Romeo Is To Blame For The Tragedy

WHO IS TO BLAME FOR THE TRAGEDY? Juliet cries and wails in despair when she sees the love of her life dead on the floor. Juliet’s blood runs cold with sadness and she soon becomes to quake in agony. A life without Romeo isn’t worth it, she thinks. Soon after, with a blade, she seals her fate as Romeo did. In William Shakespeare’s Romeo and Juliet, this tragedy was the greatest of them all. Two star-crossed lovers took their lives to avoid living without each other. If it were not for Romeo being impulsive with love, him slaying Tybalt, and him drinking the poison, both Juliet and he wouldn’t have died so tragically. Romeo is to blame for his own death and Juliet’s death as well. Henceforth, Romeo is to blame for the famous tragedy. First
Romeo slays Tybalt, after he is enraged about Tybalt killing Mercutio. “Either thou or I, or both, must go with him…This shall determine that [They fight], [Tybalt falls],” (Shakespeare, 123-124). The after effect of him murdering Tybalt is he ends up getting banished from Verona. Distance from Juliet will prove to be great, when Friar Lawrence needs to send a letter to him. “For I excile hath more terror in his look, much more than death. Do not say “banishment,” Romeo exclaims (Shakespeare, 141). Romeo always runs head first at his problems without thinking about the consequences. If Romeo didn’t get himself banished, then Romeo and Juliet could have still continued with their secret relationship. Lord Capulet wouldn’t have seen Juliet sorrowful and proposed the conception of marriage with Paris and Juliet. Juliet then wouldn’t have needed a plan to escape the marriage with Paris because it would have never even happened in the first place! As soon as Romeo’s frenzied sword burrows into Tybalt’s chest, he sealed his and Juliet’s fate. Even though Romeo massacres Tybalt, that wasn’t even all of why he was to blame for the extraordinary