Many people believe that all of Greece was united and had one large spectacular army but that’s not true. Greece and Rome both had armies of there own but the only Polis that used professional soldiers was Sparta. One of the reasons Rome was so powerful was because of their enormous terrifying army. There army was incredibly large and wore “cleats” for better traction but these cleats also made marching through cities loud and terrifying. Another difference could be something like where Athens built their power by sea trade and Rome built theirs by conquest(Gutman, 2012). The Athenians believe in wisdom and intelligence before war and anger so they would gain their power with trade instead of battle. In Rome if you were in the army that was your job where in most Greece city-states except Sparta the army consists of farmers, blacksmiths, and jobs like that. Most believe that during these times of war they weren 't thought out well and weren 't planned kind of like how you see in movies but this isn’t true. …show more content…
Like Rome and Greece both had their own armies but the only Polis that had there own professional army was Sparta, another example is how the Romans were banned together not just with the societies they conquered but with each other as well, Rome and Greece also had different types of government. These are only three out of many examples of things that are different between these two very similar