Preview

Robber Barons Research Paper

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
667 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Robber Barons Research Paper
robber barons or captains of industry
I thought that people like Andrew Carnegie, John D. Rockefeller, and J.p Morgan were all robber barons. Because they would employ people and put them in these unsafe, and unsanitary conditions. Also they made education for immigrants coming in difficult because even though they built libraries and hospitals would the immigrants would be illiterate and not be able to pay for hospital bills. Lastly theses men were robber barons because they were using vertical integration and horizontal integration to take over small businesses and to raise prices on railroads.
Firstly when immigrants were coming over they had no food, no home, no job so they would work for very low wages;that does not mean that the conditions in the workplace have to be unsafe and people like Andrew carnegie he was just exploiting the immigrants by making them work for seven-days a week , and daily work 12 or more hours. They were also not entitled to vacation, sick leave, unemployment compensation, or reimbursement for injuries suffered on the job. Lastly it was not only adult workers in the factories children as young as 4 would be working in these factories “an average of 675
…show more content…
But What carnegie, rockefeller, and morgan did was they made libraries and hospitals. If you think about the immigrants and the natives are all illiterate to by building these library it was not to give better opportunities to the immigrants it was to put their names on another building. I think that it is a nasty circle of corruption because the robber barons would work these people day and night and choose to make things like hospitals which because they are on such low wages and don’t get reimbursement for injuries suffered at the job they could never afford to get them medical care. So all the “ good things” that these robber barons built they were just another building to put there name

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    In the nineteenth century, there were two industrialists and one of them was the Captain of Industry. But, we’re going to focus on the Robber Baron, they’re known more for their dirty work. Some examples are bad political practices, business reforms, and treated their workers poorly in terms of labor. Many people don’t know what these industrialist did to the public to gain their wealth, but now you’ll know the bitter truth.…

    • 412 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    John D. Rockefeller has earned a spot in the hall of shame. He became wealthy because of ruthless and dishonorable business tactics which then hurt the nation. Rockefeller became wealthy because, he lowered his prices way down and forced the Pennsylvania Railroad to lower their prices, and he also ran smaller companies out of business and then took them over for his own. After he took over most of the smaller businesses, he raised his own prices back up in order to bring in a bigger profit. Rockefeller’s robber baron side was reflected by this action because, he went behind people’s backs and turned the other way when it came to business partners.…

    • 379 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Robber Barons was the negative term for the titans of industry or, as Professor Donald Miller calls them, the capitalist conquistadors. These were the guys like Andrew Carnegie, Cornelius Vanderbilt, Gustavus Swift, Philip Armour, John D. Rockefeller and others who rose to the top and ran monopolies or near-monopolies in the Gilded Age (1870s-1900ish). They were seen as bad because they employed ruthless methods to run competion out of the market, but on the other hand, weren't breaking any laws or rules in this laissez faire timeperiod. These guys also gave a lot of money away: Carnegie built tons of libraries, and Carnegie Mellon University got a lot from him,…

    • 273 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    2000 Dbq Analysis

    • 972 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Carnegie did believe in survival of the fittest and that the rich was more competent and educated than the poor, middle class but, he also believed in aiding the less fortunate in a non-direct way by “ ...bringing to their service his superior wisdom, experience and ability to administer,...”(Doc 4). In controlling multiple industries he provided the less fortunate with jobs and work experience, bettering them in a non-direct way. John D. Rockefeller on the other hand believed in boosting himself using horizontal integration, monopolizing the smaller businesses, expanding his industry further and further. Rockefeller once had monopolized almost 90% of the oil and oil refining businesses. He lowered his prices to attract a customer base slowly eliminating all of his competitors by either buying them out or forcing them out of business, to then jack up his prices once he owned most of the industry. Because of his monopoly in the oil industry he and the railroad tycoon Vanderbilt were in league together giving “discriminating rates” to outside , small business competitors (Doc 7). In 1890 the Sherman Antitrust Act was passed to…

    • 972 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    What is an entrepreneur? An entrepreneur is a risk-taking businessperson or somebody who initiates or finances new commercial enterprises. Is it so that there are two types of them? In my opinion, I believe that the two types do exist. According to the Book, “The Myth of the Robber Barons”, there are successful entrepreneurs: market entrepreneur and political entrepreneur.…

    • 573 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    I believe that John D. Rockefeller should be viewed as a Robber Baron because he used illegal tactics to gain his wealth and he destroyed any competition he had. Therefore, that makes him a robber baron.…

    • 256 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    what is the accurate way to view the capitalist business leaders of the gilded age? they did care much for the people but more for the money they would make off the people. even though these people did not try to make a change the outcomes of their decisions made a difference in our lives today.where the capitalist robber baron or were they captains of industry? The term Robber Baron comes from the idea that the capitalists of the late 19th century were greedy, selfish and power-hungry. This comes from the fact that they ruthlessly grew their economic empires into monopolies that crushed the competition. So capitalist would be considered both Robber Barons and Captains of Industry. Progressivism began as a social movement and grew into a political…

    • 146 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Robber Barons Dbq Analysis

    • 1056 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The time period from 1870 until 1900 has been called the Gilded Age. This name coined by Mark Twain speaks volumes to what was occurring at the time. The big businesses were rising and along with them technological progress and a lower cost of living; this is the gold plating. Also during this time, corruption was running rampant and poor workers were exploited in order to produce more for their robber baron bosses; this is the gold layer peeled back. Big businesses played a massive role in the economy and politics during the gilded age, as the trusts made the U.S. into a manufacturing powerhouse and they corrupted politicians into not acting on injustices, leading to varying responses from the people such as unionizing, protesting, or rioting.…

    • 1056 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    -Robber Barron: Used to describe a businessman that used ruthless business tactics to amass a huge personal wealth.…

    • 447 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Gordon interpret the events of the 1800’s entirely different. Both present strong arguments using facts; However, Zinn’s use of statistics makes his argument slightly stronger. To the contrary, both manipulate the facts to support their agendas, which imposes a weakness in their writing styles. A well-rounded argument offers both perspectives on one topic so that the reader can make his or her own inferences. Zinn’s argument screams socialism; while he bashes big business for the sake of the people, he barely refers to the cruel endeavors of the workers. Zinn could have made his argument stronger by referring less to government-corporate relationships and more to worker-corporate relationships. He, also, refuses to see any good in the robber barons’ philanthropy. Similarly, Gordon refuses to acknowledge the effect of big business on the workers in its entirety. However, he does show the opposition’s perspective in his article when he refers to the corporate-competition relationship. With that being said, one can infer that not one author is correct in his opinion of the big businessmen; big business was cruel and kind through their philanthropist…

    • 1182 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Robber Barons Men

    • 169 Words
    • 1 Page

    These 3 men are robber barons because they all treated their men with disrespect. They made them work in harsh conditions, with low pay, and super long hours. They also discouraged unions between the workers and even tried to stop them.This is showing disrespect by them not letting the workers have a break and time to themselves.What they don't realize is no matter how much they get nagged they aren't going to work to their greatest potential because their worn out.Another thing that's cruel is giving them low pay after working all these hours,they may be doing it to save their own money but out of the millions they have they should be giving them a decent amount of money.With them working their workers so hard, it will make them quit then…

    • 169 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Because they used vicious tactics to destroy competition and created monopolies, the industrial leaders of the late nineteenth century are sometimes called robber barons. Enforcing harsh rules, ordering long work hours, and harsh treatment of employees gave them their names as robber barons. They were thought to have greatly abused their power. They knew that the skilled and unskilled workers of the factories had to work in order to survive. They also knew that they could get off cheap and pay them less because the workers had to work and would work for whatever pay possible. Because of this, the workers had to work long, hard hours. This was true corruption of the workers, as well as greed on the industrial leaders' parts. By paying off the political parties, the industrialists were able to have laws passed that were favorable to their needs, regardless of the hurt it caused the workers. The industrialists, even though they helped America become a great economic power, sacrificed morals, in order to achieve their wealth. That was what established them as robber barons.…

    • 654 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Furthermore, the captains of industry were robber barons because they gave their workers low wages. For instance, wage disputes have been the single most common cause of strikes in the United States. From this evidence the reader can conclude that not being paid at a fair enough price can cause an terrible amount of damage to people and the nation as a whole. Another example is that in times of economic depression, layoffs, and wage cuts angered the workers, leading to violent labor conflicts in 1877 and 1894. To clarify, this means that people serve to be treated with the upmost respect and shouldn't be paid different amounts of money. Obviously, this is why the captains of industry are robber…

    • 121 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Throughout the late 19th century a group of men held control over the economy of the United States. This group consisted of men who were beyond wealthy. They owned almost every facet of the economy through monopolism and other practices that are not considered legal. With the government of the time partaking in what is called laissez faire capitalism, these men were allowed to begin building what could be considered an empire without federal interference. Notable examples of such men included under the title of robber barons were Cornelius Vanderbilt, Andrew Carnegie, J.P. Morgan, John D. Rockefeller, Jay Gould, Jim Fisk, and Russel Sage along with many others. (McNamara)…

    • 673 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    J P Morgan and Andrew Carnegie were two powerful men; disciplined, intelligent, and hard workers. President Roosevelt described J P Morgan as a sincere and trustful man. He developed a social and professional confidence, and his corpulent body and deep black eyes were intimidating. He was born as a natural leader. In the other hand Andrew Carnegie was compassionate, ethic, humble, a truth optimistic. His mother taught him the value of hard work. “He was devoted to his mother and deeply lover her.” (www.biography.com, minute10’55’). He believed in qualities of all men.…

    • 685 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays