Despite the positive reports regarding robotic technology, it cannot be used as a complete replacement of traditional surgery. The American Congress of Obstetricians and Gynecologist in March 2013 held a press conference concerning robotic hysterectomy, “There is no good data proving that it is even as good as – let alone better – than existing minimally invasive alternatives” (Andrews). Current studies show that there is no significant difference between traditional laparoscopic methods and robotic-assisted surgeries in terms of procedure. Robotic surgery has simply dramatically decreased recovery time and pain post-surgery. Important factors such as blood transfusion rates and complications throughout the surgery are not minimized (Andrews). In fact, they may have been
Despite the positive reports regarding robotic technology, it cannot be used as a complete replacement of traditional surgery. The American Congress of Obstetricians and Gynecologist in March 2013 held a press conference concerning robotic hysterectomy, “There is no good data proving that it is even as good as – let alone better – than existing minimally invasive alternatives” (Andrews). Current studies show that there is no significant difference between traditional laparoscopic methods and robotic-assisted surgeries in terms of procedure. Robotic surgery has simply dramatically decreased recovery time and pain post-surgery. Important factors such as blood transfusion rates and complications throughout the surgery are not minimized (Andrews). In fact, they may have been