Preview

Richard Dawkins Memes

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1157 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Richard Dawkins Memes
Richard Dawkins idea of a meme was not created to explain religion. It was an idea that spread within a group of individuals. A meme is the cultural equivalent of a gene, hence the similar name, and it was meant to describe the way ideas are created and propagated throughout society. Ideas replicate themselves just like genes; that was the idea. He did use the religion or God as examples of successful memes, but the idea was much more than simply attacking religion. Dawkins wasn't as much an advocate against religion then as he is now, and his early contributions were very beneficial to the development of modern biology. Dawkins didn't invent viral, changing ideas, he came up with a pop-term for it to sell books. It explains nothing we didn't …show more content…
The collection is talking about the traits of a group rather than of components of the group; I think group selection can be a more useful framework. The thought the genes are people and people are selfish therefore genes must be selfish. The will to survive is strong in every living organism. So, it’s no surprise that people are selfish, why would they not be selfish, it’s an irrelevant statement. Another question that critics ask is why would one want to have their gene passed on to off spring? I love being able to recognize physical and personality traits that my son shares with me and other people in my family. It's fascinating and wonderful, but actually it's just a cool novelty compared to the joy of interacting with him, teaching him and watching him grow and develop new abilities. I'd say it's a source of much joy, but hardly a necessity. There's a pride angle too, but I think that might work both ways. I get a huge ego boost when I take him out in public because he's an unusually good looking kid, and people go a love to love on

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    HDFS 229 Exam 1 Study Guide

    • 2735 Words
    • 11 Pages

    Natural selection—from generation to generations, the traits that are in all creatures in the world, have been passed on…

    • 2735 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    James Patrick Holding’s article talks about how “demagogues” like Dawkins find it hard to believe that creationists’ views are accepted and the double standard shown by them in accepting a thesis. The author seems to be offended as indicated by how he can mention “a lengthy list of the insulting rhetoric Dawkins has heaped upon the creationists”. Holding questions the credibility of the beliefs supported by Dawkins, who seems to be raising doubts on the view point of the creationists because the view belongs to a minority alone. Holding believes that people like Dawkins rarely put an effort in researching a particular idea, but they add those beliefs in their “agenda” only if it proves to be beneficial for them. The readers get the hint of irony that Holding tries to convey through his article that even though Dawkins supports the ‘Christ myth’ through his actions, he happens to give a statement of how there is a possibility of the existence of Jesus. The mockery in the article is pretty obvious as first Dawkins is said to have worked in a film called “The God Who Wasn’t There” – a film that supports the idea of how Jesus did not even exist at all. The author further mentions how the “Christ Myth” remains unsupported by any of the historians and the “leading proponent of Christ myth over the past century – is not a historian, but a professor of German”. The readers begin to doubt the credibility of Dawkins after reading this article and whether he and his “ideological cohorts” actually care to research a prevalent idea before they declare their endorsement of it. Even though people like Dawkins make sure their beliefs are free from any kind of doubts, most of the readers would definitely become cautious in believing the claims of these people after reading this…

    • 313 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    As much as people can see the physical characteristics that are passed down along generations, people may not realize just how much of their behavior is passed down genetically.…

    • 400 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Also, the possibilities of diminishing illness and disabilities via genetic technologies are what Green is trying to explain. Even though the process gives the parents “perfect child” how would you feel that your child is not made up of your genes; instead, it is someone that might not be even related to you? In my opinion, the processes are dangerous, what if there is a misapplied of genes? What going to happen next? Try again? This is something that we shouldn’t tolerate, because it’s not right. People should be just happy of what God gives to us, because it’s a gift. All the things that Green said that the diseases that we can prevent on having, like obesity, are something that we have control over. It can be passed along the genes of your kids, but there are ways to prevent it to happen, like eating balanced diet or preventing fast food chains. The diseases like obesity, diabetes, and etc are just common sense, since we have high technology today, we can find ways to avoid this to get worst. So, what if parents want a beautiful kid and he/she might turn out being not looking alike with his/ her parents? I think that parent doesn’t realize that their kid might face discrimination and bullying. Children who are designed may not be…

    • 538 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Gattaca Movie Analysis

    • 1211 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The geneticists mentioned that he is trying to give the parents the”best possible start” and that the child will be the “best of you.” I think people are misunderstanding that the child is the best of you, but not the best human being, because we are not perfect. Imperfection is what makes human unique. This shows that the genetic traits are the potential guides or the “start” of life, but people can still change due to their living environment. Sometimes I think gaining too much control of things makes it too complicated and it is better to leave it to nature and chance, just like how the parents in the film wanted some traits to be…

    • 1211 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Comfort Zone Analysis

