Preview

Rousseau's Presentation Of Human Nature

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
699 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Rousseau's Presentation Of Human Nature
Rousseau’s presentation of “human nature” is optimistic. According to Rousseau, “ If then the people promises simply to obey, by that very act it dissolves itself and loses what make it a people; then moment a master exits, there is no longer a Sovereign, and from that moment the body politic has ceased to exit” (22, The Social Contract), he sees people as intrinsically good when they get away from social setting and political experience. Oppositely, Machiavelli sees “human nature” as something conditional. He presents humans are evil whenever they need to achieve what they want, based on “... take for granted that all men are evil and that they will always express the wickedness of their spirit…” (118, The Portable Machiavelli). To me, I think …show more content…
Diaz del Castillo's version is what he has witnessed with Cortes during the conquest and he wants to fix the works of other historians such as Gomara about the Spanish conquest because they have no knowledge of the campaign. “ Gomara says that the soldiers wanted to mutiny and rebel,… I say never in the world was a captain obeyed with more respect and punctuality, as will be seen further on” (263, The True History of the Conquest of New Spain), this is an example that Diaz del Castillo says Gomara's works are not true according to his eye-witness. Therefore, Diaz del Castillo is closer to the truth than De Las Casas because his version of the Spanish conquest of the Americas is to fix all the mistakes of other historians’ …show more content…
Smith supports his thought by saying “ No regulation of commerce can increase the quantity of industry in any society beyond what its capital can maintain. It can only divert a part of it into a direction into which it might not otherwise have gone; and it is by no means certain that this artificial direction is likely to be more advantageous to the society than that into which it would have gone of its own accord” (113, The Great Political Theories). He does not want the government to interfere in commerce activities instead of leaving people to their own business. According to this quote “ Every individual is continually exerting himself to find out the most advantageous employment for whatever capital he can command. It is his own advantage, indeed, and not that of the society, which he has in view” (113, The Great Political Theories), it is advantageous for people to trade with others. People can make their best products and trade with others to get the products they are not good at. By this method, the economies are more efficient than using regulation of

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Unlike Thomas Hobbes, who believed humans were naturally evil, Jean Rousseau believed that humans are born, neither good nor bad, thus corruption or goodness is taught from the society. For example, when children are born, everything they…

    • 514 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Managerial Economics Quiz

    • 4814 Words
    • 20 Pages

    21. The theory of absolute advantage suggests that under free, unregulated trade, each nation should…

    • 4814 Words
    • 20 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Rousseau depicts man in his natural state as innocent and good, blaming the invention of property as the root of societal inequalities and lamenting the sacrifice of liberty required of members of a state. Rousseau's early man is deemed non-confrontational, concerned only with 'self-preservation'…

    • 252 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Bernal Diaz Del Castillo

    • 1248 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Before accepting Diaz’s text or any other primary document it is important to examine and understand the motivations of the author. Bernal Diaz’s motivations for writing are unusual for a few reasons. First of all, The True History of the Conquest of New Spain was written in response to Gómara’s Chronicles of the Conquest of New Spain. Gómara was Hernán Cortes’ personal secretary and scribe. He was commissioned by Cortes to write the history of the conquest. As a result, Gómara’s text had an obvious bias. In Chronicles of the Conquest of New Spain, Cortes was glorified and credited almost singularly with conquering the Aztecs. Being a lieutenant under Cortes, Bernal Diaz was angered by the complete lack of respect given to the other conquistadors and by the bias of Gómara’s text. He decided to write a history that would correct the numerous inaccuracies of Chronicles of the Conquest of New Spain. Of course, Diaz was no historian, nor was he an accomplished writer. He was merely a common soldier and had little formal education. Still, Bernal Diaz intended to write an accurate history of the conquest and many believe that is what he accomplished.…

    • 1248 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The understanding of human nature and the effects it has on the individual and society has been a serious topic in the philosophical world. Nicolo Machiavelli and Thomas Hobbes were well known for their crucial roles in forming the foundation of political philosophy. While reading through Machiavelli’s The Prince and Hobbes’ Leviathan, both introduced a common focus on political theory even though living approximately 100 years apart. While learning about these two philosophers and their proposed theories, I noticed an innate relationship in the discussion of society’s human nature. Machiavelli ([1532] 2006) in The Prince theorizes the qualities that a dominant leader should have to gain and maintain power.…

    • 292 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Adam Smith’s The Wealth of Nations is extremely similar in that it postulates that the market will run smoothly when men are left to their rational self to pursue their economic desires. The market only runs smoothly and wealth is only spread when the market is free of policies such as protectionist measures. The rational individual will understand that developing industry locally is more beneficial to himself and therefore the community in which he invests (The Wealth of Nations, 16). The government plays next to no role in the economy, the market regulated by the “invisible hand.” Thus protectionist measures and other forms of market interference began to be greatly looked down upon as inferences within the market, and interferences with…

    • 123 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    adam smith

    • 358 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Smiths baptism was on June 16, 1723 in Scotland. Smith attended the University of Glasgow at age 14, later on transferring to Balliol College in Oxford, England. He also spent time tutoring and teaching. Smith is culpable for promoting many of the ideas that built the school of thought that became known as Classical Economics. Laissez Faire philosophies like reducing the role of government intervention and taxation in the free markets and the idea that an invisible hand models supply and demand are key concepts Smiths writing is responsible for advocating. Adam Smith believed if the customer was satisfied and their needs were meet if would be good for both parties. This type of system would be beneficial for a country as a whole because the producer would continue to earn profits and the customers would keep coming back because they are satisfied. This is good for a country because it keeps it thriving.…

    • 358 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Human nature has been the discussion of many of philosophical works. There are some who believe human beings are inherently bad, individualistic and greedy. There are those who believe humans are inherently good and seek the best possible outcomes for society as a whole. Upon reading Niccolò Machiavelli’s The Prince, Karl Marx’s The Communist Manifesto, and John Locke’s Second Treatise of Government the audience may begin to understand how those ideas of human nature can have an effect on an individual’s political ideology. Machiavelli, Marx, and Locke all expressed in their works how they viewed human nature and gave historical background and evidence of how their opinions of human nature directly affected their political ideology and how…

    • 1869 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Machiavelli: a Cynic?

    • 660 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Many writings argue that human kind is born capable of evil things or that they are born either good or evil. Machiavelli argues simply that man is self-centered and only after self preservation. He argues that mankind is immoral and greedy. His opinions are apparent as he states, "It may be said of men in general that they are ungrateful, voluble, dissemblers, anxious to avoid danger, and covetous of gain," in the eighteenth paragraph of The Prince. These thoughts and views have gained him the title of a cynic. More than a cynic however, Machiavelli is but a realist.…

    • 660 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Throughout history authors have had opposing views towards human nature. Writers such as John Locke and Karl Marx believe that humans are naturally good and put their trust in human nature. However, writers such as Machiavelli oppose these views and does not put trust in human nature because he believes humans are naturally evil. Locke focuses his writings on human rights, Marx describes the influences of the economy, and Machiavelli details his beliefs of government. Their perceptions of human nature influence their writing and their view of government.…

    • 1623 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    3. What did Adam Smith believe serves to curb self-interest in an economy? “People care what others think of them and it is this desire for the good opinion of others that constrains people in their pursuit of self-interest” (41). Adam goes on to say, “this constraint is reinforced by competition and by the jurisprudence system” (41). Smith believes that others opinions shape what they pursue. Smith…

    • 449 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Adam Smith’s writing, Of the Principle of the Commercial or Mercantile System, from, “The Wealth of Nations”, showed that he was endeavoring to argue that the most efficient economy was an economy where there is less restrictions placed on businesses and their owners. He seemed to be fighting for constrained restrictions on the trade market, and less probability of having to answer to the government, or the government having the right to intervene in one’s business. He shows that the best way to accomplish this is to have equality in how one trades. To find the difference in the value of both the exports and imports trade market. Therefore, if it is found that the exports are higher than the imports than the owners/market knew they were…

    • 398 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Rousseau thought is people are essentially good that we as evident by our virtue of compassion we are outgoing sharing people rather than closed nomads like the men of Hobbes state Hobbes views man as greedy and ruthless in nature and it is not a “war of all against all”(Hobbes1651) as Hobbes believes.(Bluhm…

    • 1275 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    “Man is born free ,but everywhere he is in chains.”-Jean-Jacques Rousseau. A majority of us interpret this quote in a way that the society is believed as “inadequate.” Despite this relation to modern society we need to go in more depth to uncover that society is not the problem ,but the consequences within are. In addition to this philosopher of enlightenment has developed a variety of miraculous works such as the series of the 3 discourses, Emile(education based), and Julie. Not only have his works enlightened society as a whole ,but also the government,educational, and romantic aspects of it.…

    • 487 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    All about Rousseau

    • 603 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Rousseau’s view on human nature is quite interesting. As Rousseau discusses in one of his most famous work’s: The Social Contract, the state of nature is the hypothetical, prehistoric place and time where human beings live untouched by society. The most important characteristic of the state of nature is that people have full physical freedom and are at liberty to do as they wish. He believed that humans were essentially good when in their natural state before civilization, but thought humans were eventually corrupted by society. Unfortunately, the human nature also has a disadvantage that is that human beings have yet to discover rationality and morality. Also, Rousseau’s interpretation of the state of nature is entirely more positive than Hobbes’s thoughts on the same idea, who originated the term. He viewed the state of nature as almost a state of war and savagery. The two philosophers both had altering views of human nature, which Rousseau viewed as somewhat good and Hobbes saw as cruel and brutal. An important thing to add is that Rousseau recognized that even though we cannot ever return to the state of nature, understanding the concept will help society’s members be able to realize their natural goodness easier.…

    • 603 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays