Preview

Right To Bear Arms Pros And Cons

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
785 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Right To Bear Arms Pros And Cons
It has often been seen throughout history that when the United States government impedes on the rights of civilians, people tend to feel as though they are being stripped of their basic rights to life, liberty, and property. These basic rights are inalienable by law, according to the Declaration of Independence, and the government must tread lightly when making decisions in correspondence to them. In recent years laws and bills have been passed by legislation in regards to gun control with the intent of making the U.S. a safer place for all citizens who reside within its borders. However, the right to bear arms is protected by the second amendment and is highly favored by many American citizens making it a highly controversial topic. In the …show more content…
The Brady Handgun Prevention Acts, enacted November 30, 1993, made it unavoidable for anyone seeking to purchase a firearm without first passing a background check headed by the Federal Bureau of Investigation. The acts also made it illegal to conceal a handgun without proper licensing as well as put restrictions on who can buy certain firearms. A continuation of the acts also made it so that an individual must be 21 years of age to own a handgun legally and 18 years old to own a rifle or shotgun. The F.B.I. also keeps records of all gun purchases made in the U.S. and retains all information about the individuals who purchase them. The most critical act created in regards to gun control was the Federal Assault Weapons Ban passed on September 13, 1994. This act made it illegal for civilians to own military grade weapons in the U.S. which is critical in order to ensure that these firearms do not find their way into the hands of those seeking to cause havoc. There are a number of specifications that weapons must meet in order to classify it as too lethal for public ownership or not. The weapon must first meet a specific magazine size and bullet caliber. Statistically, the AR-15 is the most popular assault rifle available to citizens of the U.S. numbering in at four million owners. This rifle fires a .223 caliber round and is now sold to the general public with a magazine that does not exceed fifteen rounds. A caliber of this magnitude is acceptable in America because it is said to have a lesser chance to create mass casualties in a shootout. Smaller ammunition cartridges has proven effective for this as well. The action made to lower magazine cartridge sizes was an effective law passed by congress. Less ammunition limits the ability for mass shootings and in a sense it also helps decrease the chances of

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Opponents of concealed carry argue that increased gun ownership leads to more gun crime and unintended gun injuries. They contend that concealed handguns increase the chances of arguments becoming lethal, and that society would be safer with fewer guns on the street, not more. Dr. John Lott, published More Guns, Less Crime which concluded that the "shall-issue" laws linked with a reduction in violent crimes in 1988. Lott argued that if states that did not permit concealed handguns in 1992 had permitted them in 1977, 1,570 murders, 4,177 rapes, 60,000 aggravated assaults, and 12,000 robberies would have been prevented between 1977 and…

    • 103 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Before this assignment I opposed the open carry law. Guns should not be allowed on college campuses, amusement parks, or any other public place because I believe it endangers the lives of children, teens, and adults everywhere. My attitude and beliefs toward the open carry law after doing this assignment are still the same, however, they have changed slightly. I am still not in agreement with carrying loaded guns anywhere, but under certain circumstances, I believe it should be allowed. For example, if a female nurse is getting off work late and she is parked in the hospital garage, she would need something to protect herself with just in case someone were to try to harm her. Although, my suggestion is for people to use Tasers, or other…

    • 137 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Those two things seem to coincide with each other. Lately on the news there have been a number of mass shootings, terrorist attacks, violence in neighborhood, etcetera. As the number of these crimes seem to happen more often throughout the years, peoples fight or flight instincts tend to kick in, and they feel like they have to do what they need to do in order to protect themselves. And that usually results in people's fight response being activated, and wanting to be feel like they are able to keep themselves and their family safe end up with them going out and getting a gun. As of last October, the Gallup poll was taken and stemmed out into saying that 63% of Americans believe that having a gun in their household makes them feel a whole lot safer than having a home without a gun. According to the Pew Research Center Survey only 37% of adults own a gun in their household. While the numbers may appear to not seem like a lot, as a researcher it's hard to pinpoint the exact number of individuals who do have a gun in their possession due to not everyone answering the survey on whether or not they have acquired a gun. So the big question for the people and the government are "Is the right to keep and bear arms a civil right?" and " Should we have restrictions when obtaining a gun?" So the present today debate on the Second Amendment main focus is on the protection of an individual right to bear arms or is it a right than can only be protected by the…

    • 750 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Concealed carry has been around since the beggining of America. It is our second amendment right to carry a concealed weapon in the public. In second amendment it states, “a well regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to bear arms should not be fringed” (B). That means that people should have the right to have a weapon and defend themselves. That was obviously put into place a long time ago, but more recently they changed it a little bit. In the 2012 court case “moore vs. madigan” ruled that, “ The second amendment right to bear arms must be interpreted to include a right to have a concealed carry in public, to have it ready for use, and to have it for self defence” (B). That debate…

    • 249 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Nra Gun Reform

    • 3265 Words
    • 14 Pages

    Our Second Amendment in the Bill of Rights had created a virtual war over guns and gun ownership in the United States for more than two centuries. It reads The Second Amendment provides: "A well-regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a Free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed." It is the only amendment written with a purported purpose. The only one with a preamble or perhaps an observation that; a well-regulated militia is a necessity for the security of a free state, and an objective or a legality that: the right…

    • 3265 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The second Amendment was put into place on December 15. 1971, and it reads “The right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.” This right was given to us so long ago, and now it is trying to be taken away from the Americans of the United States of America. The American Government has tried to limit pistol usage and the use of high powered rifles in America. In our country today many people want to feel safe and know that they are protected, but do you really think you are safe? An a individual that is robbing someone or hurting somebody does not care about gun laws! The government should not harass the normal civilian that has one gun in his household. The government should be catching the criminals that are using the weapons…

    • 806 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Constitution is supposedly the law of the land, right? Well America will soon find out how true that statement actually stands. “The right of people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed,” is part of the second amendment developed by the forefathers of this country (constitutioncenter.org). In the recent debates about gun control, the government is talking about taking away the rights that amendment gives citizens. This has recently become an issue because of all of the public shootings and crimes around the U.S. While something should be done to stop violent crimes and shootings, guns are not the issue and people refuse to understand is that it’s the person behind the gun that pulls the trigger not the gun itself.…

    • 965 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The second amendment, the right to bear arms, was adopted on December 15, 1791. In that day in age, guns were not as powerful as they have become, and many who created the Bill of Rights could not have predicted the future. If the constitution, or Bill of Rights, had been written with the knowledge of today’s weapons the Second Amendment would be different. Now in the 21st century there have been many cases where the Second Amendment has been brought into question. These cases have brought questions that deal with the amendment having been written for civilians, but also the worry of the advancements that have been made in weaponry since the time the Second Amendment was written.…

    • 1018 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Gun control in the United States has become a highly controversial topic over the years. There have been plenty of debates on the gun control laws and people have taken to being either pro gun control laws or anti gun control laws. One thing we can’t deny would be that gun control laws would keep us all safer and even save lives. Statistic show that more guns equals to more homicide cases. If more citizens have easy access to guns, they’re more likely to kill than if they didn’t have easy access to the guns. Public places like schools, restaurants, and churches are not acceptable places for people to be carrying guns; it puts the public in danger. It should be illegal.…

    • 782 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Gun Control Pros And Cons

    • 1709 Words
    • 7 Pages

    In the wake of multiple shootings such as the theatre shooting in Aurora, Colorado, should U.S. gun control laws be reformed, or would that result in the violation of constitutional rights? From the day the Second Amendment to the U.S. Constitution was adopted on December 15, 1791, giving U.S. citizens the right to carry firearms, the issue of gun control has been the subject of many debates. And the effects of more strictly regulated Gun control would be detrimental to our society. Gun control is unreasonable for the following reasons: 1) the right to own and carry weapons is granted by the Constitution and upheld by the Supreme Court, 2) the majority of U.S. gun owners…

    • 1709 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    The debate over the restrictions of gun control is centered on the Second Amendment to the Constitution, which gives people the right to bear arms. Gun control supporters believe that this explicit right does not extend to ownership of military-style firearms. For example, groups like the National Rifle Association argue that gun control infringes on the constitutional rights of law-abiding citizens. Gun control is an on-going debate because each year more people are killed by the use of guns. However, guns are not the result in the number of homicides each year, the problems rests with the irresponsible gun users. Gun Control would do nothing but harm America because guns offer protection and security…

    • 1203 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    America's Second Amendment

    • 1132 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The text of the Second Amendment of America’s constitution is as followed “A well-regulated Militia, being necessary for the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed” (U.S. Const. amend. II). This small portion of text has been widely debated and analyzed over the years to determine exactly what it entails in order to discover what rights it actually grants United States citizens, if any. Over the course of our nations brief existence we, as a people, have had the pleasure of practicing our right of self-preservation through the tools that have been bestowed upon us via the Second Amendment. However, some individuals have grown comfortable in an existence where…

    • 1132 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Recently, public debates have been less focused on the safety and wellbeing of our youth and kids. Instead, the debate has been heavily focused on the meaning of the Second Amendment to the U.S. Constitution and the proper use of guns by the adults. The Second Amendment reads, "A well-regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be…

    • 1206 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Gun Control Research

    • 1416 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The Second Amendment states “"A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed" (Bill of Rights). It was adopted on December 15, 1791, along with the rest of the Bill of Rights. Americans felt that the right to arms was important for different reasons such as stopping invasions, participating in law enforcement, enabling the people to organize a militia system, preventing an undemocratic government, etc. Later into the twentieth century, a debate had grown about. The question most frequently being asked in many different words are, is the amendment that was created to ensure the continuation and successful of the state militias as a means of defense, or was it created to ensure an individual’s right to own a firearm. People, gun control advocates, began to read the second amendment concerned with rising violence in society and the role firearms play in that violence. While on the other side, firearm enthusiasts saw the attacks on gun ownership as attacks on freedom and defended their interpretation of the second amendment just as aggressively. Much of the debate that is going on today is centered on how the amendment was phrased and no…

    • 1416 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Best Essays

    Further evidence from Gun Violence and Gun Control states “On an annual basis, about 30,000 Americans are killed with guns each year, about 80,000 seriously injured…and an estimate in 2000 concluded that gun violence costs the nation a total of $100 billion annually in direct and indirect costs, including medical costs and lost productivity (805-806). The need for Americans to be able to protect themselves appears to be well documented. According LaPierre, Vice President of the NRA “Some 2.5 million times a year, according to well founded research, Americans defend themselves with firearms” (LaPierre 153). In contrast, Gun Violence and Gun Control states that “most analysts believe guns are used in legitimate self defense situations approximately 100,000 times per year” (806). The difference in figures and opinions reflects the vastness in the differing opinions as well as how high their emotions run. Nonetheless, there does appear to be a need for Americans to defend themselves and a need for regulation. The preceding statistics, along with examples of the obvious failure of banning firearms, and the number of firearms kept out of criminals hands due to the Brady Bill offers evidence for a need for a balance in…

    • 2849 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Best Essays