Preview

Rome And Carthage Research Paper

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
394 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Rome And Carthage Research Paper
UNIVERSITY OF THE PEOPL E
Learning Journal Unit Five
Briefly discuss how the governments of Rome and Carthage differed.
We have learned a lot about the governments of Rome and that of Carthage in the reading of this week. It was made it clear in the reading and through other materials studied; “Carthage undoubtedly is of great importance to the roman civilization,” (nd). Ultimately, it is seen as the fiercest enemy to the Roman civilization. At the end of the Republic though, Carthage became Rome’s biggest rival and enemy. These battles were to identify which one will gain the supremacy or dominion over the world. Being aware of the impact of those wars, the Romans had done the essential by winning the fight; something that resulted in the
…show more content…
Carthage, on the other hand, is a republic comparable to an oligarchy, (nd). Rome was almost a land-based military; while “Carthage's military system was more well-balanced and appeared to be the most powerful one in this time. Therefore Carthage as power could draw its troops across from the Mediterranean, region that includes Iberia (the actual Spain) and the North Africa.Romans and Carthaginians had different religious beliefs. “Romans worshipped Greek’s God and the Carthaginians worshipped Phoenicians gods.” The article went on to say that “Rome was stronger in land army and Carthage stronger in navy. Rome was a representative government Carthage was a republican government Rome was stronger in Land army Carthage was strong in navy.”
These are just some differences between the government of Rome and that of Carthage
References:
Steeve, R., (2011). Carthage and Rome – An Early Clash of Civilization. Retrieved from: https://59steps.wordpress.com/2011/04/11/carthage-and-rome-an-early-clash-of-civilisations/
William C. Morey, (1901). Ph.D., D.C.L. Outline of Roman History.
New York, Cincinnati, Chicago: American Book Company. Retrieved from:

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    In 500 years of no nation has everything stayed the same and Rome is no exception. While the economics of Rome managed to stay the same between 100 and 600 CE, and the laws of Rome with it, government and religion in 600 CE would not be recognizable to leaders and civilians from 100 CE.…

    • 689 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    At that moment, an agreement with Carthage officially confirmed the rule of Rome among the other Latin nations (The Roman conquest, n.d.). In order to regard Rome as an equal, these city states generated an alliance known as the Latin League, which was supposed to ensure appropriate equal authority and unity of goals (The Roman conquest, n.d.). I pondered whether Rome feared the Latin League would grow stronger and desired to control it if, like Athens and Sparta, Rome and the League were equally powerful. Indeed, the members of the League challenged one another for hegemony after Etruscan authority over Rome and the other Latium states collapsed (The Roman conquest, n.d.). In this sense, Rome's goals against the Italian city-states and Carthage would have been quite similar to Sparta's goals during the Peloponnesian…

    • 404 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Hannibal’s overall war strategy in Italy, or lack thereof, can be seen as a strong contributing factor to Carthage’s ultimate defeat in the Second Punic War. Livy describes, “Hannibal…without orders from the senate, crossed both the Alps and the Ebro.” Demonstrating his defiance of Carthaginian Government’s ambitions against Rome. Ultimately, Hannibal sought not to destroy Rome but to “create a balance of power with [her]” according to Fronda. This is to suggest that rather than conquer Rome, Hannibal wanted to be on the same playing field in order to deny them the opportunity to claim hegemony over the Mediterranean. The content of the Macedonian–Carthaginian Treaty further evidences Hannibal’s lack of intention to destroy Rome as, in multiple sections, it discusses how Rome will be treated and acknowledges their…

    • 647 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The respective form of government of Rome and Carthage has an "outward similarity" in terms of structure. If Rome has two consuls, Carthage on other hand has two chief magistrates called as suffetes. Carthaginians have also a legislative body such like the Roman Senate which is called the hundreds or "the counsel of thirty Nobles" (Mackay, 1999). In addition, it has also a citizen assembly similar to Rome's comitia (Moray,1901). In governmental organization the two two great nations were parallel to each other, however in terms of the internal affairs of their respective states they were entirely antipodal.…

    • 594 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Roman Empire Dbq Essay

    • 622 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Nearly two thousand years ago, the Roman Empire conquered all territories west of the Persian Empire in modern day Iran and Iraq. The empire extended southwards into North Africa, and as far north as the British Isles. For close on to four centuries, the Romans controlled and conquered most of Western Eurasia and the Mediterranean. However, their rule came to an end because of the centrifugal forces of political and economic issues, foreign invaders and belligerent tribes, and socio-religious transformations. This brief response will help highlight the primary reasons why the Roman Empire fell.…

    • 622 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Second Punic War was a major turning point for Rome and its continued overseas expansion. The Romans drove the Carthaginians out of Spain, and then attacked Carthage itself. The Romans, led by Scipio Africanus, defeated the Carthaginians,…

    • 311 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    When we analyze the United States’s similarities and differences with Rome, there’s always an obvious juxtaposition that’s unmistakable. The similarities between these two great societies are considered and analyzed from many aspects like politic, military and culture. The political aspect of the United States and the ancient Rome has its root in the concept of republic. Militarily, both the U.S and ancient Rome are considered superpowers of their time. And from the cultural aspect, there’re a lot of comparisions made between these two societies. Here I will discuss more about these.…

    • 461 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Punic Wars

    • 592 Words
    • 3 Pages

    continually beat Carthage for the most part, besides a major loss in the battle of Tunis,…

    • 592 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The 3rd Punic War

    • 1504 Words
    • 7 Pages

    A big turning point was the 3rd Punic War and the End of Carthage. In 509 BC Carthage and Rome signed a friendship treaty. But this friendship would not last forever. There was series of wars fought between Carthage and Rome known as the Punic Wars. Fought between 264-146 BC. Carthage was a city-state on the Greek model that had been founded by Phoenicians. It was the strongest city in the Western Mediterranean by the 3rd century and it became very wealth through trade. Carthaginian merchants went from one end of the Mediterranean to the other, the city's fleets were huge, and its army was one of the best in the ancient world. It was Carthage that pried loose the Greek hold on the western ports, and Carthaginian merchants traded as far north as England and down the West African coast. Unlike Rome, but like the Greeks, the Carthaginians also made extensive use of mercenaries. By the early 200s, Carthage had expanded across North Africa but also had control of the Belearic Islands, Sardinia, Corsica, and much of Sicily. She took the goods from these regions, and her own fertile hinterland, and shipped them to eastern ports. Once Rome had conquered most of Italy, it was only a matter of time before these two ambitious and powerful empires came face to face with one another. Rome was a civilization that grew out of a small agricultural community founded on the Italian Peninsula. As years past Rome began to expand its empire all through out the peninsula. Later on they conquer most of the Italian peninsula. The Romans were very skilled fighters. Their army was fierce. They were stronger on land than on water. They wanted to expand their empire…

    • 1504 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Carthaginian campaign in Italy, led by Hannibal Barca, was immensely destructive and costly for Rome. It is interesting to note, however, that Hannibal never led a direct campaign against the City of Rome—a detail that has been both praised and criticized. One would naturally then ask, why did Hannibal never lead such a campaign? An investigation of Hannibal’s strengths…

    • 1644 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Then for some years Carthage was the most successful who was commanded by Hamilcar. However, at the battle at the Aegates Islands in 241, the Carthaginians were beaten so badly that they requested peace. This agreement involved leaving Sicily and paying a huge tax. Rome now had complete control of Sicily.…

    • 1243 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Carthage originally was a colony of Tyre. It was the first foreign power with whom the Rome encountered which was outside of the Italy. There were some of the similarities in the government of the Rome and the Carthage. For example, there were two chief magistrates (suffetes), similar to the Roman consuls. Moreover, the Carthage had the council of elders which is known as the "hundred" like as the Senate of the Romans. Additionally, the Carthage also had the assembly which is similar to the Comitia of Rome. Even though we can figure out the outward similarities between the Rome and the Carthage but they were very much different in their spirit.…

    • 619 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    There is much controversy when determining whether Roman rule benefited the entire empire, or just the city of Rome and Italy. There are more facts that point toward Roman rule benefiting the whole empire, not just Rome and Italy. The roads built throughout the empire were an advantage to everyone, the education system was fair to Roman children, and trading was active all over the Roman Empire.…

    • 1052 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Ancient Rome is recognized as being the forefront of technological innovations and efficiency improvement. The Pont du Gard aqueduct is no less than an impressive engineering feat, stretching for miles to deliver water to town centers. Roman architectural features, such as arches and domes, still remain a prominent presence in modern architecture, proving just how timeless, and more importantly, functional these inventions are. However, one notable difference between the two societies is that unlike Ancient Rome's approach to technological adoption through the appropriation of foreign territories, the United States gained its technological edge through development and research. From the invention of electricity and automobiles to computers,…

    • 573 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Both Carthage and Rome are both strong in military even though there are differences, similarities between the structure of government of Carthage and Rome cannot be over emphasized. This writing is focused on differences on differences between the two governments.…

    • 171 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays