Top-Rated Free Essay
Preview

Rome: from Republic to Empire

Powerful Essays
1369 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Rome: from Republic to Empire
“From Republic to Empire”

Anthony Kalandjian
History I, Traviolia
Mon-Wed 8:00-9:25
October 29, 2012

The corruption of Rome became the start of a new Empire that conquered most of the known world at the time of its existence. In 5th century B.C.E., Rome was a new nation with a set of morals unlike any other culture. Their morals defined their Republic but as time passed these set of morals was lost and so was their form of government. Through corruption and power hungry rulers began the transformation of Rome from a Republic to an Empire.
This thirst for Power started after the Punic Wars between Rome and Carthage. Around this time Rome had some paranoia of foreign invasion after their experience with the Gauls in 387 B.C.E. The dispute between the two nations arose over the island of Sicily where Carthage was trying to protect its trade settlements and Rome attempting to stop Carthage from getting too close to their territory. After the defeat of Carthage in the Punic Wars, Rome plundered the rich nation and made them pay war taxes in order to compensate for all of Rome’s losses. The Romans also sought after Macedonia for allying with Carthage during the wars and out of revenge defeated the Macedonian king’s army and took the nation and converted them and Greece into provinces. These conquering of nations made Rome grow a craving for power especially after enjoying sweet victory and the riches gained from sacking towns.
Corruption grew within the political practices of Rome’s senate starting with the event that took place involving the Gracchi Brothers, Tiberius and Gaius Gracchus. Tiberius became elected as a Tribune in 133 B.C.E. and spent most of his time trying to push forward land reforms to pass that allowed the Plebian class to regain their land back from the Patricians. During the Punic Wars many Plebian farmers lost their land because they were away for too long in battle. Usually they left a hired hand or their wife to tend the farms, but when their spouse was unable to perform both the tasks in the household and on the field or the hired hand were to pass away while the man of the house was still away in battle then the land would most likely be lost. The spouse would be forced to sell the farm in order to provide for her family and the people that bought the land from them would be a Patrician since they were the only ones who had the money and because most of the Plebian class would be away fighting in war. A Patrician would buy a bunch of neighboring farms and he would combine them creating a giant estate for himself. Many people thought this to be unfair especially since it left a lot of Plebians homeless and the number of refugees in Rome grew rapidly; these were the people that Tiberius was fighting for. Tiberius constantly defied the senate by having the Plebian Assembly to pass laws and started his reform on his own by redistributing public land back to homeless Romans. He then broke the rules again by running for tribune again for the second year in a row which was illegal since each Tribune was allowed to run in office for only one year. That was the last straw for the senate, so they all banded together, went over to Tiberius and clubbed him to death. Even after his brother’s death Gaius ran for Tribune having the same goals as Tiberius and became elected in 123 B.C.E. Gaius also annoyed the senate just like his brother by pushing land reforms and public projects to help employ the poor. He also proposed revolutionary ideas like allowing citizenship to many Italians and creating a court system that put the consul members, who were accused of being corrupt, on trial. This enraged the senate and they chose to retaliate by gathering up to go murder Gaius. These series of events introduced a very corrupt and disorderly form of politics where a politician would kill another in order to gain in office or to stop another from gaining.
The rise of client armies came with more power hungry rulers that used their abilities and resources to gain more prestige and get ahead in politics. It first started with Gaius Marius who had a great military record as a junior officer and was the first person in his family to become a consul. Breaking the tradition of the consuls, Marius was elected six times by the people and had much popularity from the commoners. He gained much of his success by allowing the poor proletarian class into the army and giving them a chance to start a new life by allowing them the opportunity to acquire income through plundering towns they have conquered. Marius would purchase the armor and weaponry for his soldiers and all they had to do was win so Marius would get his money back by sacking the town. This started client armies when the soldiers were more devoted to serving their commander rather than to the republic because it was their commander who led them to victory and then generously split the treasures with them. These client armies were not necessarily a threat until Commander Lucius Cornelius Sulla used it for his own personal gain. He had gained a lot of success after the Social War which got him elected as consul in 88 B.C.E. but he achieved most of his power after the events in Asia Minor. People of Asia Minor despised Rome’s tax collectors who tried making people pay more than they needed to so the people revolted killing tens of thousands of Italians. The senate needed to send in troops to stop this treachery and in the meantime, the commander in charge of this expedition would be allowed access to all the riches and resources in Asia Minor so Sulla really wanted the job. He was furious to find out that his nemesis, Marius, had got it instead so he set his client army to go against Rome itself. He took control of Rome letting his soldiers riot through the city and then left to go get control of Asia Minor and plunder it. He came back triumphant and then civil war started in Rome for two years until Sulla defeated all who opposed him. He would exterminate all who went against his ruling, creating a process called a proscription where a list of peoples’ names would be written that were accused of being traitors and anyone would be able to hunt them down and kill them. This might have been appealing to some because the one who took this bounty would be able to acquire all the possessions to the people they assassinate. Sulla had also outlawed the Tribunes and only favored the optimates. He had created much disorder and chaos giving himself the name of dictator, but he exposed the fact that Rome did not fight to defend anymore but instead to plunder and create more land to control. Rome was getting close to fully becoming an empire.
After the First Triumvirate crumbled Julius Caesar was denied consul even after his numerous victories and all the prestige he had gained with the people of Rome. Instead Pompey was chosen to be sole consul and Caesar was ordered to surrender his command. Civil war broke out when Caesar led his army against Rome and attempted to take control of Rome. Pompey and most senators fled to Greece fearing Caesar’s army but Caesar still followed them there and defeated them ending the civil war. He chose to be the sole ruler of Rome claiming he would be a dictator with no term limit controlling the whole nation. Even after his assassination by the senate there was a long chain of sole rulers that continued after Caesar’s reign. Taking in account all the corruption and battles over power, Caesar started the Roman Empire by acting as if a king and being the only one to do so and having it be continued for many generations.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    In 500 years of no nation has everything stayed the same and Rome is no exception. While the economics of Rome managed to stay the same between 100 and 600 CE, and the laws of Rome with it, government and religion in 600 CE would not be recognizable to leaders and civilians from 100 CE.…

    • 689 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Discuss the political and economic changes and continuities that occurred as Rome went from a Republic to an Empire…

    • 362 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    big bang theory vs relgion

    • 4383 Words
    • 18 Pages

    To clarify what's out there to be investigated, Southall begins the handbook in earnest by defining the terms, since ghosts, spirits and poltergeists are not interchangeable and represent quite different phenomena.Ghosts and apparitions are a kind a recording on the environment - a residual energy that can come from a person, animal or even an inanimate object. We can experience these lingering energies by sight, sound, smell and touch. Spirits are what people most often think of as "ghosts." A spirit is the "actual sentient presence, or soul, of an individual or individuals who have remained in the material world after his or her physical body has died." Southall continues by describing different types of spirits and the reasons they may have stayed behind.…

    • 4383 Words
    • 18 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Fall Of Rome Dbq Essay

    • 643 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The Roman empire, what is now modern day Italy, was one of the largest and most powerful empires of the ancient world. Their accomplishments shaped politics, religion, and culture around the world. However, when the empire started to decline, Diocletian split the empire into western Rome and eastern Rome in 200 A.D.. While eastern Rome continued to thrive, western Rome collapsed in 400 A.D.. There were many reasons to why western Rome collapsed including military, economy, and religion. First, there were loyalty problems in the military. The economy was also down because of labor shortages. Finally, a new religion was spreading, which changed the morals of Rome.…

    • 643 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Han and Roman Empires are highly praised with great wealth, inventions, and their success.While both societies saw new technological advancements as necessary, the Han dynasty always sought the most efficient route, the romans prioritized speed and was not very fond of craftsmanship.…

    • 440 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    By 200 BC, Rome was quickly becoming one of the world’s greatest empires with their excellent military conquering territory from modern day Scotland to Spain. After the Punic Wars and the defeat of Carthage, Rome had full control of the Mediterranean region, establishing colonies in North Africa, Egypt, the Middle East, and Asia Minor. Julius Caesar became Rome’s first emperor using his military influence. Under his reign, Rome shifted from a republic to an empire under the rule of an emperor and the military. Rome steadily increased in stability, power, and wealth, reaching Pax Romana (the time of Roman peace) under Emperor Augustus Caesar. Rome was forced to discover, as many other large empires throughout history have, that size can create complications. Political strains developed and Rome eventually morphed into a government similar to a dictatorship. Believing their goal of a “perfect empire” had been reached, leaders in Rome began to become lazy. Romans developed a thirst for luxury and a lack of work ethic, which resulted in a decline in the quality of products made by the empire. Around the 5th century BC, Rome began to have constant invasion attempts by Germanic tribes at their borders. There was a multitude of factors contributing to the fall of Rome, the most impactful being the frequently changing leadership, the increasing negligence of the Roman army, and foreign invasions along Rome’s borders.…

