Preview

Richard Hastings In William Shakespeare's Richard III

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
855 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Richard Hastings In William Shakespeare's Richard III
In this passage from William Shakespeare’s Richard III, Richard ingeniously portrays himself as a transparent man through creative wordplay and deceitful actions. As such he is able to effortlessly manipulate Hastings into initiating his own death. Throughout the passage, Hastings continuously misreads Richards's true character and as a result, foolishly ignores the many warnings given to him. He was ignorant to the fact that he is but another stepping stone towards Richards's journey to the crown. Hastings believes Richard to be an honest man with nothing to hide based on how he presents and carries himself in front of others, which proves to be a very costly misassumption. Richard is an intelligent man who often changes how he portrays himself …show more content…
At the beginning of the passage, he does not perceive Richard as a threat, because he was happy and welcoming, but by the end he comes to realize Richard’s true intentions all too abruptly. Hastings comes to an awakening that Richard is a power hungry man who is fuelled by his greed for the throne, after it’s too late, showing the themes of power and greed. In the beginning, Hastings begins with his confident statement “His Grace looks cheerfully”, referring to Richard and continues on to state “For by his face straight shall you know his heart,” here Shakespeare has used irony to covey just how when people believed they understood Richard he surprised them. Richard is able to cloak his true intentions and thoughts, which protects him from being in a venerable position. He is always in control of the conversation at all times and pushing the blame to others. Hastings judged Richard for how he presented himself while Richard was consistently scheming. Hastings' biggest mistake was to underestimate Richard and what he was capable of which led him to his death. Hastings did not think before he spoke and was ignorant and unaware he was walking towards his death, while Richard was determined to eliminate anyone that came in his way towards the crown. Yet, cunningly Richard never put himself in a position of risk where he would be suspected. Hastings can be perceived as a foolish man, as he walked into a trap after being given several warnings, the most obvious being Stanley’s dream which foreshadowed Hastings death as

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    King Richard’s ability as an actor within a play explores how this type of villainy was entertaining in the era of Shakespeare. Richard’s evil is immediately established as his moral deformities are clearly embodied in his physical deformities. In justifying his premeditated meddling, he personifies war in his first soliloquy. ‘Grim visag’d war hath supported his wrinkled front’ and moved to caper ‘ nimbly in a lady’s chamber!’ Richard’s nature: ‘Deform’d, unfinished’ thus justifies his evil as he cannot participate in the war -lovemaking atmosphere. This was obviously a form of entertainment to the Shakespearean audience who had known of the war of the Roses and Richard’s deformities.…

    • 1018 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The language is used in the scene to demonstrate Anne’s opinion of Richard as a cruel tyrant. Yet, through his cunning language, Richard is able manipulates Anne into marriage, increasing his political recognition to come closer to the crown and fulfilling his ambition.…

    • 197 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Intrinsic to both texts, there is the notion that art is used to directly influence and impact existing historical perceptions. Shakespeare’s “Richard III” explores this idea, using the most influential artistic medium of the time, theatre, to further publicise the ‘Tudor Myth’ perception. On stage, the visual motif of Richard’s appearance as “deformed, unfinished” reflects his moral deficiencies, reinforced by his soliloquys and asides that expose his underlying treachery. He forges a duplicitous role as both director and actor within the play, stating in the opening soliloquy “plots that I have laid, inductions dangerous…” Richard seemingly ‘stage manages’ the entirety of his world, creating a sense of dramatic irony from the juxtaposing of the different “masks” he feigns in contrast to his true intentions; he plays the role of the “grieving” brother, “Christian prince,” etc. As such, Richard’s meta-theatricality engages us on a psychological level that reinforces the perception of the Tudor Myth given not just the heinous nature of his crimes but the “villainous”…

    • 1036 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    By analysing the parallels and differences between King Richard III and Looking For Richard, the responder is positioned to appreciate the distinctive contexts from which each text emerged. Whilst an exploration of the moral vices and corruptive consequences of the relentless pursuit of power is explored in both texts, a closer examination of the way power is represented…

    • 1076 Words
    • 35 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    However, this falls when it is realized that while Richard is honest with us, the audience, he is not honest with those around him or the victims of his crimes and manipulation. Additionally, his honesty with the audience typically comes from a place of gloating about his superior intelligence and evil plots. This means that his honesty neither creates any benefit in the world he lives or comes from a place of positive intention. In summation, Richard’s practical actions cause great harm unto others and bring very minimal benefits. The other excuses Richard attempts to pawn up in the play also fall very quickly under examination.…

    • 833 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Shakespeare's play, it is easily seen that power is central as the whole situation that the characters find themselves in is due to a struggle for power, a fight for the throne. The civil war between the houses of York and Lancasters has been won ‘by this son of York’, King Edward, Richard’s brother. In the opening soliloquy Richard says ‘…since I cannot prove a lover/ To entertain these fair well-spoken days, / I am determined to prove a villain’. It is not only Richard who thirsts for power, but also Buckingham and the Woodvilles. Buckingham chooses to politically align himself with Richard for his gain, apparent when he asks Richard for the promised earldom of Hereford. He ignores Margaret’s warnings about Richard and continues to support him. He also enjoys acting almost as much as Richard, seen in Act 3 scene 5 when he tells Richard he can ‘counterfeit the deep tragedian’, and ‘I will play the orator’…

    • 2201 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The characters, namely Richard III and Richmond, offer an insight into the contextual concerns of the Elizabethan period. Their values offer modern audiences the opportunity to identify contextual features because the values are a product of the context, as is the text itself. Richard III is the epitome of the villain. He values deceit, devilishness, power and a disconnection from God and family which is against everything the pious Elizabethans believed in and this is depicted through his actions and language “I am determined to prove a villain” (I.i.30). The emphasis on good vs. evil and wrong vs. right was of the utmost significance to audiences because it taught them moral lessons. These moral lessons were important to Elizabethans because religion was an overarching aspect of their cultural context. Shakespeare combined the idea of Richard being deformed together with these values to emphasise the insidious nature of his personality and in effect, contrast him against the heroic Richmond.…

    • 1399 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    * Richard III – does conscience, acting and deception shape identity? Is Richard merely a creation of God’s divine will, or is he a cold hearted villain?…

    • 1297 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    to view Richard in different ways. It is from these different views of the same man, that one can draw…

    • 908 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Diction In Richard III

    • 1023 Words
    • 5 Pages

    In Act I Scene I, Richard’s brother Clarence is sent to the tower, the prison, by King Henry. Richard meets him in the tower and talks with him about his imprisonment, blaming it all on the King’s wife. In reality, Richard was indirectly responsible for the imprisonment of Clarence by starting rumors. Richard wanted Clarence in prison because he was in the way of Richard’s way to the throne. However, it does not end with Clarence’s imprisonment. Instead, Richard blames everything on the queen and promises to free Clarence. Thus gaining Clarence’s trust. While Clarence is in prison, he has a terrible dream foreshadowing his death. Following the dream, two murderers come to Clarence on Richard’s behalf. However, Clarence refuses to believe that Richard would do such thing because they were brothers and Richard had sworn his loyalty to him. After some debate, the murderers kill Clarence. It is evident in this scene that Richard used words to gain Clarence’s trust, but then broke it, resulting in his death. Clarence’s death was exactly what Richard wanted as he was in his way to the…

    • 1023 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Shakespeare’s King Henry IV, Part, the playwright aims to present differing views of the time on the themes and notions of being deceptive and honourable, through situation as well as character. Consequently the playwright leads to the central question what it means to be a man. William Shakespeare’s interpretation is reflected in the perfect transformation of Prince Hal. Shakespeare’s main characters Hotspur, Falstaff and Prince Hal display different understandings of honour and deception in order to support Shakespeare’s establishment of the nobility of Hal as he rises to take his place as Prince of Wales, future King. In addition to this, the concept of honour is seen to be derived from each individual’s characteristic interpretation. The proud and arrogant Hotspur is besotted with the idea of personal honour to a degree that it becomes a fault in his character, something Prince Hal needs to avoid. Falstaff represents honour among thieves”, he has an inverse comprehension of what honour means, a cowardly perception centred very much on his safety and comfort and as such represents the world of moral decay which the Prince must eschew. The idea of deception is something that Shakespeare places great emphasis on. He acknowledges that deception is part of a make-up of the medieval man, such as Hal, but is something that must be carefully managed, as witnessed with the demise of both the scheming Lord Worcester and the brutally honest Harry Percival.…

    • 1003 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Richard Iii

    • 645 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Shakespeare also gives great insight on Richard’s mind via diction. In Richard’s opening lines he specifically says, “Our dreadful marches to delightful measures” (1,1,8). Instead of fighting the Lancasters Richard (and his family) are in a time of harmony. He intentionally changes the negative word to a positive. Lines like these are all throughout the opening soliloquy. Richard allows the audience to see that he is at peace, that he is relaxed. By his big soliloquy in Act 5, Richard’s attitude is down. He’s worried about all the deeds he’s done. He directly states, “Is there a murderer here? No. Yes, I am:” (5,3,211). Not only does he leave the negative word of “murderer” in the sentence, but he…

    • 645 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    Foster, Edward E. "Hamlet, Prince Of Denmark." Masterplots, Fourth Edition (2010): 1-4. Literary Reference Center. Web. 3 Feb. 2013.…

    • 1773 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    Richard Iii Conscience

    • 969 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Richard's self "love" (5.5. 141), the kernel of his own identity, is threatened by the "fear" (5.5.136) his conscience instills in him. Throughout most of the play, the statement "Richard loves Richard" (5.5.137) functions as the character's motivation ‹ Gloucester consistently acts for his own "gain" (1.2.162). That self, however, has never been firmly worked out. The many "outward appearances" (Luxon) that Richard projects in the play are often contradictory, as he himself admits when he states that he "seem[s] a saint when most [he] play[s] the devil" (1.3.336). His interview with Anne shows just how malleable his self-identity is. Picturing himself through her eyes after he has wooed her, he states "I do mistake my person all this while" (1.2.239) and is determined to "maintain" his heightened opinion of himself with "some little…

    • 969 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Throughout the play, many characters planned retribution for another’s actions, mostly ending with a murder. Hamlet, with his tragic flaw, never acted upon his intentions to kill the king Claudius, while his intended victim plotted Hamlet’s own murder. As the audience knows about the character’s plans, the victims do not and go along with the plot. This insight allows the audience to really see how Hamlet’s tragic flaw lead to his own death. It also allows the audience to see the King’s truly deceptive side as he denies all knowledge of any plan that mistakenly resulted in the Queen’s death.…

    • 565 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays