Preview

Rights And Duties In The Hollywood Film Run Away Jury

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
522 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Rights And Duties In The Hollywood Film Run Away Jury
Rights and duties are correlative. The Hollywood film, "Run Away Jury," sensationally depicts a number of the processes that jurors experience during a criminal trial. View the film and then discuss, based on the chapter readings, what these rights and duties are that attach to jurors?
Deontology is defined by dictionary.com as ethics, especially that branch dealing with duty, moral obligation, and right action ("Deontology," n.d.). The text suggests that as far as deontology applies to criminal justice they are five (5) elements that relate to punishment. (1) Based on the crime the state has a moral right to punish based on the crime. (2) The state has a moral; duty to punish based on the interest of justice alone. (3) The punishment must be equivalent to the crime that was committed. (4) Punishment severs to even out or rectify the harm that was committed. (5) Offender has a right to be respected and has a moral right to punishment (Arrigo & Williams, 2008, p. 184). The sum of these elements does a very good job in explaining the duties of a jury.
Those that have not been exposed to a jury trial might be rather shocked how to process works, not only in criminal matters but also in civil matters as in the case
…show more content…
Nick manipulated his way onto the jury and then after the trial made an offer that the jury could be bought for a monetary price. Deontology, was used by Nick after gaining the trust of the parties in the jury, Nick used his influence to assure that others feelings as to their moral duties, obligation and right action was used in his favor. In this case the bribe was paid and collected, the jury was pushed in favor of the plaintiff with a huge monetary award. The bribe was use to force the jury consultant Flitch to retire and the money used to benefit victims in the previous shooting in Gardner

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    The case between Ms. Darcy Vs Big Car Company, I would have to agree 100% with what the Jugde decided to do. Based on the facts that were present, I would have ruled that this move onto trial in front of Jury of our peers as well. While Ms. Darcy was under the direct supervision of Clarence he was rude and forth coming with is attitude towards Ms. Darcy which was presented in lewd and harassing manner. With the many attempts that Ms. Darcy had towards Clarence he would continue to gesture and run into her in very threatening manner and making an hostile work environment for Ms. Darcy.…

    • 614 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    This is a jury trial analysis paper in which I am to identify and discuss the steps in a jury trial. I will also discuss the constitutional rights that are enacted during jury trial. I will examine and discuss the selection of a fair and unbiased jury. There are seven steps in a jury trial and I will discuss them all throughout my paper.…

    • 920 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Carl Lee Jury Trial

    • 1632 Words
    • 7 Pages

    There is a thing known as a jury trial process that is supposed to happen in every jury trial case. Although, not followed perfectly in the jury trial of Carl Lee it is followed pretty well for a movie. The jury trial process is as follows; a crime is commited, an investigation is conducted, a warrant is issued, then the arrest is made, once arrested the criminal is booked, then they have their bail hearing. Following the bail hearing the preliminary arraignment happens these are when the informal charges are presented, after that comes the preliminary hearing this is where the court reviews the evidence to make sure there is enough evidence for a case to occur. If there is enough evidence they move on to the formal indictment where the…

    • 1632 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    According to the song, it had all been decided before hand. The District Attorney (D.A.) was “[practicing] all his lines in the mirror.” He knew what the outcome was going to be, and so did everybody else. They must’ve all “read the morning paper, The headline [read] “the man hangs” but the jury doesn’t.” The D.A. doesn’t have to say anything to convince the jury over- a hung jury is an undecided jury-they agree with what the newspaper says. The man is already hung. Just like in TKAM, Tom Robinson had no chance to win. But even if some of the jury isn’t convinced-Mr. Cunningham-the Prosecutor can just “pay to close it like a casket.” Even the witness is payed off he is, “Too well dressed for the witness stand” AKA he just got new clothes. Hmm, maybe a new paycheck?? The defendant has no chance, he either “[Hangs] on a rope, or bated breath.” The death penalty will be served, or the suspense will end him. Game over. To add to the injustice of this case “The press prays for whichever headline is worse.” The accused has nothing going for him. The jury, either they get payed to vote against him, or they agree with the Prosecutor. The witness already got payed off to say the ‘right’ thing; and the press just doesn’t care-unless it will help them sell papers. That dude couldn’t catch a break. The 5 minorities arrested had DNA proof-DNA that is I believe 100% accurate, they were innocent and no amount of arguing could prove it another way-yet they still were convicted. Tom Robinson had the 1930’s version of DNA proof, yet he stood no chance at being…

    • 670 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Runaway Jury

    • 798 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Two years after Celeste Wood’s husband was gunned downed at his work place by a failed day trader she, along with her attorney Wendell Rohr (Hoffman), take the weapons manufacturer, Vicksbergs Firearms, to court on grounds of gross negligence due to large amounts of firearms (semi-automatics) being purchased on a regular basis by one party, who then turns around to sell them for a profit. The defendant’s team is made up of Durwood Cable and a jury consultant, Rankin Fitch (Hackman). Throughout the jury selection process Fitch is calling the shots behind the scene as Fitch and his team have set up surveillance cameras to view the happenings within the court room. As potential jurors are called and questioned, Fitch’s team research into each person’s life and then gives Durwood the green-light to keep them on board. One of the potential jurors is Nick Easter (Cusack), a seemingly easy going guy who would much rather be anywhere else but the boardroom. Fitch’s team looks into Easter’s background but nothing comes up. After the 12 jurors, and alternates, have been picked the trial begins. Fitch receives a call from a Marlee (Weisz), who promises she can guarantee a verdict in the defenses favor for a price – ten million dollars. Marlee makes this same offer towards the plaintiff. It comes out Marlee and Easter are working together, Marlee from the outside and Easter within.…

    • 798 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    As we walked into the jury room, after hearing the case of Commonwealth v. Miller, I had already decided how I would vote and, honestly, I determined I was not going to be swayed. We swiftly chose a foreman by appointing the one, who had been given the jury instructions, to that position. Next, we read the jury instructions out loud, in order to remember and understand the definition of each charge. Debate over the meaning of the instructions ensued for a short amount of time before we dove into determining guilt or innocence. Everyone was given a chance to discuss the case and, personally, I felt comfortable entering the discussion and debating the case. After discussion, we voted and were evenly split among guilty or not guilty. Next, we…

    • 661 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Casey Anthony

    • 1409 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Courtroom trials are very interesting to me and I really enjoyed clerking for judges and being able to watch everything from beginning to end. The case I have chosen is a jury trial and that jury ends up being seven women and five men. The criminal laws that were violated were many starting with Child Neglect, making false official statements and obstructing an investigation. Forging checks, fraudulent use of identification and petty theft, first degree murder, aggravated child abuse aggravated manslaughter and four counts of lying to law enforcement. Heading the prosecution was the District Attorney of Orange County Florida with several of the Assistant District Attorney’s. The defense has Jose Baez and what they were calling a ‘team’ of defense counsel, which actually ended up only being 3. Judge Belvin Perry was on the bench and all of the witnesses that were on both the states list of witnesses to call but the defense as well. The outcome of this trial rocked the nation as the verdict was read live which were Not Guilty of Aggravated Murder, Aggravated Child Abuse and Aggravated Manslaughter. The defendant was found guilty on 4 counts of the forgery of checks and was credited for time served, then released from jail.…

    • 1409 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Juror In 12 Angry Men

    • 465 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Each juror had a history that they brought with them into the decision making process of the boys fate. None moreso than that of juror #3. A man who had a hard time dealing with his own son. He was embarassed when his 9 year old son ran away from a fight, so he “Taught him what it was like to be a man.” Years later, he got into a physical altercation with his son and they no longer spoke. After being so stubborn and adament that the boy was guilty, he throws his wallet and out falls a pitcure of him and his son. It was at that moment that he realized that the boy was not guilty and changed his…

    • 465 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Runaway Jury Ethics paper

    • 1214 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Is it ethical, for any man or woman, to swing a juries decision? The opening scene of the movie defines the trail that Jury will sit in on. A man walks into a New Orleans brokerage firm and opens fire on everyone inside. He kills one of the higher-ranking employs, Jacob Woods. The movie then immediately jumps two years ahead in time. We meet Nicholas Easter, played by John Cusack. He opens a letter to find out he has been summoned for Jury Duty. The case is none other than Celeste Woods, the woman whose husband had been shot two years prior, vs. Vicksburg Firearms, the company that allowed the gun to get into the killers hands. As Nick is walking away from his mailbox, someone is taking pictures of him. This is where the main ethical dilemma is revealed. Rankin Fitch, played by Gene Hackman, has already begun to gather information on all the possible jurors that could work the trail. He plans on getting the jurors that would vote for his client, Vicksburg Firearms. Wendell Rohr, the attorney that represents Celeste, also decides to hire a jury consultant like Fitch. He chooses a man that came down from Philadelphia, named Lawrence, to do the job. In the midst of the movie unfolding, we also find out that Nick has been chosen as Juror #9. When Nick arrives home later that night, He greets Marlee, and we learn that are trying to sway the jury as well. They are trying to make money by selling the Jurors votes to the highest paying side.…

    • 1214 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Today, the death penalty is an issue that has raised many questions in regards to its morality. Many people believe that the death penalty is immoral for a number of factors, some of which being the execution of innocents, the arbitrary application of the death penalty, and the racial and economic discrimination with the system. Many others believe that the death penalty is moral, for it gives people what they deserve, the criminals were fully aware of the consequences that may fall upon them, and that justice is being served for the victims and families of the victims still suffering from the actions of the criminal. In this paper I will argue that from a Deontological standpoint, the death penalty is morally just. To do this, I will first describe the basics of the theory of Deontology in general, so that you, the reader, can begin to understand some of the fundamental beliefs that Kant, the father of Deontology,…

    • 1404 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    cases jurors face some problems understanding evidences or actual facts, they don’t take in consideration essential facts not because they don’t want to, but they have a lack of experience in such complex cases such frauds for example. And when they face the obstacles in understanding this complexity they just acquit the defendant, because they think there is a reasonable doubt that he or she is not guilty, but usually there is required a professional who will find the answers and decides the case correctly.…

    • 112 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Trial By Jury

    • 1319 Words
    • 6 Pages

    It isn’t arduous to see why some may question the efficiency of trial by jury and whether it should, and is able to, continue to discover innocence or guilt. Regarding the trial of Vicky Pryce, the failure of the jury within the hearing conjured ridicule and disdain from the judge and the media. The case deeply unsettled the trust of many in the system. The eight women and four men were dismissed after illustrating “fundamental deficits of understanding” (Jacobson, Hunter & Kirby, 2015, p. 55). Their profuse questions for the judge were deemed as unintelligent and unnecessary and so a costly re-trial was required. Consequently, this ordeal provoked a stronger desire for the abolition of trial by jury, to be replaced by a single judge as a more…

    • 1319 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    As a play portraying the deliberations of a jury in a murder trial, Twelve Angry Men is naturally concerned with the idea of justice. Yet the play does not represent either the American criminal justice system or the abstract concept of justice as simple or clear. A simple representation of the criminal justice system might be named Twelve Serious Men, and portray those men as diligently, rationally, and single-mindedly going through the evidence until they uncover the facts that reveal what actually happened between the son and his father on the night of the murder. Twelve Angry Men is not that play. Instead, from its opening moments, it shows how both the juror’s motivations and their conceptions of justice are influenced, not entirely rationally…

    • 319 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The story starts with the very laborious job of jury selection. The tobacco industry has on their payroll a man by the name of Rankin Fitch. Fitch foresees the selection of the lawyers and consultants. Fitch and the consultants foresee the selection of the jurors. Each perspective juror is investigated and watched. The defense as well as the plaintiffs want to secure a verdict so they only want jurors sympathetic to their side. Fitch along with Rohr, the plaintiff’s lawyer, also had high priced detectives tailing perspective jurors. Anyone who was the least bit wrong for their cause had to be eliminated from the process.…

    • 2591 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Immanuel Kant Deontology

    • 333 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Deontologists claim that an action or a moral rule is right because of its own nature, even if it fails to bring about the greatest good. Deontology is critically based on duty (deontos) – a moral obligation we have towards another person, a group or society as a whole. In this sense, deontology is concerned with the intrinsic properties of actions, not their end result.…

    • 333 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays