As a criminologist advisor to a member of the state legislation, it is important that any recommendation be extremely solid. In my opinion, an extremely solid recommendation is not based solely on popularity; it is based primarily on statistics. Armed robbery is violent offense that can have a devastating effect on a person’s life. These crimes are detrimental to the growth of society, which means that society needs to do as much as possible to decrease these acts of violence. It would be nearly impossible to eliminate armed robberies completely but that does not mean that it should not be attempted. After careful consideration and tedious research it is my recommendation that anyone convicted without reasonable doubt by their peers in a court of law of armed robbery should have to serve double the maximum prison term.
This type of deterrence, I believe, will prove to have successful results. According to the Federal Bureau of Investigation’s Unified Crime Report, guns were used to commit armed robberies a majority of the time. The Unified Crime Report recorded that guns were used in 42.6 percent of all reported armed robberies, knives were used 7.7 percent of the time, dangerous weapons were reportedly used 8.7 percent of the time, and the remaining 41.1 percent of robberies were by brute force or strong arm tactics. The Federal Bureau of Investigation defines armed robbery as taking or attempting to take anything of value from the care, custody, or control of a person or persons by force or threat of force or violence and/or by putting the victim in fear (FBI, 2010).
You May Also Find These Documents Helpful
-
In this case it was obvious that armed robbery is a dangerous felony. However, the fact that Pulido killed the victim before the money was taken could give the defense the argument that, maybe Pulido had beef with his victim. The killing could have been due to some long standing grudge or other issue. The only problem is the testimony of Pulidos Uncle that showed the defendants intent to rob the gas station first. The court could then come to the conclusion that the killing occurred during the armed robbery of the gas…
- 840 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
There formal name varies from state to state. I have decided to view the new bill that was giving to see if something needs to be fixed. According to the Uniform Crime Report (UCR), “armed robbery is defined as an aggravated form of robbery in which the defendant is armed with a dangerous weapon.” According to FB1 (2012)’’ There were an estimated 354,520 robberies nationwide in 2012. The 2012 estimated number of robberies decreased 0.1 percent from the 2011 estimate and 20.1 percent from the 2008 estimate”. Since 2012 robbery has increased and it will continue to increase until something is done about the situation. According to the FBI Uniform Crime Reports(2012), “447,403 robberies were reported to the police at the rate of one per minute in the United States. This is an increase of 7.2% over 2005. Robberies varied according to region with the Southern States having the highest percentage of 38.3%, the Western States 23.6%, the Northeastern States 18.5%, and the Midwestern States at 19.5%. Robbery rates did not vary drastically from month-to-month, however, August and October had the highest rate with February and April having the lowest…
- 739 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
Answer to Question 1 a. What is the trend of murder 1960-2012?-The rate of murder over the years remained fairly constant and only slight changes were reported. The rate of murder in 1960 is almost equal to that in 2012. b. How can one explain the trend of Forcible Rape? - From the 1960s up to 1990 the rate of forcible started going down. This is attributable to the increase in police vigilance, community police, and the possible increase in the jail terms for forcible rape.…
- 1012 Words
- 5 Pages
Better Essays -
In both instances the criminals attacked targets that they believed would soft easy for them to rob; however, they were thwarted by a gun owner. This could also be prevented with open carry as most criminals will decide against attacking their target if they cannot do it without themselves getting injured or killed. Open carry also allows the individual carrying to draw their firearm faster than if it was concealed. More than often criminals would rather be confronted by a police officer than an armed individual as many police officers will show more control and will be less likely to shoot the…
- 1362 Words
- 6 Pages
Good Essays -
This however is not so due to the fact most people that commit violent crimes do not use a gun that they obtained legally. Of the guns used in violent crimes 39.6% were obtained from a friend or relative, 39.2 % from the street or an illegal source, 0.7% at a gun show, 1.0% from a flea market, and 3.8 % from a pawn shop (Olmstead, J. S.). All of these circumstances do not require the criminal to go through a background check which would most likely not allow them to obtain the weapon. With these numbers it only leaves 8.3% of criminals obtaining their guns legally (Olmstead, J. S.). This shows that by making it harder to obtain weapons it only hurts the law abiding citizens from being able to protect themselves.…
- 2498 Words
- 10 Pages
Better Essays -
As a Criminologist Advisor to the State Legislature, I have been chosen to provide a prison term policy on armed robbery. Currently the legislature will soon be voting on a bill that would double the maximum prison term for anyone convicted of armed robbery. First I would like to define what the legal definition of armed robbery is as defined by the Black's Law Dictionary which is: an aggravated form of robbery in which the defendant is armed with a dangerous weapon, though it is not necessary to prove that he used the weapon to effectuate the robbery. The taking of property from person or presence of another by use of force or by threatening use of force while armed with a dangerous weapon (Black's Law Dictionary, 6th Edition).…
- 2036 Words
- 9 Pages
Good Essays -
This leads me to believe that there would be less violence with stricter gun laws . These laws would include extensive background checks on the people who buy the guns, longer waiting periods, and mental health evaluations to ensure guns stay out of the wrong hands. Proponents of stricter guns laws believe mass shootings and other violent crimes would decrease with stricter gun control but opponents believe making guns harder to get will take away our second amendment right to bear arms and that if everyone had a gun they would be able to protect themselves and that in itself would reduce…
- 1234 Words
- 5 Pages
Good Essays -
In fact, the FBI has released statistics that show that more people are killed by weapons other that guns, such as clubs and hammers. (Stand) If you think that banning guns will take them out of the hands of criminals, you’re mistaken. It has been proven that criminals don’t obey the rules that our society has put into place. They will get their hands on them through the black market, and then because we banned guns law abiding citizens will be defenseless. Imagine this scenario. You’re at Whataburger, a restaurant that has banned guns, enjoying a nice burger with your best friend. You look up from your conversation, and a man has walked in. He is wearing a black ski mask, and your stomach drops. He has an illegal gun, and it’s pointed right at you. “Hands up!” He shouts. No one moves in your defense, they just comply with the masked man’s order. The good people have left their weapons in the car, or at home to respect the company’s decision to have a gun free zone. You’re left at the mercy of this stranger, whose intentions are quite clear. Now imagine if the company hadn’t banned guns in their restaurant. That man sitting in the corner booth has his concealed handgun license, and could’ve stopped the crime as soon as the masked man had walked in. “You can’t blame an inanimate object that’s availability has absolutely no correlation to murder and expect it to end violence.”…
- 720 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
Government assumes that if society confines gun control that criminal activity will be reduced, however, offenders generally aim for victims who are unarmed. This would make it effortless for the criminal to assault a bystander while it leaves the victim vulnerable.Controlling weapons will not keep them out of felon’s hands. Each individual has the entitlement to protect themselves against unjustified acts. Righteous residents would have a sense of security knowing that firearms could be carried legally for his or her own protection and safety. A decrease in rifle sales, along with ammunition, will damage a state’s economy. Aside from criminal abuse, firearms are valued for friendly competitions and hunting purposes. Individuals who possess guns are put to a challenge to see if they can handle true responsibility. Besides regulating firearms completely, there are other alternatives to resolve gun…
- 494 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
There are several strategies that can dramatically reduce cases of gun violence. First, there are no reasons for citizens to purchase any type of semi-automatic or assault weapons. Instead, they should only be able to purchase handguns for protection purposes. Allowing citizens to purchase assault weapons only translates into providing support for people that have wrong intentions. Because these weapons are easily available, people who intend to cause harm can obtain one and carry out their plan. This is why it is very crucial to ban citizens from purchasing weapons that can inflict substantial damage. Although handguns can also cause great damage, they are less…
- 740 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
Interestingly enough the National Institute of Justice has a list of programs that have been implemented in US history to deter the gun violence in America. Programs such as : Operation ceasefire, Directed Police Patrol, Strategic Approaches to Community Safety Initiative, and Project safe neighborhood are all meant as programs for the prevention of gun violence. These programs have proven to help quite a bit, but the issue of gun violence is still here. The only way to truly prevent gun violence is to take the weapon…
- 1888 Words
- 8 Pages
Good Essays -
Limiting the accessibility of guns is a step in the right direction, despite the fact that people are going to find a way to get a gun if they want one, making it harder to obtain them will in some way decrease the amount of violence that is caused by a person in possession of a gun. As a result of the recent increase in mass shootings, many Americans in a way have become desensitized, they tune in for details, watch what goes on for a couple of days, but many people do not really care anymore than they would about their favorite TV show (source D Manson). We have change this and make it clear that these tragedies are happening in our communities and they should taken seriously rather than like just another news…
- 451 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
Guns do a lot of bad, but do a lot more good for society. Banning guns will not stop the problem, but will just make it worse. Guns are apart of our society as Americans they have been around since colonial years, and are not leaving anytime soon. “The number of guns in America has increased by more than 50 percent since 1993, and in that same period the gun homicide rate in the United States has dropped by half. (Kristof, The Times).” Guns offer protection for individuals. One day you could be in the wrong place at the wrong time, and a shooting breaks out, you will pray there is someone else there with a concealed firearm to help control the situation while waiting for police to arrive. They can’t do that if guns are banned. “We need to understand that we cannot stop crimes and murders. And banning guns would be a step, or two, backwards instead of moving forward in the right direction (The Times News).” The research conducted to produce this paper was drawn from a multitude of sources all with different…
- 1133 Words
- 5 Pages
Better Essays -
Gun control and gun rights have been an issue that has been debated for decades. Whenever there has been a mass shooting of any magnitude, it seems that the debate heats up even more. Consideration must be given as to what the benefits are of these gun control laws. Gun control laws must also be written as to not violate the Second Amendment of the Constitution as well. There have been many studies accomplished to determine if gun control laws actually do reduce the amount of violent crimes. These studies have discovered that there is no link between gun control laws and violent crime reduction. Even though most individuals have their different views on gun control, most seem to believe that the current laws do not have an effect on violent crimes. The hypothesis of gun control does not have an effect of reducing violent crimes was tested and the hypothesis is supported by the data collected within this thesis. The data used was collected from studies by other individuals, a survey of the public opinion, and other statistics recorded from previous years of violent crimes.…
- 8926 Words
- 36 Pages
Powerful Essays -
Its very rare to see someone robbing without a gun. “41.4 robberies have been used with a firearm,” said by the FBI. Guns are almost half of what people rob people with in the u.s. And it's a very scary thing to think about because in 2010 there was more than quarter of a million robberies. If the government gets rid of gun control there will be way less robberies in the U.S. and that would help america out very much so.…
- 528 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays