How far did Richard III demonstrate the capacity to be a good king 1483-1485? (24 Marks)…
How has your exploration of the connections between your prescribed texts enhanced your understanding of the values and contexts of each?…
The comparative analysis of Shakespeare’s “Richard III” circa 1591 and Al Pacino’s 1996 docudrama “Looking for Richard” (LFR) reveals the capacity of these texts to transcend their timeframes due to their exploration of ideas perennially relevant to human nature. As humans, there is an innate desire of us to exert our ideals and beliefs on others as well as an underlying ambition for power, hence these texts explore the way in which art can be used to shape and reshape historical perceptions as well as the universal relevance of power to human beings.…
Edward IV’s death caused many issues with regards to power shortly after he died because of many difficulties. This ranges from a complicated will, to the betrayal from his brother, Richard, Duke of Gloucester. Shortly before Edward IV’s death, he amended his will, and the only copy of the new will was ruined and nobody ever really knew what changes Edward IV made. Because of this, there was a bitter power struggle. This power struggle revolved around two competing factions, Woodville and Gloucester.…
Th ink sw ap Do cu me nt Question: In what ways does a comparative study accentuate the distinctive contexts of King Richard III and Looking For Richard? Question 2: To what extent have the connections you have made between the two texts shown how particular concerns, although timeless, impact differently on individuals in different contexts.…
In Act 1 scene 4 of “King Richard III”, Shakespeare explores the concept of free will clashing with Providentialism through the debate between Clarence and the two Murderers. Shakespeare juxtaposes Clarence’s dream with his murder in order to affirm the value of Providentialism and the Great Chain of Being which underpinned Elizabethan hierarchical society. On wakening from his dream, Clarence describes the torment of his soul in Hell at the behest of Warwick and the murdered Prince Edward who, “dabbled in blood” demands that the furies “take him in torment”. Clarence accepts his crimes and the punishment which is to be his as a just outcome of Providentialism, praying only that God “spare my guiltless wife and children”. This is immediately juxtaposed with the entrance of the two Murderers who, in their decision to murder a Prince, represent the rising power of secularism and free will. Shakespeare explores this dichotomy in Clarence’s pleas for his life; firstly he appeals to their secular greed, promising that “my brother Gloucester…shall reward you” for his life and, when this fails, asks if they “will war with God” by murdering him. Shakespeare’s use of emotive language such as “beastly, savage, devilish” draws attention to the crisis of…
Edward IV, king of England, died suddenly and prematurely at Windsor castle – perhaps from a stroke, or peritonitis or even a chill caught while on a fishing trip – in April 1483 aged only 40 years. He had enjoyed a relatively successful reign, by the standards of the day, restoring peace after the disordered period of Lancastrian rule and providing his subjects with some much needed stability. Edward IV had been a strong king after 1471, able to control the rival noble factions, but his death opened up a destructive, disastrous Yorkist family feud. The throne should have passed smoothly to his son; Edward V. This however didn’t happen due to his brother, Richard duke of Gloucester wanting the power; Edward changed his will on his death bed so his wishes weren’t clear; his marriage to Elizabeth Woodville. On his death a bitter family feud was started.…
In Act I Scene I, Richard’s brother Clarence is sent to the tower, the prison, by King Henry. Richard meets him in the tower and talks with him about his imprisonment, blaming it all on the King’s wife. In reality, Richard was indirectly responsible for the imprisonment of Clarence by starting rumors. Richard wanted Clarence in prison because he was in the way of Richard’s way to the throne. However, it does not end with Clarence’s imprisonment. Instead, Richard blames everything on the queen and promises to free Clarence. Thus gaining Clarence’s trust. While Clarence is in prison, he has a terrible dream foreshadowing his death. Following the dream, two murderers come to Clarence on Richard’s behalf. However, Clarence refuses to believe that Richard would do such thing because they were brothers and Richard had sworn his loyalty to him. After some debate, the murderers kill Clarence. It is evident in this scene that Richard used words to gain Clarence’s trust, but then broke it, resulting in his death. Clarence’s death was exactly what Richard wanted as he was in his way to the…
Clarence’s dream commenced with he had fled from the London Tower, then he recalled the war of roses with Richard on the deck of…
