Cunningham.
Cunningham.
Robin Mason is a 35-year-old, who lives in Kansas whose Father, Thomas Shaw, 58 years old was in an auto accident on October 22, 2016 he was then hospitalized for 3 weeks and released to go home. He spent 2.5 weeks at home and then had trouble breathing, went to the hospital and died shortly thereafter.…
Issues: Throughout the trail process on behalf of the court the inquiry for exceptions to the charge inaccuracy developed regarding instructions. The appellant was seeking a claim based of the defense of his alibi.…
CPSW received a phone call from Ms. Borkovec mentioning that Mr. Blair-Foster may go back to jail if he does not follow through with his PO's recommendation which is following through with CPSW. Ms. Borkovec sounded upset with Mr. Blair Foster's PO and stated that she would like to meet with this writer and discuss about her concerns. Ms, Borkovec stated that Mr. Blair-Foster does not need to follow the case plan and he does not need to go to Jail neither. CPSW scheduled appointments for both Ms. Borkovec and Mr. Blair-Foster on 10/26/16 at 3:30pm. Goal 1-2…
Victor Daniel Williams was accused of robbing a Victoria pizza parlour in October of 1993. The accused pleaded not guilty of this crime. Williams was of Aboriginal decent, the issue of prejudice became a factor in the case. Due to this, there was inquiry on whether or not he would be able to question the jury, challenge for cause, to make sure that they were impartial about his heritage. In his first trial, Hutchinson J. ruled in favour of the challenge for cause. This allowed two questions to be asked to the jury. For “procedural errors”, the Crown applied for a mistrial. This angered Williams saying the purpose of the mistrial was to underside the challenge for cause. Regardless, the mistrial was granted. When the second trial was put in…
The facts in this case are that Harvey Pierce ambushed and shot Robin Kerl and her fiancé David Jones in the parking lot of a Madison Wal-Mart where Kerl and Jones worked. Kerl was seriously injured in the shooting, and Jones was killed. Pierce, who was Kerl’s former boyfriend, then shot and killed himself. At the time of the shooting, Pierce was a work-release inmate at the Dane County jail who was employed at a nearby Arby’s restaurant operated by Dennis Rasmussen, INC. Pierce had left work without permission at the time of the attempted murder and murder/suicide. Kerl and Jones’ estate sued DRI and Arby’s, INC. As in pertinent to this appeal, the plaintiffs alleged that Arby’s is vicariously liable, as DRI’s negligent supervision of Pierce. The circuit court granted summary judgment in favor of Arby’s, concluding that there was no basis for vicarious liability. The court appeals affirmed.…
Judge and jury, I beg thee to charge Ms. Maloney with the murder of Patrick Maloney. Why would the perfectly stable Mary Maloney randomly decide to kill her husband? What would cause a perfectly sane woman to do such a heinous crime? As you are aware, Patrick Maloney was a well-respected member of the police force. To all who knew him he was a good man. He never had any enemies, and was very committed to his job. So how did this good man end up dead? Supposedly, Mr. Maloney was alleged of having an affair. However, Mr. Maloney is no longer around to testify to that fact. If Ms. Maloney had heard of this alleged affair, maybe that drove her to murder him. There is sufficient evidence showing that Ms. Maloney was the murderess. Number one, there…
Now lets begin to dive in on how the investigation unfolded and how investigators judges witnesses and doctors all went about handling this it all…
Mary Barnett, the mother of a six month old daughter, left for San Francisco to see her fiancé. Leaving her daughter behind, she returned seven days later to find her child dead. After calling the police and telling them she left the child with a baby sitter, she later told them this was not true and that she left the daughter on purpose knowing the consequences. A trial was then conducted to determine if she would be convicted of second degree murder and be sentenced to 18 years. The witnesses and information they provided was laid before me and I am to determine with the evidence presented whether Mary Barnett is rightfully guilty or not guilty.…
2. List the questions raised about this situation or that you think that the investigators should ask of the maid.…
We need to explain how we will investigate the case. We have to make sure be back in touch with victim as soon as we have news or if any problems appear we have to let them know immediately.…
Since John was in custody, what are the procedural steps the police were required to take once John began to incriminate himself? The police have no obligation to stop John Doe from making any statements. “Excited Utterance” made by a defendant before being questioned are admissible as statements given under Miranda advisement. Once the police begin to question John Doe regarding the theft, then they are required to read or provide Mr. Doe with his Miranda Warnings. Miranda rights (Miranda rule, Miranda warning) n. the requirement set by the U. S. Supreme Court in Miranda v. Alabama (1966) that prior to the time of arrest and any interrogation of a person suspected of a crime, he/she must be told that he/she has: "the right to remain silent, the right to legal counsel, and the right to be told that anything he/she says can be used in court against" him/her. Further, if the accused person confesses to the authorities, the prosecution must prove to the judge that the defendant was informed of them and knowingly waived those rights, before the confession can be introduced in the defendant's criminal trial. The warnings are known as "Miranda Rights" or just "rights." The Miranda rule supposedly prevents self-incrimination in violation of the Fifth Amendment to the U. S. Constitution. Sometimes there is a question of admissibility of answers to questions made by the defendant before he/she was considered a prime suspect, raising a factual issue as to what is a prime suspect and when does a person become such a suspect?…
Melissa Kimball, the former client's mother, returned the Ombudsman telephone call former earlier this week. The Ombudsman has not been able to make contact with the Caitlyn's mother. The Ombudsman called Melissa Kimball's cellphone today, yet Ms. Melissa Kimball was not available to receive his incoming call. The Ombudsman provided Melissa Kimball with a voice message with his contact…
One of the Domestic Violence Death Review Team’s first considerations was that of the confidentiality of the cases they were to review and analyze. All members are and were required to sign a confidentiality agreement. In 1994 and 1996, California Legislation was enacted to solidify their formation and establish framework for the…
McDonough, E. T. (2013). Death Investigations. In R. M. Hammer, B. Moynihan, & E. M. Pagliaro, Forensic nursing: a handbook for practice (2nd ed., pp. 215-258). Retrieved from http://tinyurl.com/bwp5r2r…
If a response is provided by Casey about the proposed sentencing to the reporter it should relate directly to the data that was researched and analyzed in the presentence investigation report. Although this particular case is considered a high level crime the cause of the action is very clear. The individual suffered years of physical and sexual…