Preview

Rights During Detention

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
625 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Rights During Detention
Describe the rights during detention at a police station of an individual suspected of a serious offence. 18marks

In 1984 the Police and Criminal Evidence Act (PACE) contains police powers. Inside PACE there are codes of practice found in Section 66.

One of the rights/safeguards is the criminal justice and public order act of 1994; this rule has been arranged and now on adverse inference can be drawn if the defendant remains silent. Another right is suspects have the right to make a phone call and have legal advice, under normal circumstances this is granted. However sometimes this might be postponed for up to 36hours because police believe that it would hinder the investigation, property could be disposed of. If not allowed
…show more content…
In R v Aspinall the court of appeal ruled that a schizophrenic defendant should have an appropriate adult present when being questioned even though the suspect appeared to understand the questions, the evidence was deemed inadmissible. However, an interview can begin without a solicitor or an appropriate adult if an officer of the rank of superintendent considers that delay will involve harm to persons or serious loss or damage to property. The defendant also has the right to silence as contained in the caution. The caution should be repeated before the interview begins. The caution must be repeated every time there is a break in questioning. This has been changed by the Criminal Justice and Public Order Act 1994. It provides that inferences may be drawn from the fact that a defendant has refused to answer police questions. Suspects also have the right to suitable conditions. There should only be one person in each cell, but only ‘so far as is practicable’. Police cells must be adequately heated, well lit and ventilated. Bedding should be clean and access to toilet and washing facilities must be provided. The suspect must be given adequate breaks for meals, refreshments and

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Section 24 of PACE sets out the grounds and authority police officers are entitled to in order to make an arrest. These powers were amended in 2005 by the Serious Organised Crime and Police Act 2005 (SOCPA). As a result a new section was added to section 24 therefore enabling the police to arrest anyone who;…

    • 835 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In order for an admission to be admissible in court, prior to interrogation, the individual must first be informed in clear and unequivocal terms that he has the right to remain silent. In addition, the warning to remain silent must be accompanied by the explanation that anything can be used against the individual in court, and that the individual has the right to have an attorney present during interrogation, and if they can not afford one, then one will be appointed to them. Also, if the individual waives his right to remain silent and for counsel to be present, the police must show that the waiver was made knowingly, voluntarily, and intelligently.…

    • 765 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The Supreme Court decision of 1966 of Miranda dictated a specific practice and conduct that law enforcement had to comply with when dealing with criminal suspects. It established that law enforcement was demanded to advise arrested persons or suspects of criminal acts that they have the right to remain silent, that anything they say may be used against them, and they have the right to an attorney. If they were not informed of these rights then a violation had occurred under the 5th Amendment regarding self-incrimination.…

    • 1197 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    On the first half of the interview, Cox and Allison, were certain about their testimony. After long hours of interrogation, the two witnesses have complied with the police’s story to avoid conflict and to be released from custody. The witnesses have also become suggestible during the interrogation, they have answered falsely in some leading questions to please the interviewer. An interview with an should not give any kind of stress to the witness. The police should help the witnesses remember by keeping them relax and asking relevant questions instead of using the coercive Reid…

    • 589 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Superior Court ruled that the appeal should be allowed, and that this evidence should be considered inadmissible since the accused chose not to make any statements - he was practicing his right to remain silent. The police violated his right under s. 7 of the Charter by tricking him into opposing his decision, which then made the trial unjust. An undercover police officer must serve the purpose of observation of suspects, rather than actively drawing out evidence or information in violation of the person’s right to remain silent. Seeing as the statements were the only piece of evidence the Crown had in order to be able to prove the individual guilty, it’s evident that under the current conditions, it’s the admission of the evidence rather…

    • 138 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Amendments 1-27

    • 318 Words
    • 2 Pages

    You have the right to consult an attorney before speaking to the police and to have an attorney present during questioning now or in the future.…

    • 318 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Apendix D

    • 355 Words
    • 3 Pages

    |Court jurisdiction is determined by age |The purpose of the procedures is to punish |receive Miranda warnings. |…

    • 355 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The criminal justice system works in such a way that certain behavior or actions are legislated as a criminal offense wherein the state or the federal government can prosecute an offender even if only being suspected. In this case, there exists rules or limits into which protection are of highest concerns. It does not only apply to civilian suspects but also extends to actual prisoners, and to those who are on parole and under probation. But in reality, it has become a worldwide issue in terms of illegal searches. It has even been stipulated in the U.S. Constitution 's Bill of Rights stating that these restrictions start on the premises of the rights to refuse to testify against oneself, the right to confront one 's accuser and the right to a trial by jury for people charged with crimes. But these federal protections may not always seem to hold especially when police enforcers are dealing with prisoners, people on parole and on probation status. This happens because the jurisdictions regarding these matters depend on the ruling court. The court regulates and decides whether the legislative rule, court practice or police action is permissible under the federal and state constitutional law. From here, we can say during the course of searches, we should be aware and vigilant of possible violations by the apprehending police officers. In such cases, knowledge of the legality, technicality and the law should at least be required or at least explained to the person being searched. As mentioned a while ago, the case becomes quite sensitive for people who are imprisoned, on parole and under probation. The situation for them is very difficult in the sense that they are…

    • 2812 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Compare and contrast the Police powers under the Mental Health Act 1983 and the Mental Capacity Act 2005.…

    • 1321 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Discretion within the criminal trial process is a very important matter, as the judge or magistrate must exercise appropriate measures in order to reach a just verdict. For example the evidence presented in trial must be approved by the Judge or Magistrate in case the evidence used in court appears inadmissible or prejudicial. The Evidence Act 1995 applies court discretion within the trial process as it allows for the quality of fairness. Without the exercise of impartiality within the trial process the decision made by the jury may alter the final…

    • 453 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    When being questioned a suspect under the age of 18 has the right to have a responsible adult present with them. In Australia, the accused has the right to a fair trial and is encouraged to have adequate legal representation to ensure justice for them. The offer of legal aid improves this right giving the access for a defendant to receive a fair trial by contributing to the cost of a lawyer or providing the legal representative. A limited police power relates to interviewing an accused if they are aged under 18 years which is displayed in Tang’s case. The rights and special protections of young people are different to adults.…

    • 689 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Inmates Rights Paper

    • 1327 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Privacy while incarcerated is one right that cannot be effectively provided to individuals. Using the balance test, courts have determined an…

    • 1327 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Interrogation has proven to be an effective means of seeking information since it involves giving a suspect an opportunity to express him or herself to prove their innocence. The suspects, however, should be informed of their rights and the consequences based on the information they provide. Failure to this, any information acquired from a suspect is regarded as inadmissible as evidence in a court of law. The United States constitution provides a legal standard into how interrogations are conducted through rights such as the presence of counsel and right against self-incrimination. Despite the measures put to guide interrogation procedures, interrogation techniques have evolved from establishing a rapport with the suspect to outright torture. However, effective interrogation techniques should obtain the required information while preserving the rights of the suspect.…

    • 956 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    It is important that citizens have a suitable way of implementing their constitutional rights against the government; those rights may be emphasized both offensively and defensively. For example a person accused of committing a crime has a series of rights which are guaranteed by the U.S. Constitution and state laws. Therefore, if you have been accused of a crime, just how do you know if your rights have been…

    • 791 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Rights Of Inmates Essay

    • 442 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Cruel and Unusual Punishment: Every inmate has the right to be free under the Eighth Amendment from inhumane treatment or anything that could be considered "cruel and unusual" punishment. Unfortunately, the Eighth Amendment did not clearly define what "cruel and unusual" punishment includes, meaning much of the definition has derived from case law. Generally speaking, any punishment that is considered inhumane treatment, like torture or abuse, or violation of a person's basic dignity may be considered cruel and unusual within the discretion of the court.…

    • 442 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays