"Shakespeare's 'Romeo and Juliet' is a classic piece of literature with timeless themes. Compare and contrast the way Zeffirelli and Luhrmann have translated the play to the screen, particularly discussing the different elements of film used (such as setting and design, characters music and sound, cinematography)."
Romeo and Juliet Comparison Essay
Franco Zeffirelli and Baz Luhrmann both created very different films that were based around William Shakespeare's play "Romeo and Juliet", both of them had distinctly different aspects yet both still managed to convey the story that Shakespeare intended to show to his audience. However many differences still separated both films far apart from each other, including the costumes, settings and the actual time era both films were set in. One of the most prominent differences you'll notice are the titles of both films are different. Zeffirelli's was called "Romeo and Juliet" and was released in 1968, it featured old cobblestone buildings and wooden classic style wooden structures while Luhrmann's boasted massive skyscrapers, expansive mansions and was released under the name "Romeo + …show more content…
It is more compelling, more raw, and at the same time it still manages to convey the same story. One of the most outstanding effects for the two films is the use of music. The Luhrmann film has the same song that serves as background music for most of the encounters between Romeo and Juliet, an orchestral piece that is modern yet still gives the scenes it is used in a kind of classic vibe. The music sets this film apart in a very positive way from the other film. Though it is less traditional, it holds the appeal of being romantic because it is more appealing to the audiences of