Preview

Roy Olmstead's 4th Amendment Rights

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
160 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Roy Olmstead's 4th Amendment Rights
Roy Olmstead was accused of importing and possessing illegal liquors back in 1927. He was later proved guilty by wiretaps installed in his basement. Olmstead tried saying that his 4th and 5th amendment were violated, but in conclusion his 4th amendment rights were not infringed because mere wiretapping does not qualify under a search or seizure. To be searched means that they would physically have to be there searching for something without a warrant that is. They are allowed to do so with a warrant. The vote behind his rights were 5-4 not in his favor. So he was later detained and arrested by the police. In this court case the officials learned a lot about how they should think, they decided that they should not back down in that sort of situation
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Case Study: Chimel V. California
    • 211 Words
    • 1 Page

    Case Study: Chimel V. California

    Facts: This case raises questions concerning the Fourth Amendment and searches incident to a lawful arrest. On September 13th, 1965, three police officers arrived at Chimel’s residence in Santa Ana, California. They possessed a search warrant, which authorized Chimel’s…

    • 211 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Arizona Vs Johnson Case Summary
    • 4995 Words
    • 20 Pages

    Arizona Vs Johnson Case Summary

    In 2002, Lemon Montrea Johnson was the passenger in the backseat of a car stopped for a traffic violation. Johnson was charged with; inter alia, possession of drugs and possession of a weapon by a felon. These items were discovered during a protective pat-down search of Johnson. Johnson was convicted by the trial court. Johnson argued that his conviction should be overturned because the trial court was in error by denying his motion to suppress the evidence. He argued that he had been unlawfully “seized” because being a passenger in a vehicle does not automatically constitute “seizure.” He furthered argued that even if he had been “seized,” that by the time Officer Trevizo searched him he was no longer “seized” as their conversation had become consensual. Furthermore, the evidence should not be considered because the search violated his Fourth Amendment rights and because the…

    • 4995 Words
    • 20 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    The Three Levels Of The Dollree Mapp Case
    • 723 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The Three Levels Of The Dollree Mapp Case

    On May 23, 1957, police officers in a Cleveland, Ohio suburb received information that a suspect in a bombing case, as well as some illegal betting equipment, might be found in the home of Dollree Mapp,so the police went to her home and she refused their entrance without a warrant, several hours later the police arrive in numbers and force their way in, when asked about their warrant an officer flashed Mapp a piece paper then arrested her before she could read it. The police did. It find the terror suspect but did find a chest containing pornographic materials and pictures which are in violation of an Ohio law of possession of obscene materials, at the trial the warrant was never presented to Mapp or her lawyer and Mapp was found guilty upon charges. They then took the case to the Ohio Supreme Court and claimed the eve deuce was taken illegally and that illegal evidence shouldn't be able to be used in court, the verdict was that the officers took it from the trunk peacefully so it was legal, then Mapp took the case to the Supreme Court claiming that her rights granted to her by the 4th amendment had been violated.…

    • 723 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Dollree Mapp Case Study
    • 452 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Dollree Mapp Case Study

    When Mapp’s conviction was upheld in an Ohio court, Mapp took her case to the Supreme Court of the United States, who in essence had to decide if evidence brought forward to the court that was obtained in violation of the 4th amendment could be acceptable in state…

    • 452 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Virginia vs Moore
    • 470 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Virginia vs Moore

    An en banc decision reinstated Moore’s conviction. This group of judges held that although his arrest violated Virginia’s arrest statutes, exclusion of evidence was not the remedy because the Fourth Amendment’s requirement for probable cause was satisfied. Moore appealed to Virginia’s Supreme Court after this. The Supreme Court overturned the conviction on the grounds of the arrest was unlawful and there was no right to search Moore. There were several other cases that were used and helped Moore. Two of them that the court used were Knowles v. Iowa and United States…

    • 470 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Terry Vs. Ohio Case
    • 564 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Terry Vs. Ohio Case

    The most famous case in U.S. history is the Terry v. Ohio . The Terry v. Ohio case raised many questions as to whether or not the search and seizure of Terry violated the Fourth Amendment. The police officials thought they would take action upon themselves into frisking and searching the men for what they could find, not acknowledging the rights of the people. The courts decision was 8-1, meaning that the search done by the officer was reasonable in the Fourth Amendment and the weapons that were taken were used and held against him as evidence. After the Terry case, police are now demanded to search a suspect on reasonable suspicion.…

    • 564 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Thermal Imager Dbq Case Study
    • 753 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Thermal Imager Dbq Case Study

    In Document A, it contained precedent cases related towards DLK’s case. The first precedent case was Carroll v. United States (1925). Carroll had been suspected to have sold liquor and was caught driving on the highway. The federal agents pulled him over and saw that there was liquor in his car, so they arrested him. He had argued that they had needed a warrant in order to search his vehicle, but the Supreme Court said that it was valid. The reason why it was valid was because of the statement Chief Justice William Howard Taft said, which was, “.. the guaranty of…

    • 753 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Miranda Vs. Arizona Case Study
    • 507 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Miranda Vs. Arizona Case Study

    The second of the Supreme Court Cases to be discussed is Miranda V. Arizona. The importance of this case is that Miranda was interrogated without knowledge of his 5th amendment rights. In this specific case, the police arrested Miranda from his home in order to take him into investigation at the Phoenix police station. While Miranda was put on trial, he was not informed that he had a right to an attorney. From this the officers were able to retrieve a signed written statement from Miranda. Most importantly, this letter stated that Miranda had full knowledge of his legal rights. From the evidence found, Miranda was sentenced to prison for 20 to 30 years. From here the Supreme Court stated that, “...Miranda's constitutional rights were not violated in obtaining the confession…” (Miranda V Arizona).…

    • 507 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Mapp V. Ohio Case Study
    • 1111 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Mapp V. Ohio Case Study

    Mapp v. Ohio is an important case that made history. For the reason it has to do the Fourth and Fourteenth Amendment. All evidence obtained by searches and seizures in violation of the Federal Constitution is inadmissible in a criminal trial in a state court. Wolf v. Colorado, 338 U. S. 25, overruled insofar as it holds to the contrary. Pp. 367 U. S. 643-660.…

    • 1111 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Search and Seize Paper
    • 742 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Search and Seize Paper

    The most famous search and seizure is Mapp v. Ohio. This case happens back in 1961, March 29 and end on June 19, 1961. Which were an unreasonable searches and seizures what relates on the fourth Amendment. When the police received a tip that Dollree Mapp and her daughter were harboring a suspected bombing fugitive, they immediately went to her house and demanded entrance. Mapp called her attorney and under his advice she refused to give them entry because they did not have a warrant. Later on that day more officers came to her door and demanded that they be allowed to enter her house. After Mapp refused, they opened a door to the house through forced entry. Knock down her door completely. Mapp confronted them and demanded to see the search warrant. The police waved a piece of paper in the air claiming it was the warrant and Mapp grabbed it and put it down her shirt. The police eventually got the "warrant" back from Mapp. Also when the cop took the paper back for the warrant for her Mapp was taking a deep thought on how was that was right for him to not let her see the information about the warrant. Next, Mapp was cuffed her feet and went on to search her entire house for the fugitive. When they reached her basement they found a trunk containing a small collection of pornographic books, pictures, and photographs. Mapp said the trunk was left in the basement by a previous tenant and was not aware of its contents. The officers arrested Mapp for violating an Ohio law which prohibited the possession of obscene material. On her arrest she knows the laws for Ohio but they didn’t even give her time to discuss or tell who use to live in their home before her. No fugitive or any evidence of one was ever found at the house. Nothing but pic what Mapp didn’t have a clue who they belong to. At her trial in the Court room, Mapp was charged based on the evidence that was presented by the police. Mapp's attorney questioned the police about the…

    • 742 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Supreme Court Issues: The Mapp V. Ohio Case
    • 1445 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Supreme Court Issues: The Mapp V. Ohio Case

    “The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated,” Mapp V. Ohio (1961) dealt with that very sentence of the constitution. Were the officers at fault or Mapp? This complex question has a complex answer one that puzzled the Supreme Court and led to a change in criminal procedure. The verdict was a strict interpretation of the constitution. The fourth amendment was relevant because the fourteenth amendment grunted due process. It was a very good decision, it protected the black minority who at the time were being routinely harassed and convicted for no reasons. This decision certainly did not stop that but it made it harder…

    • 1445 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Exclusionary Rule: Illegal Search And Seizure
    • 197 Words
    • 1 Page

    Exclusionary Rule: Illegal Search And Seizure

    To protect the American peoples 4th Amendment right “against unreasonable searches and seizures” from law enforcement using illegally seized evidence in a criminal trial against them, the exclusionary rule was created. The U.S. Supreme Court deemed any evidence illegally obtained inadmissible in a criminal trial, and any other evidence obtained during an illegal search and seizure inadmissible as well. This is known as the fruit of the poisonous tree doctrine.…

    • 197 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Charles Katz Case
    • 513 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Charles Katz Case

    Charles Katz v. United States 1967 is a United States Supreme Court case that examined the nature of illegal search and seizure and the right to privacy. This case was argued on October 17, 1967 until its decision date of December 18, 1967. The case was argued under some pretty influential justices; those that include Chief Justice Earl Warren and Thurgood “Mr. Civil Rights” Marshall although he did not vote. This case overturned the previous ruling of Olmstead v. United States back in 1927. This case set a very high precedent in the realms of privacy and immaterial intrusion with technology as a search because phone calls and private phones were becoming part of everyday life. Now the facts of the case are very laid out and clear. Charles…

    • 513 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Training Day Violations
    • 693 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Training Day Violations

    Alonzo and Jake pulled over a vehicle after viewing them buy drugs for recreational use. They used violent confrontation and intimidation towards the suspects and citizens, along while they seized they drugs. It triggered the citizens constitutional right but because the drugs were not in plain sight, nor did…

    • 693 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Who Established The Exclusionary Rule
    • 575 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Who Established The Exclusionary Rule

    In the landmark case Mapp v. Ohio the United States Supreme Court ruled that any evidence obtained during an illegal search and seizure was a violation of the 4th Amendment, which protects Americans from “unreasonable search and seizures.” Because of this ruling all illegal evidence obtained is inadmissible in court. Mapp v. Ohio became a precedent for law enforcement and in a court of law. The ruling officially established the exclusionary rule. The exclusionary rule was created to protect Americans from our very own law enforcement and courts.…

    • 575 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More

Related Topics