That these creatures can be a sort of entertainment for the generations to come. It it very contradicting to his previous statements of wanting to de-extinct these animals just because it is the right thing to do. Doing so further lowers not only his credentials and how the readers feel about him, but on whether or not humans should be involved with anything genetic if it just leads to “pure thrill” and…
In this chapter titled "Wilderness," the author is discussing how man has tampered with what was originally created by Mr. Almighty, named wilderness. He is also discussing issues surrounding the preservation, adversaries, exhaustion, and the breaking down of wilderness for the transportation and industrialization of today's society. The author mentioned how some certain values of wilderness should be preserved that can be lost and never found. The author argues, some parts of wilderness many of us will be able to view, but things like prairie flowers by the thousands, virgin pineries of the Lake States, and huge hardwoods shall never be seen again. Mr. Leopold speaks about the shrinking coastlines,…
Never has a man left the embrace of nature once he found himself enamored by it; this infatuation is found in both John Muir’s and Aldo Leopold’s writing, a sense of wanting to protect this deity they call Mother Nature, a moral and ethical responsibility which every human being has to this Mother. Both John Muir and Aldo Leopold recount their almost romantic encounter with Mother Nature in their books Our National Parks and A Sand County Almanac, respectively. However, in both books it is notable that each man carries instilled in the very fiber of their being a sense of dissatisfaction toward the process of mechanization and industrialization; processes which unfortunately…
A) Good Oak: While sawing through the bark of a dead tree, Leopold summarizes historical events that corresponded to each concentric ring he encountered. While the tree remained resistant to change, society slowly progressed from viewing nature solely for commercial value to overcoming past ideologies and beginning to respect and feel compelled to defend nature. Bur Oak: Leopold depicts key players and consequences in the ‘prairie war’ to illustrate how every player, even fire, has a role in maintaining an ecosystem. Sky Dance: Leopold beautifully describes the mating ritual of the male woodcock on his property that occurs annually in April.…
"Conservation is getting nowhere because it is incompatible with our Abrahamic concept of land. We abuse land because we regard it as a commodity belonging to us. When we see land as a community to which we belong, we may begin to use it with love and respect."…
In selections into the wild by Krakauer he describes what is known to happen to Chris McCandless on hit trip to Alaska. Chris’s goal was to live for a period of time disconnected from everything. He never made it back and people were very critical about his trip. Chris journalized his trip and a year later Krakauer later traveled to where he died. Krakauer and his team discussed McCandless’s challenges. Krakauer went to Alaska to visit the bus, his team was critical of McCandless, and I agreed with them for the most part.…
He argues the theory of the mass extinction happening because of the last Ice Age. “The Americas’ big mammals had already survived the ends of 22 previous Ice Ages. Why did most of them pick the 23rd to expire in concert, in the presence of all those supposedly harmless humans?” (Page 47)…
The land ethic In Leopold’s view, humans see themselves as conquerors of the environment, and this is the key fault we all begin with in achieving this symbiosis with nature. This can be referred to as the conqueror role- we think we know what makes a community “tick.” We think we can manage it, and be “kings” of the land. But we don’t know as much as we think we do. He persists there is an instrumental value to nature, and this is one of the reasons we have no choice but to preserve it, we cannot survive as a species without its resources.…
In this chapter “On the Rainy River”, O’Brien was really difficult time to decided whether he go into war nor he will flee to Canada. This quotation is said where O’Brien decided to enter the war even he hated war a lot. He is afraid that his family, community, and others will be ashamed of him. He thinks of the pride he will lose if he flees to Canada. So this is the start of this book because the whole book depends on the war experience of O’Brien if he wasn’t decided to go war there will not be a book called “ The Thing They Carried”.…
In addition, “the great auks of Funk Island were exploited in every way that humans ingenuity could devise,” partly because they had “very good and nourishing meat.” The main message that Kolbert was trying to present to her audience was that that the the great auk was a great example of how human exploitation of natural resources is a branch of extinction. I thought the idea of human exploitation was very important because it is a very important issue. We, as humans, have been exploiting natural resources since the industrial revolution in the 19th century. This constant need for resources and our careless and excessive consumption of these resources has lead to many negative consequences. Some of these consequences include: deforestation, extinction of species, oil depletion, ozone depletion, greenhouse gas increase, water pollution, etc. Nature and the resources it produces are universal. So, if you are negatively impacting it, then it is hurting everyone. This idea is so important because our careless exploitation of these resources will seriously hurt the future world, not only damaging the economy but damaging mother nature. This will impact me in many…
Farmers cut forests to provide more room for planting crops or grazing livestock. Often many small farmers will each clear a few acres to feed their families by cutting down trees and burning them (National Geographic 2). Thoreau had his own place to plant also, but Thoreau chose a place free from trees and cared for nature. He made a good point on caring for nature and protecting the land, he advanced to us what was going to happen if we did not care for the environment and his predictions were correct all that he said is now happening with our environment and…
Introduction: In Mark Twain’s essay “Two Views of the River,” the implied thesis is losing innocence and gaining experience. This idea is effectively communicated to his audience through appropriate organization of ideas, opposing tone, and stylistic devices. Twain’s essay uses the block structure for contrast, differing styles, and opposing tones.…
Most of Leopold’s arguments were in my opinion good arguments. In the third part, Leopold brings to my attention the obvious ironies of conservation. To promote the appreciation of wildlife and gain political support, one encourages recreational usage of wilderness. That same recreational use destroys the very environment that you would be trying to conserve. Leopold talks about how people want to take a trophy from the wilderness to share or always remember their experience. He says that just being there is a trophy enough. I love to hunt and I love to widdle wood. In Leopold’s eyes I would be taking trophies. He goes into such detail describing small creatures; that I usually would shoot for fun, but he really opened my eyes to how just the slightest change can affect so much in an ecosystem that I think twice.…
‘is it impossible for humans to use the rainforest as a resource without destroying it?’…
The primary claim that Nash is trying to give across is that change is necessary in order to preserve wilderness because “It will either be consciously and deliberately preserved by policy and law or it will vanish.” (75) Nash makes the assumption that as of now, with no direct action being taken, wilderness is disappearing. Nash suggests our current generations, as he redefines as the new frontiersmen, need to take immediate action regarding the preservation of wilderness. He uses the antithesis strategy with the reader and the audience, displaying to them that they must preserve wilderness or it will be gone. Nash builds pathos describing the current technique of emotional defending a start, but not enough to yield results. He goes on to analyze that different parks, animals, and well-known areas of wilderness are being defended and supported without actual reasoning. This strikes some logical thought in the reader and the audience, forcing them to acknowledge they eye opening question Nash possesses, “Why save a place like the Grand Canyon, why keep it wild?” (76)…