    • 1013 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The Fall of the Roman Republic Lynn Hunt’s analysis of the Roman Republic is far more compelling than Polybius’s. Although Polybius writes concisely about the individual institutions within the Roman Republic and how they overlap, he superimposes his mixed constitution bias as his analysis seems more focused on the theoretical outline available in the constitution. On the other hand, Hunt is not so strictly tied to the constitutional ideas of the institutions and explores how in practice they have evolved and deviated from the attributes and responsibilities originally constructed in the Roman constitution.…

    • 2103 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Roman Empire Dbq Essay

    • 622 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In the later part of the Roman Empire’s existence, their political and government was fraught with political corruption and incompetent leaders. The…

    • 622 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    For one, as reported by Priscus, a Roman ambassador(449 CE), who was interviewing a former citizen of Rome: “the condition of Roman subjects during a time of peace [was] worse than war.”(Doc. E) The Roman people were in bad shape because of an unfair law, “taxes [were] very severe, and unprincipled men inflict[ed] injuries on others.”(Doc. E) The dire situation convinced the Roman citizens more and more that they should protest. And when the people did fight back, internal problems surfaced in Rome. However, not only were there harsh taxes causing turmoil, the Roman government was corrupt as well. “The climax of misery is to have to pay in order to obtain justice.”(Doc. E) The rich were bribing the lawmakers so they could get out of facing the law, and the poor didn’t have enough money to get out of punishment as well! Therefore, a great hatred between the rich and the poor was established. Rome may have been able to withstand battles on the outside, but if faced harsh battles within. The patricians believed that they could get away with whatever they wanted to, all they had to do was pay. Murder, theft, abuse and bribery were now tolerated in a place that would not have allowed them to be before. To sum up, Rome’s destruction was induced by legal injustice inside the…

    • 1163 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The traditional dates for the Roman Republic are 509 to 27 B.C. The latter part of this period from 133 to 27 B.C. is known as the late Republic. It is also known as the Roman Revolution. The result of this revolution was the emergence of the Roman Empire and the catalyst has traditionally been linked to a single Roman citizen called Tiberius Gracchus. The wake of his brief political career left Rome much different than it had been. Like a crack in the wall of a dam, Tiberius revealed a weakness in the Roman system of government that would soon spider out of control until it could no longer hold back the deluge of the building political tension. What was this weakness?…

    • 2567 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Best Essays

    Roman Government

    • 2157 Words
    • 9 Pages

    What Influence did Gaius Julius Caesar and Augustus have on the reforms of the government from a Republic to an Empire?…

    • 2157 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    tried to build a more solid senate but failed to take power away from the…

    • 2425 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the late 6th century BCE, the small city-state of Rome overthrew the shackles of monarchy and created a republican government (Donald L, 2016). In theory, if not always in practice, represents the wishes of its citizens. The establishment of the Roman Republic in 509 BCE was a result of several key circumstances: 1. Monarchical Abuse and Tyranny: The last Roman king, Lucius Tarquinius Superbus (Tarquin the Proud), was known for his oppressive rule and the abuse of power (Donald L, 2016).…

    • 726 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Roman Republic was rather democratic.The Romans were the start of a democracy, and we include many of their ideas today in the United States. They were democratic because they had a constitution two important elements including legislation, and the right for citizens to vote. The Romans still use the same concept as the government does nowadays, such as the magistrates, senate, and assemblies. The assemblies job was to pass legislation, which is the most important reason that Romans were democratic.…

    • 165 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Roman Government

    • 1305 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Although the form of government in the Roman Empire changed several times over its thousand year history, many parts remained the same and it has served as a model, inspiring the founding fathers as they created the governmental system of the United States of America almost 2,000 years later. Scattered around seven hills in the middle of the Italian peninsula, Rome began as a simple village of wooden huts. As it grew, it became governed by a monarchy, with a king having complete control. This lasted for over 200 years until the king was overthrown and a republic form of government was developed. Although controlled to a large extent by wealthy land owners and nobles, the general population was given an increasingly larger part in how the empire was run. This form of government worked well and the Roman Empire prospered. However, social unrest in the first century A.D., coupled with several military defeats, ended with Julius Caesar taking control and declaring himself dictator for life, ending the true republic form of government. Assassinated a month later, Rome then entered a period of rule by an emperor, which lasted until the fall of the Roman Empire in 476 A.D. The Roman Empire lasted longer than any other government in the western world and it has provided the foundation upon which the government of the United States is based, along with providing valuable lessons for future generations.…

    • 1305 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays