Central question of the book: Why should presidents come to favor a strategy of leadership that appears so incompatible with the principles of pluralist theory? (p11)…
Ronald H. Nash begins his book responding the position of pluralism in regards to the exclusivity of Jesus Christ, mainly directed at John Hick, who was a leading proponent of pluralism until his death earlier this year. Nash was an evangelical Baptist theologian and apologist, who subscribed to the Calvinist tradition. Within his book, Nash tackles several of Hick’s arguments relating to the pluralism and universality of Christianity. Nash reveals in chapters 1-6, the evolution of Hick’s philosophy of pluralism and understanding of pluralism, which conflicts with the Christian’s view of the exclusivity Jesus Christ. Nash’s views within his book are orthodox and consistent with a reformed understanding of Christian Theology. The first six chapters of Nash’s book create an argument against pluralism, however, if the reader does not possess a basic understanding of theology or philosophy the material used by Nash can be difficult to understand.…
APOL 104 is designed to deepen and broaden the student’s understanding of the core fundamentals of the Biblical/Christian Worldview, and to equip the student to present that view in the face of competing worldviews. The goal is to enable students to think more clearly and critically about Christianity and truth. It is also the goal to equip Christians to become more effective witnesses and participate more constructively in the larger socio-cultural debate. In order to accomplish this goal, we must (1) understand the essentials of Christian truth, (2) understand the historical opponents to Christianity and truth, and (3) present a biblical, logical, and reasonable defense of Christianity. Through studying worldviews, students can better understand the nature of humanity and individual conduct so that they are prepared to address relevant questions in a culture of relativism. As the apostle Paul states, “Know how you should respond to each person who asks us about such things” Col. 4:6 (NASB). By understanding worldviews, one acquires a powerful form of wisdom that characterized the sons of Issachar, “men who understood the times, with knowledge of what Israel should do.” 1 Chron.12:32 (NASB).…
Since the beginning of mankind, man has sought some form of a higher entity and a basis for humanity. Since the beginning, it has always been important to find a greater purpose for human life--to discover life’s meaning. Naturally, due to cultural differences, incongruities arose in man’s interpretation of how best to live and how best to be faithful, and eventually man focused more on those differences rather than the similar theme that was emphasized in each of the Holy Books: to love our neighbors and to love God, or whatever higher entity we chose to worship (Interview). As time progressed, these differences in opinion began to become forms of identification, and man began to use faith and religion to distinguish themselves from one another.…
Same doctrines, different messages by different Christian churches – a reality that leads to erroneous doctrines.…
There were two examples of this. The first one being about the school that had “International Day” where different races, ethnic groups, and cultures could rejoice and demonstrate their homeland’s culture. The school, which was predominantly white, accepted this ethnic variation within their school’s society and let different ethnic groups have the main stage in their school for the day - something that does not happen very often. Another example of pluralism was the bars and clubs where the Vietnamese and also Hispanic people attended. They were able to dance and practice their culture’s customs at a location within a white community. It was accepted by the people of the community and many of the people who did not belong to that culture found it exciting and fun to see foreign groups demonstrating their…
Dr. Carson was invited to speak to students a school in Chicago. Before he spoke, Dr. Carson attended a reception where many different school officials and religious leaders told him about the troubled school that he was going to speak at. All the rumors caused the doctor to worry about the welcome he would receive from students. When he walked into the auditorium of the school his worries vanished as students applauded, and cheered for their guest speaker. For his speech, Dr. Carson told a story about being seen as cool or being seen as a nerd. It started with the cool guy having a nice car, a beautiful girlfriend, a varsity jacket, and what seemed like the perfect and ideal life. Then there was the nerd riding on the bus with an armful of books and a very low social status. After a few years, the cool guy did not do well in school and ends up working at a fast-food restaurant while the nerd gets a scholarship and heads off to college. A few more years go by and the cool guy still works at the fast-food place and is still cool. The nerd finishes college and takes a job at a Fortune 500 company and gets contacts, some suits, and a new car. All the girls in his old neighborhood then want to know him, not the "cool"…
In today’s society especially in the United States of America there is a habit of pluralizing God. The God pluralizes by culture is different from the God known to Israel or the Christians. In ancient Rome man would refer to themselves as Gods, take for example Caesar who referred to himself as God and the savior of everyone within in his kingdom. In (Romans 5:12-14) Paul goes on to teach us that man’s take on life was then and is now totally different and opposite to God’s intentions. Due to the world being so ungodly my views are…
In “Problems and Promise in Pluralism,” Annalee R. Ward argues for academic freedom amongst communication scholars, and questions the separation of faith and life (1). Ward seeks to determine whether various denominations can have an “engagement of differences in creative ways” that allow for coexistence in scholarship (Eck 9). Does tolerance, hold the key to coexistence amongst various denominations? The author questions whether faith serves as a universal guideline for scholars’ lives and communication practices (2). Can a scholar maintain personal integrity and still taste the fruit of pluralism? Ward realizes the answers to these questions will face obstacles and roadblocks along the way. The first obstacle centers on the fact that most…
Pluralism is the best word to describe the landscape for many religions established here in America. Religions Pluralism have been possible from many centuries ago. It is still possible, we are dealing with many changes respecting of this, everyday. Maybe, some religions have not understood this fact, every religion must have their own space, there is any religion with the purpose to eradicate humanity if nobody decided to belong to one in specific. I consider, all the terrorist events that we are facing are the process in our way to adapt us to many…
CHRISTIANITY AND TRUTH: Worldviews - Christianity. (n.d.). Exploring Christianity. Retrieved October 22, 2011, from http://www.christianity.co.nz/truth6.htm…
Bibliography: [1] Bush L. Ross,; “What is Secularism” Southwestern Journal of Theology 26 No.2 (March 1, 1984): 5-14 ATLA Religion Database with ATLA serials (5)…
The second part of the paper will involve scrutinising Clark and Davies writings to reveal what arguments each author presents pertaining to secularisation, the evidence they provide, whether the evidence challenges existing ideas about the phenomenon, and how.…
The fundamental difference between Christianity and humanism is in their attitude toward the transcendent, toward what might be called the vertical dimension of existence. In the parlance of theology, Christianity is fundamentally theonomous, and humanism is autonomous. As we have already indicated, Christianity with its goal of the salvation of man, relies ultimately upon grace, whereas humanism with its goal of human maturity relies ultimately upon the intuition and ethical will of self-sufficient and independent human nature. It has often been asserted that Christianity is heteronomous and that the humanism that accepts Christianity must also become heteronomous by submitting to an authority “anterior, superior and exterior” to itself. In this connection, a very important distinction must be made, a distinction often overlooked by Roman Catholics and orthodox Protestants and also by many exponents of humanism. The Christian movement arose as a protest against heteronomy, i.e., as a protest against rabbinical legalism and the heteronomy of the Jewish law. It did not call men to the absolute obedience of any earthly authority, any institution, or any man. It confronted men with the necessity of recognizing the inbreaking kingdom of God through its herald, Jesus Christ, and also with the demand for a change of heart in order that this kingdom might be fulfilled. Both the heteronomy of…
Pluralist is about social groups meaning race, ethnicity, and religion. Things to do with those categories. The conflict perspective is an analytical perspective on social organization that holds that conflict is a fundamental aspect of social life and can never be fully resolved. The conflict perspective talks about hold different groups socially conflict with each other. Whether that be because they are a different race, or belong to a different religious group. The next two things have to do with the Marxist theory which is the political, economic, and social theories of Karl Marx including the belief that the struggle between social classes is a major force in history and that there should eventually be a society in which there are no classes.…