I appreciated the commentary that political correctness has a downside that is hindering us from connecting with others. I think our current political climate is an excellent example of how we can use these scripts as weapons and a way to further polarize ourselves from one another. I also like the idea and agree that we need to teach people, and in this case employees, on how to handle diversity-related issues and manage them responsibly and professionally without ignoring them or stuffing them away. Where my concerns come up is that I think the scenarios in this article feel very white collar and also assume an open and possibly flat culture and organization. While I agree someone from a minority group might need to examine their own assumptions/reality, to put the burden and risk that this individual must come forward and start tackling some of these issues is not an easy ask in many environments. I also think not all individuals have meaningful networks they can tap into for support and I imagine not all environments will welcome this exploration at all in the first place. There is a level of risk-taking here that I think is still easier for a majority group to participate in. The scenarios presented also represented employees who seemed to be in experienced roles with a relatively equal level of power. How does this play out when a more junior employee is having this experience with their boss? What does this look like if English is a second language and articulating your reality is a challenge? To be fair to the article, there is discussion about leadership and the need for senior leadership to buy into the principles, get familiar with other social identities, create a safe culture, and model the behavior being asked. Without this in place, I doubt this learning could actualize in a meaningful way in any
I appreciated the commentary that political correctness has a downside that is hindering us from connecting with others. I think our current political climate is an excellent example of how we can use these scripts as weapons and a way to further polarize ourselves from one another. I also like the idea and agree that we need to teach people, and in this case employees, on how to handle diversity-related issues and manage them responsibly and professionally without ignoring them or stuffing them away. Where my concerns come up is that I think the scenarios in this article feel very white collar and also assume an open and possibly flat culture and organization. While I agree someone from a minority group might need to examine their own assumptions/reality, to put the burden and risk that this individual must come forward and start tackling some of these issues is not an easy ask in many environments. I also think not all individuals have meaningful networks they can tap into for support and I imagine not all environments will welcome this exploration at all in the first place. There is a level of risk-taking here that I think is still easier for a majority group to participate in. The scenarios presented also represented employees who seemed to be in experienced roles with a relatively equal level of power. How does this play out when a more junior employee is having this experience with their boss? What does this look like if English is a second language and articulating your reality is a challenge? To be fair to the article, there is discussion about leadership and the need for senior leadership to buy into the principles, get familiar with other social identities, create a safe culture, and model the behavior being asked. Without this in place, I doubt this learning could actualize in a meaningful way in any