    • 536 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The way people behave can not be genetically determined, right?! Nature and nurture are the movers and shapers, they make us what we are today, according to Harris, J. (1998)2 . Nature versus nurture is a much discussed topic, in psychology as well. There are a lot of theories about the question if we were formed by our genes or the environment where we live. Some psychologists argue that only one side has their impact like John Locke from the nature-side, while I believe it is an interaction between two of these factors, both of them have their influence on the development of that type of…

    • 536 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Sadly, this is probably what the world’s new generation of children would be like if some kids are designed by their parents and others are not. Children would not only feel bad about themselves, but they would blame their inabilities on their parents for not designing them to be something better than they are meant to be.…

    • 1415 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    People can genetically change their children in the womb. Parents will pick traits that they believe will be best for their children. People will pick traits that will make their children the best people possible. Parents will make their children be smart, kind, respectful, attractive looking and honest are just some of the many examples…

    • 1509 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Genetic inheritance - All children are unique individuals; babies only a few weeks old already have unique personalities. Children inherit their temperaments which are then influenced by social and environmental factors. It is agreed that children’s personalities are mixture of inheritance (nature) and environmental (nurture).…

    • 2209 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    In his book The Greatest Show on Earth Dawkins asserts that the retina, the light sensitive layer in the back of the eye, is “back to front”. He then goes on to explain: “… suppose I tell you that the eye’s photocells are pointing backwards, away from the scene being looked at. The “wires” connecting the photocells to the brain run all over the surface of the retina, so the light has to pass through a carpet of massed wires before they hit the photocells.” He goes on to conclude. “Once again, send it back, is not just bad design, it’s the design of a complete idiot.”…

    • 210 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    but does some of his own opinions as well. One of Dawkins views is that when it comes to religion people usually believe what their parents do: what they grew up believing. Many individuals do not look for evidence or justification in their religion, but believe in something because that is all they know. Another one of Dawkins’ views on religion differs from Humes in that Dawkins states that believing in God requires more clarification. Dawkins questions why the existence of the universe has to have a creator, but God does not.…

    • 809 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Reprecussions

    • 698 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The ramifications of genetic selection as suggested in Leonard Pitts’ “A Risk Free Life” are exponentially detrimental to our society as a whole. Genetic selection would be like opening a virtual “Pandora’s Box” negating the need for hope, faith, and the drive to overcome any obstacle we as humans are faced with.…

    • 698 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Typically, genetic engineering is viewed as a drive for mastery which deviates from the appreciation of nature and the gift of life (Sandel 9). Sandel believes it is against our human nature to tamper with genetics because it strips us of our humility. For example, parents are supposed to nurture and love their kids but genetically modifying them takes away that relationship. Children are a precious gift and should be accepted for who they are, not for what society dictates is “perfect”. Strengthening his argument, Sandel brings our attention to two types of love: accepting and transformative. A parent who displays accepting love is “open to the unbidden” of their child and loves them for who they are (Sandel 11). They focus more on the being of their child rather than their well-being. Alternatively, transformative love seeks to change the child assuming something is wrong with them in the first place. As one can see, this type of love is similar to germline engineering, in that its focus is on well-being. The problem that Sandel discusses is how parents are unable to maintain a balance between the acceptance and need for success from their child. A parent’s need to mold their children’s lives leads to the larger problem of hyper-parenting. Oftentimes, they get caught up in setting their child up for success and perfecting them. This brings us back to the point…

    • 450 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Nongenetic Memory

    • 1016 Words
    • 5 Pages

    There are at least two ways by which birth is related to memory (or ‘Collective Memory’ to be more precise); the first is the Jungian ‘Collective Unconscious’ transmitted hereditarily and has been alternatively called ‘genetic memory’ (Treffert) while the second are Dawkins’ memes transmitted culturally. Much scholarship has been done on the first and for our present purposes it should suffice to say that “the contents of the collective unconscious have never been in consciousness, and therefore have never been individually acquired, but owe their existence exclusively to heredity” (Jung 1). The second, however, shall henceforth be our primary concern. Towards the end of his 1979 book The Selfish Gene, the evolutionary biologist Richard Dawkins invented the word "meme" and recognized that a lot of human conduct came not from genes but rather from culture. He suggested that any nongenetic conduct be called a meme and posed the question as to whether the application of genetic logic to memes can be productive (to our understanding of culture). Patrick Davison writes in this context:…

    • 1016 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Custom Designed Drugs

    • 380 Words
    • 2 Pages

    In the world of their visionary fervour, parents can now afford the latest genetic "improvements" for their children. According to the advocates this is the human future (or, as some terms it, "post-human" future), the exercise of consumer preferences for offspring options will be the prelude to a grand achievement: the technological control of human evolution.…

    • 380 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays

Related Topics