As previously stated, Carr uses over 30 personal pronouns in the first five paragraphs alone; however these drop off fast. By the seventh paragraph, Carr uses zero personal pronouns and for good reason. At this point the article, Carr has already established a sense camaraderie with the reader allowing him to present points to an open minded audience. Carr, however, brings back the use of personal pronouns in the last seven paragraphs of the piece; reestablishing that table-side feeling with the reader. It is with this bookended structure that Carr is able to pull in his reader, making them interested in his anecdotes and quirks before the hard facts, and then gently letting them go towards the end. Some might argue that the lack of personal pronouns in the middle of Carr’s article is the result of his frequent use of quotation; however the stark contrast is simply too much to write off as coincidence. The use of these pronouns at the beginning and at the end were very intentional, and without them Carr’s carefully articulated and very lengthy points would fall on deaf
As previously stated, Carr uses over 30 personal pronouns in the first five paragraphs alone; however these drop off fast. By the seventh paragraph, Carr uses zero personal pronouns and for good reason. At this point the article, Carr has already established a sense camaraderie with the reader allowing him to present points to an open minded audience. Carr, however, brings back the use of personal pronouns in the last seven paragraphs of the piece; reestablishing that table-side feeling with the reader. It is with this bookended structure that Carr is able to pull in his reader, making them interested in his anecdotes and quirks before the hard facts, and then gently letting them go towards the end. Some might argue that the lack of personal pronouns in the middle of Carr’s article is the result of his frequent use of quotation; however the stark contrast is simply too much to write off as coincidence. The use of these pronouns at the beginning and at the end were very intentional, and without them Carr’s carefully articulated and very lengthy points would fall on deaf