Review of Against Work

During the class, the professor provided plenty of information and assignments for us. Because of this, I believe that I improve my English skills not only on the critical reading but also on the critical writing; by means of these two abilities, this week, I can utilize them on the paper included the content of analyzing the article “Against Work”. Consequently, in this paper, there are plenty of definitions of the article “Against Work” will be described as follows.

To begin with, the article “Against Work” was wrote by Christopher Clausen, according to the topic, it quite obvious that the content of the article is concerned with the idea of not working. Consequently, the author utilizes a number of examples, describing the reason, and analyzing the comparison in order to express the idea of not working effectively. When it comes to the construction, the author provides a general idea in the introduction and therefore he describes the argument with the special term and comparison; then, he describes his experience of working at Heart Institute so that he can assert another argument. In the rest part, he utilizes plenty of remarkable sayings in order to support his idea and makes a conclusion. In my opinion, I consider that the author constructs his article successfully, since he offers the readers a general idea in the beginning, utilizing the example and evidence to support his argument in the body part; nevertheless, I think the conclusion is not as good as the beginning and body part, because the author does not assert his argument strongly in the conclusion so as to enforce his opinion. Although I didn’t speak highly of the conclusion, the article is still a remarkable one, because the frame of the article is like a funnel; it stars from extensive direction and goes to the significant argument progressively. Therefore, by means of the construction, the readers can receive the author’s idea with success.

After discussing the construction, from the