To begin with, sticking with one segment and explained it very well would help her speech to be strong. Instead of trying to focus on one segments and look at from every single direction and demonstrate her thoughts with someone from the audience, she talked about many cases and with situation that had been already proven which made her speech weak. Even when she talk, she was breathing while talking which made the audience to think that she was in hurry and tried to finish everything before her …show more content…
She was trying to summarize her book and somewhat I THOUGHT she was just trying to advertise her book instead of giving a step on how to spot a liar. Her speech was very critical and she had better stick with one segment that would benefit the audience on their life rather than giving a punch of very sensitive information that would make the audience to understand it in different way. She talk about a lot of different segments on her talk such as John Edwards, Bill Clinton, and the two mother which made her speech everywhere and difficult to follow. Even though every thing she was trying to get cross to her audience based on scientific research, using verity of sections and trying to explain in short time made her speech weak. In bill Clinton case, If Clinton did not admit having sexual relationship with Miss Lewinsky, Meyer would not be able to discover that he was a liar. In other word, after Clinton admit he was lying and it was a fact to everyone that he