Coffee and Weddington fought on behalf of McCorvey, who went by the name 'Jane Roe' for the case. The three judges in the court agreed that the Texas law that made abortion illegal was unconstitutional based upon the legal aspects of the case and with backing of the 9th amendment. Even though the court came to that agreement, the state of Texas decided against the court and appealed the decision which lead the case to the Supreme …show more content…
Their argument was based on the 1st, 4th, 5th, 8th, 9th, and the 14th amendments. All of which have the common factor of privacy of an American citizen. The 9th and the 14th are the two main arguments during the case. The 9th amendment supports Roe's case because abortion is not clearly stated within the constitution, so the topic is saved for the people to decide. The due process clause of the 14th amendment supports legalizing abortion as well because it states that the state must respect all legal rights that are owned to a person. Coffee and Weddington fought that abortion was a part of a woman's right to privacy, which is a right owned to a person. According to just these two specific amendments, making abortion illegal would be considered unconstitutional. The Supreme Court finally ruled 7-2 in favor of