Top-Rated Free Essay
Preview

Rhetorical Analysis of Julius Caesar

Good Essays
611 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Rhetorical Analysis of Julius Caesar
Act 2 of Julius Caesar by William Shakespeare is when Brutus decides to assassinate Julius Caesar for the benefit of Rome. Through a monologue, Brutus explains why he believes Caesar should be killed. Although Brutus loves Caesar as a friend, he opposes the political system where only one director tyrannically reigns a country. Instead, he believes in a republic form of political system guided by the votes of senators. After Cassius started to convince Brutus into turning against Caesar, Brutus had been in agony, in between his patriotism for Rome and his friendship with Caesar. In this speech explaining his virtues and reasons for assassinating Caesar, he uses various rhetorical modes, such as logos, ethos and pathos.

In Brutus’s speech, he uses the rhetorical mode logos by saying “But ‘tis a common proof,/ That lowliness is young ambition’s ladder,/ Whereto the climberupward turns his face;/ But when he once attains the upmost round. (2.i.22-25)” This quote describes a common proof which to obtain power, a man might act humble, but when he actually is at the top, he betrays his supporters. This is an example of logos, because it is a maxim, where it is a common saying. It is a broad idea that is theoretical and abstract in language. This is very important, because here, Brutus is trying to convince and reassure himself, that killing his friend Caesar is right because it will benefit Rome. By saying the unstated truth about a two-faced man trying to gain authority, Brutus is reasoning out why the assassination is virtuous. Then, with this logos, he is planning out how to convince the others into murdering Caesar. The quote mentioned in Brutus’s speech appeals to the audience’s sense of logic and intellect. In Brutus’s monologue, he uses the rhetorical mode ethos by saying “I know no personal cause to spurn at him,/ But for the general. (2.i.11-12)” By informing the audience how he doesn’t have any personal emotions in him decision of killing Caesar, he is appealing his own sense of credibility. If one’s decision is made only from his own personal emotions, then it is highly unlikely that it is for the good of all. It is only possible that the decision is for himself. Therefore, people will think the decision is unfair. However, Brutus not only mentioned his lack of personal emotion for Caesar, but also emphasized how his decision is for the betterment of all people. Therefore, Brutus established a sense

of credibility that is created through his fairness and consideration of alternative views. In the speech, Brutus uses the rhetorical mode pathos by saying “Crown him that,/ And then, I grant, we put a sting in him,/ That at his will he may do danger with. (2.i.15-17)” He is trying to approach the audience with the feeling of a community within a country by using the word “we.” This gives the impression that the citizens of Rome have the choice whether to give Caesar the authority or not. This makes the people feel as if the future of Rome depends on their decision. Not only that, but by saying how Caesar might cause damage, the citizens become afraid that he really will and perhaps destroy their lives. Therefore, Brutus established an appeal to the audience’s emotions such as fear. By appealing to the audience and reassuring himself for wanting to assassinate Caesar, in his speech, Brutus uses three rhetorical modes logos, pathos and ethos. He appeals to the audience’s sense of logic and intellect, establishes a sense of credible character as the speaker, and appeals to the audience’s emotions.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    1.Why do Octavius and Mark Antony want to engage in a battle with Brutus and Cassius?…

    • 494 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    How far will one man go to get revenge on the people who did him wrong? This question is relevant because Antony is ready to take action on the conspirators to make them pay for what they have done. By using his own emotions, that now has gotten him one step close to getting revenge. Antony was very tactful by studying the psychological aspect of the commoners to sway them on his side. Also, Antony figured out ways to persuade the crowd by using fallacies, rhetorical devices, and appeals.…

    • 538 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Now, Shakespeare was a famous playwright of the time and it seemed logical for him to express his ideologies through his popular plays to comment on his society. Shakespeare was able to use scenes such as the Brutus vs. Antony orations to stress the conflicting ideals between truth and propaganda, as well as their effects on society. Shakespeare captures Brutus’s honesty when he states “I honour him; but as he was ambitious, I slew him” through his use of prose within the speech. Prose reveals to the audience of plebeians Brutus’ rational and logical thinking behind assassinating Caesar, to which he emphasised “not that I loved Caesar less, but I loved Rome more.” The way in which Brutus excuses his actions appears to be beneficiary to the population instead for his selfish purposes, as well as depicting Caesar as a negative influence to the Roman Empire. This is soon contradicted by Antony’s oration which was written in blank verse. The speech mocks as well as contrasts Brutus’ intentions implicitly though the repetition of “But Brutus is an honourable man” which follows conflicting contradictory statements. This depicts Antony’s oration skills as both more superior and authentic to Brutus’s speech as it exposes the contrast between higher and lower order rhetoric. Brutus’s and Antony’s orations, create a powerful…

    • 1383 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the eulogy at Caesar’s funeral, Marc Antony, close friend of Caesar and general, seems to claim that he believes that Marcus Brutus and the rest of the men involved with the death of Caesar are honorable men, but in actuality believes that Caesar was the only honorable man in the Senate who was always there for his country and brought prosperity to his country. He also claims to not want to get revenge on the murderers of Caesar, but in reality, the whole point of his speech was to turn the citizens of Rome against Brutus so that Caesar’s death will be avenged. He develops this claim by first creating ethos and pathos refuting Brutus’ excuse that Caesar was ambitious. Then, he emphasizes the grand betrayal of Brutus towards Caesar. Towards…

    • 251 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Brutus explained why it was only logical for Caesar to be stopped. Brutus portrayed Caesar’s death as a necessary evil. Brutus shows that he too loves Caesar, possibly more than the people, but Caesar has great potential to be a devastating tyrant. Antony uses the Logos to persuade the people as well. Antony uses the Logos method by showing the Romans Caesar’s will. The will persuades the citizens that Caesar cared very much for Rome and it’s citizens…

    • 419 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    devices in order to persuade Brutus, a senator and friend of Caesar, that Caesar is…

    • 488 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    As a tragic hero Brutus possesses a flaw of naivety. Brutus is too trusting in others, such as the conspirators. The conspirators believed that Caesar was too ambitious and that they should kill him for the good of Rome, themselves and for their own personal benefit. Brutus trusted that they were conspiring to kill him for the sake of Rome. (Quote). He was also naïve by letting Antony speak at Caesar’s funeral. Brutus believed that Antony would praise Caesar at his funeral and follow the rules that he was given. Brutus trusted him and by letting him speak Antony turned all the Romans against him. Antony sparked a civil war by convincing the Romans that the conspirators that they did wrong. Since Antony turned all the Romans against him, he…

    • 161 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    A highly-regarded politician and conspirator in ancient Rome, Brutus, in his funerary speech to Julius Caesar, effectively claims that the conspiracy killing of Caesar is justified. First, he supports this claim by asserting that if Caesar was still alive, he would eventually force the people of Rome to act like his slaves, like a true dictator. Brutus uses a rhetorical question to appeal to logos when stating, “Had you rather Caesar were living and die all slaves, than that Caesar were dead, to live all free men? (Shakespeare). This rhetorical question makes the audience think about how their lives would be if Caesar would continue to powerfully reign. Brutus compares them to the slaves of Caesar that work under his authority until death,…

    • 512 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Through the tragic play, The Tragedy of Julius Caesar, by William Shakespeare, inside shows multiple evidences of hidden examples of the use of imagery, tone and rhetorical devices. A small example of literature tools could be found inside of this short example from the play, it is enough to express all elements of literature to be found. Brutus discusses the impending future of Rome, if placed upon Julius Caesar’s hands, and attempts to be convincing of others to slay Julius with his rise of power, before he takes the crown, as Julius Caesar follows by his heart more than his brain, he deems Julius Caesar not worthy of taking control over Rome. The tone, imagery, and rhetorical devices used by Shakespeare inside of this small excerpt is supposed to be translated as to further the development of the plot, which all results back to how most of The Tragedy of Julius Caesar, pertains foreshadowing to a lot of chaos as a theme..…

    • 765 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Julius Caesar, by William Shakespeare, Marc Antony makes a speech to the people of Rome after the death of Julius Caesar. Through this speech, Shakespeare uses language techniques such as irony, repetition/tone, and figurative language to illuminate conflict between the citizens of Rome and Brutus.…

    • 467 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Shakespeare's Julius Caesar, Decius Brutus and Mark Antony, both Roman Senators, eulogize Julius Caesar, each using a different technique and approach. Brutus, in a somewhat arrogant, to the point, eulogy, attempts to sway the people. He justifies conspiring against Caesar by stating that Caesar's ambition would have hurt Rome. However, in Antony's eulogy, he focuses on Caesar's positive traits, and cunningly disproves Brutus' justification for killing Caesar. The fickle Romans waver between leaders, responding emotionally, rather than intellectually, to the orators.<br><br>Brutus seeks to explain why he conspired against Caesar. He begins his speech with "Romans, countrymen ...", appealing to their consciousness as citizens of Rome, who,…

    • 844 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    By bringing up elements of Roman history and true events involving Caesar, Brutus seeks to demonstrate that the assassination was a planned (Antony knew nothing about the assassination) action based on thought and facts. Antony, too, employs logos when he lists examples of Caesar's actions on behalf of all Roman citizens. Therefore, his willingness to share the spoils of war with the people and his establishing a reputation for Rome throughout the known world; even Brutus could not the truth in Antony's words. The will itself is also an example of logos. While Antony uses, the literal will to stir up the crowd's emotions, the contents of the will represent logical support for Antony's defense of…

    • 680 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Manipulation, in essence, is a timeless recurring theme not only in literature, but in our everyday life. William Shakespeare’s drama, The Tragedy of Julius Caesar, is saturated with rhetorical strategies. Brutus, Cassius, and Antony use their words throughout different parts of the play to sway other people’s opinions. Cassius’s persuasion is so powerful it leads to the death of Julius Caesar. Brutus is left with the repercussions of the assassination and has to speak to the Romans. Brutus and Antony go back-to-back speaking to the Romans using rhetorical strategies to explain their diverse views on the event. These three characters’ use of ethos, pathos, and logos was so compelling it persuaded the other people’s views, caused Caesar’s death,…

    • 940 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    rhetorical appeals

    • 363 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Brutus’s also said, “Had you rather Caesar were living, and die all slaves, that Caesar were dead, to live all free men?” which appeals to logos because his is making a logical statement that says Caesar’s death was for the best to Rome’s men freedom. At the end Brutus appeals pathos by saying, “who is there so vile that will not love his country? If any, speak; for him have I offended” Brutus tells the Roman citizen that Caesar deserved what he got because he was too ambitious and would eventually become a much powerful ruler and would make the romans his slave.…

    • 363 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    3. Give examples of the three persuasive techniques from either Antony’s or Brutus’s speech. (logos, pathos, and ethos)…

    • 430 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays

Related Topics