Preview

Royal Pregatives

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1633 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Royal Pregatives
THE ROYAL PREROGATIVE

A WHAT IS THE PREROGATIVE?

1. This note seeks to describe as fully as possible the extent of the prerogative. However, as will become clear, the exact limits of the prerogative cannot be categorically defined. The note goes on to describe the way in which the exercise of prerogative power is controlled by Parliament and the Courts.

2. There is no single accepted definition of the prerogative. It is sometimes defined to mean all the common law, ie non-statutory powers, of the Crown. An alternative definition is that the prerogative consists of those common law powers and immunities which are peculiar to the Crown and go beyond the powers of a private individual eg the power to declare war as opposed to the normal common law power to enter a contract.

3. Whichever definition is used there is no exhaustive list of prerogative powers. Some have fallen out of use altogether, probably forever - such as the power to press men into the Navy. It may be of more practical assistance to identify those powers which have been consistently recognised by the courts in the past, mindful of the encroachment into the prerogative as a result of the control exercised by Parliament and the courts.

Domestic Affairs

4. Although this is the area in which legislation has increasingly been introduced thereby limiting the extent of the prerogative, some significant aspects of the prerogative survive in the area of domestic affairs. These include:

• the appointment and dismissal of Ministers;

• the summoning, prorogation and dissolution of Parliament;

• royal assent to Bills;

• the appointment and regulation of the civil service;

• the commissioning of officers in the armed forces;

• directing the disposition of the armed forces in the UK;

• the appointment of Queen's Counsel;

• the prerogative of mercy. (This no longer saves condemned men from the scaffold but it is still used eg to

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    It can be argued that Prime ministers are almost omnipotent in the political system in the UK, this is due to the shear variety of powers in-which the prime minister holds, and the prerogatives that are taken advantage by the prime minister. However, checks on powers in the UK means that the prime minister is not as power as they appear, moreover, they are not separable from the UK political system, henceforth, they are controlled and limited within the system they are part of, thus, more often than not, prime ministers are less powerful then sometimes claimed.…

    • 1315 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    • Sections 51 & 52 assign legislative powers to Cth Parliament. • Characterisation = process of determining whether a law falls within one of these heads of power. • The question is whether the law relates to the subject matter or purpose of the heads of power in a way that allows it to be described as a law “with respect to” that head of power. • Simplest view of ‘characterisation’& the judicial review of legislation encapsulated by Roberts J in United States v Butler (1936)…

    • 982 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Before evaluating whether or not Parliament is sovereign, it’s important to define what sovereignty means. Sovereignty can be split into two; political and legal. Legal sovereignty is the ultimate power to make laws which will be enforced within the state. Members of Parliament and the Prime Minister have ultimate legal power because they propose and enforce legislation. Citizens have no legal sovereignty because they don’t play a role in the legislative function even though pressure group activity may influence decisions. Political sovereignty is where real political power lies, and depending on the situation political sovereignty doesn’t always lie within Parliament. Critics have argued that due to recent changes, Parliament is no longer truly sovereign. This essay will assess the arguments for and against.…

    • 1659 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Socials 10 notes

    • 1141 Words
    • 5 Pages

    2. Crown has ultimate power, beyond that held by any particular government at any particular time, it is vested in the queen, and in governor general as her representative. For example, if prime minister were to decide not to call an election within five years as required by law, governor general could order…

    • 1141 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In strict constitutional theory, power is shared between three elements - monarchy, Lords and Commons - and in the 1780s the first two of these elements had a larger role to play. In some instances this old system still impinges on the new. Parliamentary bills require passage by the House of Lords and ratification by the monarch before they carry the force of law. The powers of the upper House have been severely circumscribed in the twentieth century. It can now delay legislation but not permanently reject it. Few ministers of…

    • 7456 Words
    • 30 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Upper House Case Study

    • 1021 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Re: Authority of Parliament in relation to the Upper House, [1980] 1 SCR 54, 1979…

    • 1021 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    A.V Dicey gives an introduction to the doctrine of Parliamentary sovereignty as, “the principle of Parliamentary sovereignty means neither more nor less than this, namely, that Parliament thus defined has, under the English constitution, the right to make or unmake any law whatever; and, further, that no person or body is recognised by the law of England as having the right to override or set aside the legislation of Parliament’. However, there are many discussions as to whether the UK joining with the European Union and adherence to the Human Rights Act 1998 renders sovereignty irrelevant. It will be argued that although following these rules may appear to be contradictory to sovereignty, co-operation is entirely voluntary, necessary, and there are many examples as to why sovereignty is not irrelevant, nor archaic.…

    • 793 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    manner and form explained

    • 5701 Words
    • 23 Pages

    The other change of importance is the increasing use of constitutional implications as a means of constraining legislative power. While the High Court has given some guidance as to the application of constitutional implications at the Commonwealth level,3 particularly with regard to the implied freedom of political communication, there is very little understanding of how (or even if) the same principles can be applied to State Constitutions.…

    • 5701 Words
    • 23 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    Japanese Government

    • 3951 Words
    • 16 Pages

    The Upper House or The House of Councillors…………………………… 13 2. The Lower House or The House of Representatives………………………. 14 IV. Legislative Power…………………………………………………………….. 14-15 V. Judicial Power…………………………………………………………………. 15 A. Supreme Court……………………………………………………………….. 15 VI.…

    • 3951 Words
    • 16 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the next passage talks about how the legislative power needs to be established and in check. It is the supreme power of the commonwealth and unalterable. There are certain bounds on the legislature. Laws must be unvaried, laws must serve only the public, can’t raise taxes on the property of people without their consent, and can’t…

    • 595 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Role of Govenor General

    • 1871 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Many of these powers reflect an earlier, more active role taken by the monarch. In almost all cases today, however, these powers are carried out on the advice of the government of the day. In some instances, the head of state can exercise powers without, or against this advice.…

    • 1871 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Magna Carta set limits on the power of the King, but did not disrupt the balance of power between the beholder of the high positions in Britian. The English monarchs enjoyed almost full power through the 18th century; Henry VII and Elizabeth are examples. They answered to Parliament sometimes, but mostly the Parliament answered to them since they held more power. It wasn't until the 19th century that the things began to change and form a new leadership that we later changed into what we have today. One example I would like to refer to is the reign of Elizabeth II. Her reign has been considered an un-necessary reign in England’s history. Although Royal Prerogatives still exist in Britain, many doubt that they will be employed.…

    • 127 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    By virtue of the first, the prince or magistrate enacts temporary or perpetual laws, and amends or abrogates those that have been already enacted. By the second, he makes peace or war, sends or receives embassies; establishes the public security, and provides against invasions. By the third, he punishes criminals, or determines the disputes that arise between individuals. The latter we shall call the judiciary power, and the other simply the executive power of the state.…

    • 804 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Divine Right of Kings

    • 715 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The Divine Right of kings: What is it? The divine right of kings is the belief that monarchs or rulers received their rights to rule directly from God, so that all of their actions and decisions were supposedly derived straight from God. The wishes of God were uppermost; the consent and wishes of the people and subjects was rarely ever taken into consideration. A monarch was a direct representative of God. It was believed that a king had to have godly virtues in order to rule properly.…

    • 715 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Parliamentary Sovereignty

    • 659 Words
    • 3 Pages

    * UK powers of the government - while dependent on the electoral mandate – is unconstrained by any fundamental document and subject to Parliament’s approval.…

    • 659 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays