Preview

Role Of Good Parliamentary Scrutiny Of Government

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
831 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Role Of Good Parliamentary Scrutiny Of Government
Scrutiny of government can be defined as any activity that involves examining (and being prepared to challenge) the expenditure, administration and policies of the government of the day. The leader of the House of Commons, Robin Cook stated 'Good scrutiny makes for good government'. It often comprises scrutinising the wider context in which government is working. To examine and challenge the work of government is normally understood to be one of the three primary roles of Parliament, the rest of which are passing legislation and authorising the government to vote financial grant. This means that legally or by convention the scrutiny body can require the representative of government to explain or justify their individual or organisational decisions, …show more content…
One Select Commitee have a role that crosses departmental boundaries such as the Public Accounts or Environmental Audit Committees. Other Commons Committees are involved in a range of on-going investigation, for instance, administration of the House itseld or allegations about the conduct of individuals MPs. Good Parliamentary scrunity has significant potential to improve the effectiveness of government, shaping the way government goes about its business and succeeds or fails in achieving the outcomes it desires. Parliament committees are one of the key mechanisms used by Parliament to conduct …show more content…
These might include personal, political, constituency and parliamentary objectives as well as, or instead of, a wish to increase the effectiveness of government. But different types of inquiry are most effective at producing different sorts of outcome. So it is important for committees to agree what impact they are trying to achieve before they embark on an inquiry.
When thinking about impact there can be a tendency among committee staff and MPs to focus on reports which are the most frequent output from inquiries. Although government has committed to respond to reports produced by parliamentary committees, we found that it is often the process which the committee goes through in conducting its inquiry that has as much, if not more impact on government
The inquiry process can also shape the wider context in which the government has to respond to a report, by building pressure through media attention. James Arbuthnot MP observed that 'the government is more likely to respond to something that has a background of pressure put on the government from

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    M1 – Explain in detail the responsibilities of the different levels of government in the UK…

    • 729 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Parliament is the national representative body which has supreme legislative powers within its jurisdiction. While it oversees the completion of a number of other tasks parliaments’ main role is undoubtedly to make and pass laws and it has to be said that it achieves this role efficiently. Parliament and the members of parliament are elected solely by the people and are therefore responsible to the voting public. When passing laws parliament has the ability to, as part of its law making process obtain expert opinion with regards to tough and controversial issues. This process of law making is a completely structured procedure which follows a routine series of stages whenever a piece of legislation is proposed. These factors amongst others all contribute to the effective and efficient law making system that parliament is. While like any other structured organisation parliament has a number of weaknesses and faults these are minor and have very little effect on parliament as a law-making institution.…

    • 1245 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Law unit 2

    • 575 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Committee report- after a couple of days or weeks the committee gets back together including the members of parliament and the public and you. The committee will give back feedback to what they think about your bill.…

    • 575 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    It can be argued that Backbench MPs are effective due to their role working on Select Committees. Whilst working on Select Committees, backbenchers check and report on areas ranging from the work of government departments to economic affairs. This over-seeing and examination of executive work provides effective and detailed scrutiny. The scrutinizing of the government ensures its democratic legitimacy and therefore gives it the authority and right to exercise political power . Through Select Committees, backbench MPs have proven to be effective because their close examination of the execute has led to action being taken. An example of this is George Osborne’s 2012 Budget which propose a “Pasty-Tax” on UK hot, baked goods. Following intense scrutiny from the Treasury Select Committee,…

    • 1497 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The select committees have a very effective role as they have the power to question and cross examine ministers, their civil servants and any witnesses they may want to call from any external organisations. MPs gain a lot of knowledge and expertise while being in the select committees, which can be a very good thing as they are able to wisely question and analyse the policies that are being debated. They are able to request access to government papers, so they are able to increase their knowledge on the specific issue.…

    • 538 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    C) To what extent is the House of Commons effective in carrying out its various functions?…

    • 725 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The first sign that the Coalition has changed the relationship between the Executive and the Legislature would be the rising effectiveness and opportunity of scrutiny. Parliament’s role of scrutinizing the government has become extensive with the lack of majority in the House of Commons. With a majority in the government, MPs would usually support the governing party and there was less elbowroom for criticism. Parliamentary scrutiny has become most effective through Prime Minister’s question time, where the Parliament have a chance to hold the executive accountable every Wednesday, and The Wrights Reforms, brought about in 2010. This has made it harder for the government to pass legislation, as they can no longer use the select committees to ease the passage of legislation. The Wrights reforms changed the appointment of chairs of departmental and select committees to being elected by MPs rather than appointed by the Prime Minister. This has freed the select committees from the control of the whips and manipulation by the government. An example of the effectiveness would be when Theresa May faced difficult…

    • 787 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    An important point made in Weissert and Weissert concerning Congress and its committee structure is that the majority of the work in Congress is done through committees. They perform the majority of research on issues and possible solutions, get legislation written, re-written and amended, and support it as it moves through Congress and finally gets passed. They are the “workhorses of the legislature” (Weissert and Weissert, 29).…

    • 1148 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Secondly backbench MPs allow the current government to be made accountable to the electorate. Backbenchers can take part in scrutinising opposition, or even their own parties, during events such as the Prime Minister’s Question Time, where, for an allocated time, the PM is asked questions concerning anything. Select committees can also be used to scrutinise. For example the head of the Public Bills committee is always headed by a member of the opposition, currently Margaret Hodge. This is to ensure that they are effective and non-corrupted. Although MPs have the power to dissolve the current government, through a vote of no confidence (last one in 1979), MPs that standalone against their party by having controversial or independent thoughts on an issue, then they are brought into line by party whips which could result in having an MP who does not represent you adequately. It shows that MPs achieve more together.…

    • 630 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Although not mentioned in the Constitution Congressional committees have become an essential tool in Congress as its membership has increased and an expansion in government involvement in economic and social life has required a far greater volume of legislation and increased scrutiny of the executive. Select committees are permanent and therefore members of a committee who are re-elected gain a large amount of expertise in the policy area the committee deals with and a large amount of skill in executive scrutiny. The main functions of committees are the scrutiny of legislation in their field of speciality (N.B. this involves the power to stop a bill), the scrutiny of executive departments and basic 'housekeeping' and co-ordination roles. Congressional committees are powerful, well-funded, well-staffed (large numbers of researchers) and respected as important bodies. For this reason members want to serve; also they may advance in the party through good committee service and also through committee membership have a more powerful influence on the legislative process and may gain a degree of control over legislation of particular importance to their…

    • 1740 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Parliament is designed to hold the executive accountable; therefore it goes about this by various means of government scrutiny, such as Prime Minister’s Question Time. In addition, Parliament is expected to perform a legislative function, creating the process of a bill becoming a law after undergoing many stages between the House of Commons and the House of Lords. Finally, Parliament is also required to be representative of the nation, with constituencies creating a strong local link between the electorate and their MP.…

    • 1529 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Scrutiny is carried out in four main ways- Prime Ministers Questions, Select Committees, The Back Benches and The House of Lords. Prime Ministers Questions is a weekly opportunity for backbenchers to scrutinise the Prime Minister. This happens every Wednesday and is an opportunity for the leader of the opposition as well as other MPs to highlight government failings or ask the Prime Minister a question. This is a good way to scrutinise the Prime Minister as it puts them under pressure to justify their actions and normally with potentially no pre-warning of what topics will have to be defended. The element of surprise allows opposition MP’s as well as backbenchers and sometimes members of the cabinet to catch the prime minister out with an awkward question. The relative performance of each of the main party leaders is closely watched and each is under great pressure to get the better of their opponent. The main weakness of this form of scrutiny is that it is often accused of being more like ‘Gardeners’ Question Time’ as many believe the questions are “planted” and therefore the Prime Minister and Opposition can prepare their answers beforehand.…

    • 1636 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    With democracy on the incline and other countries catching up to where the UK once lead it can be argued that parliament does not carry out its functions adequately. Many would say there are not enough checks and balances on the government to insure its parliament is run legitimately being argued that a cross on a ballot paper every four years is hardly a true expression of our will. Current circumstances have lead to his enquiry of the people, most significantly the freedom of information act 2000 introduced by Blair’s government allowing transparency and putting the government under some scrutiny resulted in the daily telegraphy uncovering the expense scandal, including the duck house this exploitation of the government sparked an unanimous felling of not only anger but also disappointment bringing the questioning of the effectiveness of parliament. However not all of parliament can be looked upon in negative light, parliament can be seen as efficient and it is unfair to claim that “none” of its functions are adequate because the surely there would be a collapse in parliament and government.…

    • 1616 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Select committees and their introduction in 1979 have much increased the effectiveness of the House of Commons both in its legislative function (partaking in the process of a bill becoming a law) and also to hold executive to account. Select committees can call for ‘persons, papers and records’ and after reforms made by the previous Labour government in 2000 they are now appointed by an independent body. These committees have had a majority of successes including the government’s Arms-to-Africa…

    • 843 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Thompson, Paul. "Beauty Pageant Girl, Eight, given Botox by Her Mother Is Taken into Care." Daily Mail UK. N.p., 17 May 2011. Web. 18 Nov. 2014. <http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1387671/Kerry-Campbell-gave-daughter-Britney-8-botox-loses-social-services.html>.…

    • 2042 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays