CJA/364
09/17/2012
Chris Bragg
Right to Counsel Paper
To analyze and understand the aspects of the right to counsel one must understand the Sixth Amendment of the Constitution of the United States which states that; any person that is a U.S. citizen accused of a crime will have the right to counsel during a Criminal Procedure that helps aid the defendants or person accused defense. In this paper I am going to analyze the aspects of the right to counsel and the developments of the right to counsel in depth. Criminal Procedures included in the right to counsel and when self-representation came about will also be discussed. Also the role of an attorney and how it applies to our right to counsel.
To understand the Right to counsel one must understand the when it and how long ago it began. In the 16th and 17th century’s Criminal Defense attorneys were actually banned from certain criminal cases which prevented people from proper rights and justice. Later in the 17th century Criminal Defense attorneys began to be allowed in treason cases (which previously were not), by the 18th century almost all criminal cases could have a defense attorney. The reasoning behind these changes was due to the Amendments of the Constitution as well and ratification of some of these Amendments I will discuss later in this paper. The Amendments of our Constitution focus highly on fundamental Rights which safe-guard us against federal and state actions giving us a right to the Due Process of Law. Included in these rights were a suspect accused of a crime was aloud a right to counsel aid during interrogations and Criminal Prosecutions. Under the Fourteenth Amendment it is a violation to convict a defendant without a counsel aid which violates those individuals’ rights. The purpose and reasoning behind these rights of counsel aid is to lead to a fair trial.
Our right to counsel in the United States is a right we all have whether we have committed a crime or not. A right to counsel is viewed as a privilege and shows equality in our Justice System. A person accused of a crime can choose to have a counsel aid in their defense which this right begins immediately when taken into police custody. For people who are a defendant for trial and they cannot afford counsel they then are appointed counsel. This right to counsel clause show how balanced our Criminal Justice system is in following the Constitution. The ratification of the Sixth Amendment which added State requirements for right to counsel changed to what we know it as today. The reason this right to counsel is so important is those of us that are wrongly accused of a crime have protection and we also have a guarantee whether we are guilty or not guilty we are treated fairly and proper convictions get done and justice gets served.
Another aspect in our criminal justice system I found surprising the more I learned about was our right to Self- Representation. A defendant has the right to represent themselves and can get approved for what appears and is a risky request. In our history in the U.S. of self-representation cases the majority have not succeeded in their intended outcome of the trial after making that choice. A defendant who chooses self-representation have a higher chance in losing their case, however the principle of the fact that one can choose so goes along with our constitution ensuring our freedoms, rights, and protections. Many who choose to self-represent are often people who mistrust the CJS, have had bad experiences with past attorneys, or simply because they believe they can do better than any other aid. An individual who chooses this option must know proper court room expectations and guidelines, have proper opening and closing arguments, and stay on track throughout proceedings with the case and displaying factual, reliable evidence.
The decision of whether or not to have an attorney/counsel is a decision we all have to make. It is not required to obtain an attorney or accept the one appointed to you; however it is crucial to use any aid one can due to the legal advice that can be life changing advice. Having an attorney gives the attorney the opportunity to serve as our advisor or consultant who is very knowledgeable of the Criminal Justice System and court processes. When using the service of an attorney there are many steps in the process that are required. A consultation is an opportunity for the attorney to explain to their client the possible positives and negative outcomes of the case. An attorney is there for their clients to ask questions, and he/she will guide and direct their client with the legal expertise. If you choose to have an attorney which is highly recommended that attorney has to commit and be successful in their efforts. Attorneys duties are; to be supportive by participating with all efforts, develop strong arguments for their client, and communicate with the court room efficiently. Having the right to counsel ensures we have a backbone in the courtroom by having the opportunity to have a person appointed to us with zealous and ethical representation. An attorney communicates effectively, gives legal directions, while keeping their client attorney based relationship and details confidential. An attorney must be loyal while keeping our best interests in first priority.
Reference Page:
Hoefel, J. C. (2007) Toward Moore robust Right to Counsel of Choice. Sandiego Law Review, 44(3), 525-550. Retrieved September 15th 2012 from EBSCOhost University Library.
Holland, B. (2009), A relational sixth Amendment during interrogation. Journal or Criminal Law and Criminology 99(2), 381. Retrieved September 16th 2012 from EBSCOhost University Library. http://criminal.findlaw.com/criminal-rights/right-to-counsel/ http://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/right_to_counsel
You May Also Find These Documents Helpful
-
On June 13th 2003, Patterson was walking through the common area of the University Park Mall ( the Mall) when she slipped and fell on a liquefied cheese substance, “which was like cheese whiz”. Due to the high volume of traffic, Patterson did not see the cheese substance prior to the fall, as she and her daughter passed through the mall that day. Patterson states she did not see anyone trying to avoid the cheese before she slipped nor did she notice anyone dropping it just prior to her fall. She states she did not notice anyone with cheese on their shoes or anyone who was tracking it with their feet.…
- 2827 Words
- 12 Pages
Good Essays -
In all actions brought to recover damage for negligence resulting in death or injury to person or property, the fact that the plaintiff may have been guilty of…
- 472 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
The case of Escobedo V. Illinois set the precedent for the sixth amendment, which is the right to a counsel. It guaranteed that if a person is arrested then they must be informed of their legal rights, which gives them the right to remain silent. When Danny Escobedo was arrested in connection for the shooting of one of his relatives he received an 18-hour interrogation and was later released for not making any self-incriminating statements. Another suspect was later arrested and told police that Escobedo had committed the murder. He was then once again arrested and this time interrogated through the entire night. His attorney had been repeatedly denied permission to talk to his client. Escobedo as well had repeatedly asked to see his lawyer…
- 306 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
In the Texas vs Cobb case a man named Raymond Levi Cobb was first arrested in 1994 and confessed to a home burglary. In this process he denied that he killed the woman and child in the home but later confessed to his father which his father then went to report this to the police. Even though Cobb later waived his Miranda rights and confessed he was still indicted and sentenced to death. Cobb argued to the Texas Court of Appeals that after his confession he was denied his right to counsel because his request for an attorney wasn’t renewed after the burglary case. The Court later said that the right to counsel carries onto the reason charged if any other offenses are closely related to the case. It was then declared with a five to four vote under…
- 288 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
In 1963 Clarence Earl Gideon presented himself in front of the Supreme Court. Gideon had been indicted for breaking and entering; after defending himself in his preliminary trial he was sentenced to five years in prison. During his time in jail, Gideon did some research on law and wrote an appeal to the Supreme Court. Gideon’s request of representation was on behalf of the due process clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. The court decided to put the case on trial; it related back to the Betts v. Brady case of 1942. Unlike Betts v. Brady’s 6-3 ruling in which Betts had lost, Gideon won the case with an astounding 9-0 majority. The main issue of the case centers on proper representation of the defendant. In order for the reader to fully understand the scope of the case, he or she needs to consider Betts v. Brady.…
- 2093 Words
- 9 Pages
Good Essays -
Gideon v. Wainwright was one of a series of Supreme Court decisions which confirmed the right of defendants in criminal proceedings to counsel during trial, on appeal, and in the subsequent cases of Massiah v. United States 377 U.S. 201 (1964) and Miranda v. Arizona 384 U.S. 436 (1966), even during police interrogation.…
- 773 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
is also propositioned,but considers the workingenvironmentso intolerable that she resigns before any adverse action is taken…
- 9192 Words
- 37 Pages
Good Essays -
In 1963, the Supreme Court ruled in Gideon v. Wainwright that the Sixth Amendment guarantees every defendant, regardless of socioeconomic status, the right to an attorney and equal protection under the court of law. This means that an indigent defendant that cannot afford to hire a private attorney may have a public defender appointed to him or her. However, fifty years later, the promises of Gideon v. Wainwright may remain unfulfilled. Public defenders may not be able to provide the same treatment to their clients as a private attorney, resulting in harsher sentences being placed on indigent defendants. This is clearly not the equal treatment that Gideon sought, and it is rather evident that the public defender system is very flawed.…
- 2715 Words
- 11 Pages
Best Essays -
A. After Gideon v. Wainwright established a right to counsel for indigent felony defendants, courts have wrestled with four areas:…
- 433 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the state and district wherein the crime shall have been committed, which district shall have been previously ascertained by law, and to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation; to be confronted with the witnesses against him; to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor, and to have the assistance of counsel for his defense.…
- 402 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
With the American Criminal Justice System, a person accused of a crime has the right to be represented by an attorney to advise them and represent them in a court. Attorneys must meet with clients and get information from the client to help form a strong defense strategy for their case. Attorney and their clients have what is known as attorney-client privilege, which allows attorneys to keep conversations between and information gain from their clients confidential except in the formation of the defense’s case. Privilege is essential for communication, trust and confidentiality.…
- 349 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
The Sixth Amendment of the United States Constitution states: Protects the right to a fair and speedy public trial by jury, including the rights to be notified of accusations, to confront the accuser, to obtain witnesses and to retain counsel. This means the subject has the right to counsel before, during, and after questioning. Should the subject request the presence of an attorney, questioning should cease until counsel arrives.…
- 868 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
The right to counsel is guaranteed by the Sixth Amendment to the Constitution. It provides for counsel in phases of a criminal proceeding for anyone who cannot afford one. This wasn’t always the case. Early colonial days did not allow defendants the opportunity to hire their own attorney nor was one appointed. This right has been earned in incremental stages involving several precedent cases. Those cases include Powell v. Alabama, 287 U.S. 45 (1932), Johnson v. Zerbst, 304 U.S. 458 (1938), Gideon v. Wainwright, 372 U.S. 335 (1963), Argersinger v. Hamlin, 407 U.S. 321 (1972), and United States v. Wade, 388 U. S. 218 (1967). Today, counsel is guaranteed in all phases of critical pretrial events. Counsel is also guaranteed during post-trial sentencing procedures and in a first appeal to a conviction ensuring the presence, expert advice, and assistance at all stages of a prosecution (Kanovitz, 2010, p. 409).…
- 1808 Words
- 8 Pages
Better Essays -
Ryan, Liz. Cardozo; retrieved on April 6, 2015 from; Law Review. Feb2014, Vol. 35 Issue 3, p1167-1184. 18p.…
- 733 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
When suspects are facing trial they can defend themselves, hire an attorney, or have one appointed by the state. Having a lawyer can help because they have training in defending their clients. This right also protects the poor suspects who can not afford a lawyer to represent them. The people that can not afford one can choose to have a lawyer or to represent themselves. It is a good idea to have a lawyer because he will be best fit to defend someone because of his experience and practice.…
- 770 Words
- 4 Pages
Satisfactory Essays