His epiphany forced him to come to terms with the reality of his situation and actually recognize that it is okay for his family to not strive to learn anything and everything, and that their relationship can involve both his school and home life. He used these findings to finally understand that his education gave him “ways of speaking and caring about [the] fact” that “because of [his] school, [Rodriguez] had grown culturally separated from [his] parents.” (550) Hoggart’s perception of a “scholarship boy” influenced the way that Rodriguez saw himself in his family in the future. As a result of all of this, Rodriguez uses these findings in his own writing by directly relating his story to Hoggart’s definition of a “scholarship boy.” For example, at the beginning of part three, Rodriguez uses what I assume is a paraphrase of a characteristic analyzed by Hoggart about a “scholarship boy,” and then he continues on to directly relate his experience to being an embodiment of such a student. Finally, Hoggart’s language permitted Rodriguez to see his faults, but, unfortunately, it is “inevitable” that if he tried to reform his ways of learning, he would fall back into the pattern of
His epiphany forced him to come to terms with the reality of his situation and actually recognize that it is okay for his family to not strive to learn anything and everything, and that their relationship can involve both his school and home life. He used these findings to finally understand that his education gave him “ways of speaking and caring about [the] fact” that “because of [his] school, [Rodriguez] had grown culturally separated from [his] parents.” (550) Hoggart’s perception of a “scholarship boy” influenced the way that Rodriguez saw himself in his family in the future. As a result of all of this, Rodriguez uses these findings in his own writing by directly relating his story to Hoggart’s definition of a “scholarship boy.” For example, at the beginning of part three, Rodriguez uses what I assume is a paraphrase of a characteristic analyzed by Hoggart about a “scholarship boy,” and then he continues on to directly relate his experience to being an embodiment of such a student. Finally, Hoggart’s language permitted Rodriguez to see his faults, but, unfortunately, it is “inevitable” that if he tried to reform his ways of learning, he would fall back into the pattern of