Lear is in the French army quarters with his daughter Cordelia, he has been sleeping for awhile. Cordelia wakes the king, and at first it seems as if Lear is still mad and thinks Cordelia is a ghost. However, the doctor claims that it is only due to the fact that he is still half asleep. Lear proves his sanity, calling himself a, “foolish fond old man”, that he might not be, “in my perfect mind”, but he thinks he should remember Cordelia and Kent. Lear proves his sanity by accepting his circumstances and actually does see clearly now. Shakespeare gives closure in this subject with the doctor, “Be comforted, good madam. The great rage, you see, is killed in him…”(4.7.91). Shakespeare doesn’t just leave it here though, in the final scene of the play he presents Lear in his full sanity. Edmund sentences Lear and Cordelia to jail and Cordelia tells Lear that she is worried about him. Lear proclaims that he is fine and goes on to describe how jail won’t be that bad, because they will be together, “So we’ll live, // And pray, and sing, and tell old tales, and laugh…”(5.3.12). Lear has finally completed his journey, he has finally reached sanity once again, but Shakespeare will test him once more. Shakespeare didn’t intend for this to be the end for Lear. As Lear clutches the dead body of his beloved daughter, it seems as if he briefly falls back into madness. This is Lear’s final test, the final tragedy. However, he is only sad, mournful beyond extreme, and in his despair he cannot see clearly. As he holds the deceased body of Cordelia, he dies of sorrow. Kent, watching Lear die, tells everyone to leave him alone, “Vex not his ghost. O, let him pass! He hates him // That would upon the rack of this tough world // stretch him out longer.”(5.3.380) Shakespeare leaves the ending open, he does not give Lear a happy ending, but he did complete Lear’s journey, as Lear died with a sane, but sorrowful…
A change in behavioral patterns usually indicates something of a larger term. Whether it is a change in verbiage, tone, or something else, those changes usually represent a mental change that could range from stress, busyness, and the likes. King Richard in Richard III is no different. His syntax shortens, his diction darkens, and his imagery grows worrisome. The change in Richard’s syntax, diction, and imagery pattern indicates his emotional change from open and relaxed to stressed and self-conscious.…
Richard Frethorne, an indentured servant, wrote a letter to his parents dated March 20-April 3, 1623 in which he describes his experience as an indentured servant. Richard Frethorne was a young Englishman who like many other poor 17th century Englishmen were struggling to make ends meet back in England. Frethorne embarked on his journey to the America’s as an indentured servant in order to find a better life. Merchants in England took advantage of these poor people and recruited them to work as indentured servants in America. Frethorne was one of these poor persons who accepted to become an indentured servant, not knowing that everything that they were promised was not going to be fulfilled. Frethorne left England in 1623 and Jamestown, Virginia was his predetermined location. Frethorne’s life before servitude is quite vague, for there is not much record of his lifespan. However we are able to decipher that he has his two parents alive (mother and father) and he has siblings (both female and male). Based on the letter he sent back to his parents, Frethorne portrays the hardship of indentured servants in early 17th century Virginia. In his letter, Frethorne implores his parents for help. He is aware of the conditions in which he is exposed to living and he feels that the end is near for him. The letter serves as a cry for help as well as a goodbye letter if his death were to come. Frethorne compares his life now and the life he had back in England; in England he ate more in one day than he ate in one week in the ship; his parents have more to a beggar in England than what he had now. In truth, even though poor whites suffered in England because of their poverty, being an indentured servant was worse than poverty.…
Rivers, Grey, Vaughn and Hastings all die in Act III. As they are about to die, they all remember the curse of Margaret and how it is coming true, they can now only wish for Richard to also die. This suggests that the only justice coming from the play is as one is at their death. Richard uses death to get rid of his problems, but little does he know that Margaret’s curse will soon burden death on him.…
In the end, however, being disowned is the least of Cordelia’s problems. When the French are defeated by the English forces led by Edmund, Lear and Cordelia are captured. When they are confronted by Edmund, they are sentenced to prison. Edmund then orders a guard to execute them, before Edgar can intervene. Cordelia is killed before she can be freed, and Lear dies of a broken heart. This shows that, had Cordelia done what her father had asked rather than saying nothing, she would have led a better…
The dominant theme of Edward II is the theme of many of Marlowe's (and Shakespeare's) histories: the will to power and ultimately, the corruption inherent in power. Edward isn't murdered because of his affection for Gaveston. Rather, it is because in bestowing such extravagant favors on Gaveston, a commoner, he is subverting the ‘natural’ order of his position, neglecting both his kingdom and his family. He comes to realize that Gaveston wrongs him and he confesses in Act V,Scene III-…