBS. Web. 18 Nov. 2013.…

    • 2158 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    William Clifford The Ethics Of Belief
    • 779 Words
    • 4 Pages

    William Clifford The Ethics Of Belief

    Argumentative Essay on “The Ethics of Belief” PHIL 2641 Online – Section 001 February 13, 2008…

    • 779 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Mccloskey Argumentative Analysis
    • 1881 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Mccloskey Argumentative Analysis

    73 Evans, Manis). However the argument itself if just a mere introduction into what “God” is or rather who “God” might be. Evans and Manis hint to this in their final paragraph. McCloskey’s version of the argument is misguided in the notion that each individual argument is to be pulled apart singularly or that they cannot relate to form an over arching theme that “Gods” existence is dependent upon many facets. One may look to the “The Absurdity of Life Without God” article when defending this frame of view. That without “God” and the necessity of existence humanity is just a happy accident that is riddled with a meaningless purpose. Though personally the purpose of life and the existence of “God” are not relatable other than the fact they are ideas and existential questions asked only to attempt to “prove” the cause of unexplainable events or…

    • 1881 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Mccloskey's Argument For The Existence Of God
    • 484 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Mccloskey's Argument For The Existence Of God

    The cosmological argument argues the existence of God since there had to be a creator of all things in nature that depend on something else for their existence. McCloskey’s idea is that the existence of the universe is not enough to confirm the existence of God. An argument that can be used against this statement is the non-temporal form of the cosmological argument. In the book “Philosophy of Religion” by Evans and Manis, the non-temporal form has three components. First there is some contingent beings exist (Evans and Manis, 69). The second component is that if any contingent being exist then a significant being must exist (69). Third, there must be the existence of a significant being (69). Furthermore, the cause of the universe is necessary because is important because without that development then there would be not existence of the contingent beings. Another claim by McCloskey is that the cosmological argument “does not entitle us to postulate an all-powerful, all-perfect, uncaused cause”; this statement is not necessarily true. Since the world around McCloskey does exist there must be an ultimate creator who created the universe and this creator is…

    • 484 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Mccloskey Argument Analysis
    • 1490 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Mccloskey Argument Analysis

    They break down their argument into three different components, “Some contingent beings exist. If any contingent beings exist, then a necessary being must exist. Therefore there exists a necessary being” (Pg. 70). They explain that an infinite series is evidence to prove the contingent being exists. This presents an idea that there is no final explanation to this cause. To argue the statement by some atheist that claim that the world has always existed, they say that they do not make any claims about how old the universe which explains a universe that may have always…

    • 1490 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Response Paper
    • 1586 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Response Paper

    In 1968, a article was published by a man named H.J. McCloskey called “On Being an Atheist”, in which an attempt to present arguments against the existence of God is made. In his work, McCloskey attempts to provide readers with the argument that atheism is more “reasonable and comfortable (McCloskey,1968)” compared to the alternative theistic view. In his article, McCloskey attempts to make arguments against the three typical theistic proofs of God which includes the cosmological and teleological arguments, along with the argument from design. McCloskey uses the existence of evil and the irrationalness off faith against the theistic view of God. At the beginning of the article it seems that an intriguing argument will be made regarding the theistic view point of God, yet as McCloskey continues the argument becomes more biased in attacking spiritual beliefs which questions his validity.…

    • 1586 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    response to Being an Atheist
    • 2161 Words
    • 9 Pages

    response to Being an Atheist

    In fact McCloskey places the bar even lower by referring to the “proofs of” rather than “arguments for” God’s existence, thereby overstating the Theist’s claim. With respect to the “proofs” for God’s existence that McCloskey attempts to deal with, namely the Cosmological and Teleological Arguments, McCloskey offers trivial objections that are easily answered. With respect to arguments for God’s non-existence, McCloskey offers the logical form of the problem of evil which, while rich in rhetoric, does not contain enough logic to necessitate its title. McCloskey ends his article with a pragmatic justification of Atheist, stating that Atheism is more comforting that Theism; a point that is stark in its irrelevance.…

    • 2161 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    The Cosmological Argument Analysis
    • 1190 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The Cosmological Argument Analysis

    The cosmological argument proves the existence of God. It discusses contingent beings which exist, but could not have existed and necessary beings which exist and could not not exist. The cosmological says that there is a contingent being that exists. The existence of a contingent being must have a cause and the contingent being cannot be the cause of itself. The complete cause of a contingent being includes only other contingent beings or it includes a necessary being. Contingent beings alone cannot be the complete cause of a contingent being. The complete cause of a contingent being must include a necessary being. Therefore, a necessary being must exist. The cosmological argument shows that there must be a higher power, and that higher power is God. Everything that exists on earth is a contingent being. There is no person or animal that is not contingent. But what created everything to begin with if a contingent being cannot be the only cause of another contingent being? Everything on earth has a cause, but there must be a necessary being being that caused the Earth. There has to be something other than contingent beings. There has to be a necessary being that started everything. That necessary being is…

    • 1190 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    On Being an Atheist
    • 1378 Words
    • 6 Pages

    On Being an Atheist

    Does the universe exist? If the universe exists, what caused it to exist? The universe itself could not have created or caused itself. If the cause or explanation for the universe is something other than itself, what is that cause. If the universe is a contingent being, did other contingent beings cause it or did a non-contingent being cause the universe? Something caused the universe to exist. There was a First Cause. This First Cause has no beginning and no end, it is eternal. What could possibly be powerful enough to create the universe with all of its complexity and depth if not God? To say that contingent things just exist with no cause does not explain why they exist. Can a contingent being give an explanation for how or why it exists? If not, it follows that the only explanation is a non-contingent being began the process. The Cosmological Argument is not meant to give exhaustive proof for the existence of God. It is just a piece of the pie that encourages a…

    • 1378 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Explaining the Validty of God's Existence
    • 864 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Explaining the Validty of God's Existence

    I believe that when we start believing in God is from birth. We are taught about god from day one until the day we die. My belief and I tell everybody that will listen to me that God is for real he created us and he takes care of us throughout our lives. When we start going to church at a young age and start to learn more about the bible we gather information on what God has done for us. This gains knowledge on what we are taught and gives us the facts of his existence and we should spread the word to people that did not have the privilege of going to church at the young age. These are the people that are hard to get to believe because they do not have the knowledge of God. The first question I will ask them is tell my why you do not believe in god. Their answer is usually no one has ever seen him. And my response is who do you think created us. This question usually makes them to stop and think for a minute and they seem to believe me more and more.…

    • 864 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Martin Luther Justification
    • 3294 Words
    • 14 Pages

    Martin Luther Justification

    Justification means that God declares us righteous by his grace.[1] Historically, this issue was started when Martin Luther separated from the Roman Catholic Church.[2] Martin Luther 's understanding of justification was one of the main dividing points in the record of Christian theology. In his production of the German New Testament in 1521 his translation of Romans 3:28 was, “Therefore we conclude that a man is justified by faith alone without the deeds of the law.”[3] This interpretation and the emphasis on the word “alone” was to cause a conflict with Catholic doctrinal views on the issue and an essential rift in doctrine. The reaction to the doctrine of “faith alone” or Sola fide from the Catholic Church was in the extreme. “Great abuse was piled upon both Luther and his doctrine because of this single word, alone. He was accused of falsifying the Scriptures, of adding to the Bible, and of destroying the historic faith of the Catholic Church. For Rome and its authoritative magisterium this settled it—Martin Luther was a heretic! He plainly added to the dogma of Christ!”[4]…

    • 3294 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Philosophy Response Paper
    • 1264 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Philosophy Response Paper

    In McCloskey's article he states that "the mere existence of the world constitutes no reason for believing in such a being."{1} This appears to be his main issue with the cosmological argument. But Evans and Manis discuss a non-temporal form of the cosmological argument. They break down the non-temporal form into three different parts. The first one being that some contingent beings exist. Secondly, if any contingent beings exist, then a necessary being must exist. And thirdly, a necessary being does exist. I feel that they realize the issue that the absolute reoccurring of evidence proves a contingent being exists might give the idea that there is not a definitive reason to the cause. The cause of the universe is necessary because the cause is God, and God's existence is what is uncaused and absolute.…

    • 1264 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More

Related Topics