Preview

Rousseau's Discourse On The Origin Of Inequality

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
2343 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Rousseau's Discourse On The Origin Of Inequality
In Rousseau’s Discourse on the Origin of Inequality Rousseau critiques Hobbes’ natural man in Leviathan. Rousseau states that Hobbes does not go far back enough to fully talk about a man in the state of nature. Rousseau disagrees with Hobbes’ definition of a natural man, saying Hobbes took a man, who has already been shaped by society and put him into a state of nature, and Hobbes fails to understand the effect of pity and that government only increases the problems of man. Suzanne Collin’s Hunger Games series appears to agree with Hobbes’ definition of the state of nature but in the end follows the evaluation Rousseau has of Hobbes.
In Hobbes’ Leviathan, Hobbes states that the right of nature “is the liberty each man hath to use his own power
…show more content…

At the beginning everyone is equal distance from the Cornucopia where all the supplies and weapons are, and “From this equality of ability ariseth equality of hope in the attaining of our ends”(I.XIII.3). Although Haymitch had told both Katniss and Peeta to “get the hell out of there”(HG138) when the gong sounds, Katniss is not so sure if that is the best option for her(HG149).She knows that she could protect herself with the bow and arrow she saw in the Cornucopia but cannot decide if it is worth it to go in (HG149).Katniss knows that she would not be able to win hand to hand combat so for her running towards the Cornucopia to grab the backpack to at least have something to help her through the Games, but not go all the way to the Cornucopia was the right move. While others, did run in the complete opposite direction of the Cornucopia, because they knew that decision was best for them (HG151). In the arena all the tributes are dressed the same in “simple tawny pants, light green blouse, sturdy brown belt, and thin hooded black jacket” (HG 145), the tributes are not allowed to bring anything with them into the arena besides a token from their district. This keeps them equal and keeps them enemies because then everyone in the arena is fighting for the items in the …show more content…

This man “speak[s] continually of need, avarice, oppression, desires, and pride” ideas Rousseau argues “they acquire in society” (Rousseau 17). Because that man is not a savage, “Hobbes failed to notice… [man’s] innate repugnance to seeing his fellow man suffer,” a concept Rousseau refers to as pity (Rousseau 36). It is this natural pity that keeps people from hurting others for no reason. And since Hobbes does not see natural pity he does not understand that “as long as he does not resist the inner impulse of compassion, he will never harm another man … except … if his preservation were involved, he is obliged to give preference to himself” (Rousseau 14). But with natural pity the amount of vanity has for one’s self is lessened for “pity is what, in the state of nature, takes place of laws, mores, and virtue, with the advantage that no one is tempted to disobey its sweet voice” (Rousseau 38). Unfortunately, as savages learned to communicate with others and began to join and live with and see others everyday, “each one began to look at the others and to want to be looked at himself, and public esteem had a value” and once “the idea of esteem was formed in their minds, each one claimed to have a right to it and was no longer possible for anyone to be lacking it with impunity” (Rousseau 49). “Hence each man punished the contempt

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Rousseau depicts man in his natural state as innocent and good, blaming the invention of property as the root of societal inequalities and lamenting the sacrifice of liberty required of members of a state. Rousseau's early man is deemed non-confrontational, concerned only with 'self-preservation'…

    • 252 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Jean-Jacques Rousseau, who lived from 1712 to 1778, was a man of many things. Rousseau was a composer, philosopher, and a writer in the 18th century. His political philosophy influenced the Enlightenment in France and across Europe, as well as aspects of the French Revolution and the overall development of modern political thought. Rousseau's also had ideas about education.…

    • 192 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Rousseau Vs Hobbes

    • 209 Words
    • 1 Page

    In favor of Hobbes, he does make several valid points. His theory in regards to constant competition applies to this day, as people constantly find themselves in situations where they meet others that are of equal physical strengths and could be faced with a conflict as a result. Despite the points that Hobbes makes, his theory is overall negative, as living in a constant state of fear and paranoia is absolutely no way to live one’s life. Rousseau is very pertinent to remind others of how life was before society and technology took over. Life was extremely simple, and everyone was fairly alright with living alone and focusing on themselves and their life. If today’s society was the same as it was over a thousand years ago, almost no one would…

    • 209 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Thomas Hobbes' Remedy for

    • 680 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Thomas Hobbes begins Leviathan with Book 1: Of Man, in which he builds, layer by layer, a foundation for his eventual argument that the "natural condition" of man, or one without sovereign control, is one of continuous war, violence, death, and fear.…

    • 680 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    According to Rousseau, there are some good things in civilization but there are negatives that come with it. This correlates to his famed quote “A man is born free, and everywhere he is in chains”. This can be interpreted as people are born free, but they are chained by the societies that they live in. People believe they live above society’s standards but it is society themselves who reminds people that you always seek approval from them and always conform to their beliefs, therefore it makes us a slave to societies standards. Even the people who enforce society’s standards and think they are the perfect example for society also show that they are a bigger slave than to those who are trying to seek the approval of society. Rousseau's main argument is that the main cause for all of human nature's problem is not 'sin' but separation from 'Nature.' He believed that Nature has always been kind to man and only when he separates himself from Nature that he degenerates both physically and morally. This is in direct contrast to Hobbes' views that man is fundamentally…

    • 1774 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    At first sight, Locke’s The Second Treatise of Government, seemed quite similar to Hobbes’s Leviathan. They both believed that a state of nature is a state that exist without government. They believe that men are created equal in this state, however Hobbes argues that because of self-preservation, man possessed the desire to control over other man. Locke, on the other hand, reasons with a more peaceful and pleasant place.…

    • 789 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    That men are sinister in the State of Nature could be promoted as a headline to Hobbes’s magnum opus, Leviathan. In the state of nature, men are not magnanimous beings. A notion similar to the first sin, yet different from a philosopher like Jean Jacque Rousseau. It has always been taken for granted that there are wicked and virtuous humans, yet for Hobbes, humans are innately wicked. These notions, however abstract and contradictory they may seem, are demonstrated in this short paper; Hobbes’s chapter 13 of Leviathan is abridged in this paper. First, the inclinations that drive men to behave in a wicked way are outlined step by step. Then Hobbes’s reason for having a common power is established. Generally, this paper is a reflection on Chapter 13 of Leviathan with explanation and commentary.…

    • 1395 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    First, Hobbes imagines the state of nature as what would result if humans were free from laws and societal expectations, a conception which has latent problems. Conceiving of the state of nature in this way predisposes Hobbes to imagine simply taking already-socialized human beings and freeing them of the constraints of civil society and the force of authority. In Discourse on the Origin of Inequality, Rousseau argues that Hobbes, and other political theorists, have not removed the effects of society from their conceptions of natural man. Rousseau writes that his objective involves “separating what he [man] derives from his own wherewithal from what circumstances and his progress have added to or changed in his primitive state”…

    • 1545 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    This phrase of Hobbes can be seen as a summary of all his views on man as a moral agent in building a peaceful society. In his definition of ‘deliberation’ as ‘the whole sum of desires, aversions, hopes and fears’, we can find two important features: (1) deliberation and reason are not equivalent, and (2) deliberation is not an exclusive faculty…

    • 1632 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the Discourse on the Origin of Inequality, Rousseau describes the state of nature and the origin of chance events that gave birth to a civil state, where men build social relationships and developed reason. His description of state of nature is very different from that of Locke and Hobbes, as he believes that state of nature is actually better than the civil society. According to Rousseau, civil state is the culprit behind destroying the rudimentary man. It is surprising to note that Rousseau prefers state of nature over civil state, where savage humans live amicably. Rousseau indirectly criticizes Hobbes’ way of examining original man’s traits that developed because of living in a society. Through his thought experiment, Rousseau tries…

    • 591 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    He published a work known as Leviathan, in which he argued that before organized society all humans practiced self-preservation. This basically meant every man for himself under certain conditions. This egotistical view came to terms in a life or death situation. Hobbes knew that even though many people seemed grateful and giving to others, that when it came down to it, man would simply do anything necessary to ensure his own survival. To assist this issue, Mr. Hobbes believed that people made a sort of social contract that eventually formed a state.…

    • 466 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The argument presented by Thomas Hobbes in chapter 13 of Leviathan, is that the state of nature is a state of war of all against all. Such a view had previously been discussed- earlier versions of the argument appear in other significant works- however it is Hobbes account of a state in “continuall feare of danger and violent death”1 upon which I will focus on and critique in this essay. There are many reasons why many seem to regard Hobbes argument as the most accurate portrayal of a pre-civilised society, many believe it to be so straightforward and seemingly correct that to object it would be to ignore a necessary truth. Secondly, those who accept Hobbes’ view of a human nature that is so egotistical and unforgiving, would seemingly too agree to the assumption of a gloomy, unbearable state of nature. In this essay I shall argue that such opinions are not logically justified as Hobbes’s argument holds its foundations solidly in assumption alone, an assumption that was heavily moulded on his surroundings of a savage Civil War. Hobbes’s argument lies solely on the grounds that human beings are intrinsically wicked and self-centred beings an argument that cannot be completely validated and therefore cannot be a ‘necessary truth’. Yet despite holding such a bleak outlook on the human condition and its simple invalidity the work of Thomas Hobbes still shapes the political word today2 and it continues to impact our understanding of human nature and interactions. In order to justify my critique of Hobbes I will begin by presenting both his original argument and a brief view of some modern interpretations before cross examining their conclusions against that of other social contract theorist such as Locke and Rousseau as well as rational logic to present the argument that the state of nature is most certainly not a state of war of all against all.…

    • 3361 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Imagine yourself living in world with no social expectations, no competitions and no submission to the social hierarchy. Imagine yourself being free, peaceful, strong and powerful. Jean-Jacques Rousseau calls this state the natural state of man, the state that everyone should aspire to live in and that brings power to an individual. By exploring the natural state of man we are able to see how Jean-Jacques Rousseau developed a new understanding of the individual.…

    • 3155 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The establishment of a civil society in a political contract also does not protect an individual from domination, but instead lead to social inequality. Locke claimed “The only way whereby anyone divests himself of his natural liberty, and put on the bonds of civil society, is by agreeing with other men to join and unite into a community, for their comfortable, safe, and peaceable living one amongst another, in a secure enjoyment of their properties, and a greater security against any, that are not of it” (Locke 52) Locke claimed a person can be protected from domination when they consensually give up their perfect freedom and the right to judge and execute the laws of nature in order to form a civil society. The loss of some of their rights will be compensated by the benefits…

    • 1191 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Thomas & Locke

    • 513 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The one great similarity between Thomas Hobbes’ state of nature and John Locke’s state of nature is that they both discuss how dangerous a state of nature can actually be. Both suggest that men are equals in this state with Hobbes stating “Nature hath made men so equal, in the faculties of body and mind, as that though there be found one man sometimes manifestly stronger in body, or of quicker mind than another; yet when all is reckoned together, the difference between man and man is not so considerable.” Likewise, Locke describes this nature as a “state of perfect equality, where naturally there is no superiority or jurisdiction of one over another.” Despite thinking alike in this way, however, Locke and Hobbes warn of the risk of the state of nature. Hobbes so states, “if any two men cannot enjoy the same thing, they become enemies and in the way to their end…endeavor to destroy or subdue one another.” Similarly, Locke points out these risks, saying that without the “law of nature,” man may make decisions that lead to a state of war.…

    • 513 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays