Rhetorical Situation Analysis
A rhetorical situation is a situation that is modified by an issue, an audience, and a set of constraints, or limitations. Through this, you create a context that applies these three things in unison. The first part being an exigence, or issue. This is the main motivation of the discourse or situation that is likely to be desired to change. These contain the part of the rhetorical situation that might apply a question and cause the need for resolution. The second part, audience, are (at least in Bitzer’s scheme) is a real group of people that witness the exigence. They might be directly involved, or they might be bystanders. They might also be a group that has yet to form. They might also be the one’s who are desiring the resolution within
…show more content…
In his paper, the thing taking the place of the exigence would likely be the paper’s intent, which would be to inform the reader of rhetorical situations. Throughout the paper, the only “issue” given is perhaps the uninformed reader. They’re trying to resolve the issue of ignorance of this. Informing the reader is first and foremost the objective goal of this written article, and they try and obtain said goal by explaining each individual part of a rhetorical situation The audience will of course be the reader, along with the author and the people he cited. All of them are the witnesses to this writing, and they are a part of the learning experience for the reader. For the author, he experiences the situation from an outside perspective, being the giver of this information. The reader's experience this situation by being the one’s that the “issue” is directed at.The constraints of the paper are things such as lack of a speaking voice. You can only read the paper, and cannot hear anything such as tone, accents, or inflection on the words. They might have a different meaning depending on how someone reads it. The other issue is that there’s no way to expand on an idea. If, for instance, the reader misinterprets a statement made by the author, they can’t fix that mistake unless they can somehow track down
In his paper, the thing taking the place of the exigence would likely be the paper’s intent, which would be to inform the reader of rhetorical situations. Throughout the paper, the only “issue” given is perhaps the uninformed reader. They’re trying to resolve the issue of ignorance of this. Informing the reader is first and foremost the objective goal of this written article, and they try and obtain said goal by explaining each individual part of a rhetorical situation The audience will of course be the reader, along with the author and the people he cited. All of them are the witnesses to this writing, and they are a part of the learning experience for the reader. For the author, he experiences the situation from an outside perspective, being the giver of this information. The reader's experience this situation by being the one’s that the “issue” is directed at.The constraints of the paper are things such as lack of a speaking voice. You can only read the paper, and cannot hear anything such as tone, accents, or inflection on the words. They might have a different meaning depending on how someone reads it. The other issue is that there’s no way to expand on an idea. If, for instance, the reader misinterprets a statement made by the author, they can’t fix that mistake unless they can somehow track down