Rethinking the Cartesian Circle in Descartes' Meditation 5
Jerry Brow
Grindeland
7/16/2012
Rethinking the Cartesian Circle in Meditation 5 Now that I have had a chance to review my original essay, I’ve determined that my arguments for Descartes’ logic being circular were unclear because I believed something different from what I believe now. Though this revision will still address the same concepts from the Meditations as my previous essay, I will argue instead that Descartes’ argument for the existence of God is not guilty of circular logic but merely has the illusion of such. Descartes’ belief system for the existence of God consists of claims that seem to presuppose one another in defending their conclusions of each other, but instead, each follow from the Cogito as first principles. Other than the Cogito stating ‘so long as I continue to think I am something,’ which was determined to be a first principle in the First Meditations, another self-evident truth arises in the beginning of the Third Meditation that is a crucial antecedent for Descartes’ belief system regarding the existence of God. This first principle explicitly states that everything Descartes’ thinking being clearly and distinctly perceives is true. A few other important claims are made in the Third Mediation that are especially relevant to the Fifth Mediations, such as the claim that ideas considered alone in their own right cannot be outwardly false. Accounting for intuitive error, Descartes elaborates that even though ideas might have proceeded from things outside him, it does not follow that these ideas must resemble those outside things. An idea for a substance however, or something that exists in itself, has a greater objective reality than ideas without a substance, because it is more clear and distinct. It is from this foundation that Descartes’ idea of God is defined as, “a certain substance that is infinite, independent, supremely intelligent and supremely powerful.” When Descartes begins to acknowledge things outside of him, his
Grindeland
7/16/2012
Rethinking the Cartesian Circle in Meditation 5 Now that I have had a chance to review my original essay, I’ve determined that my arguments for Descartes’ logic being circular were unclear because I believed something different from what I believe now. Though this revision will still address the same concepts from the Meditations as my previous essay, I will argue instead that Descartes’ argument for the existence of God is not guilty of circular logic but merely has the illusion of such. Descartes’ belief system for the existence of God consists of claims that seem to presuppose one another in defending their conclusions of each other, but instead, each follow from the Cogito as first principles. Other than the Cogito stating ‘so long as I continue to think I am something,’ which was determined to be a first principle in the First Meditations, another self-evident truth arises in the beginning of the Third Meditation that is a crucial antecedent for Descartes’ belief system regarding the existence of God. This first principle explicitly states that everything Descartes’ thinking being clearly and distinctly perceives is true. A few other important claims are made in the Third Mediation that are especially relevant to the Fifth Mediations, such as the claim that ideas considered alone in their own right cannot be outwardly false. Accounting for intuitive error, Descartes elaborates that even though ideas might have proceeded from things outside him, it does not follow that these ideas must resemble those outside things. An idea for a substance however, or something that exists in itself, has a greater objective reality than ideas without a substance, because it is more clear and distinct. It is from this foundation that Descartes’ idea of God is defined as, “a certain substance that is infinite, independent, supremely intelligent and supremely powerful.” When Descartes begins to acknowledge things outside of him, his