Preview

Rubout Argument Analysis

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1156 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Rubout Argument Analysis
RubOut

According to reports yesterday, July 23, 2013—the rubout argument has been proven by the investigative team. For this essay, the question will be—“Is it right to kill criminals?” Before we can answer the question, there are two things to consider? (1) Was the murdering of the two members of the Ozamiz group rooted on moralistic reasons—like what vigilantes do? Or (2), because the two “implicated” certain police officers [names]?
Here, we must answer both possibilities with an if-then argument. If (1) was true, then constitution-wise, it’s unquestionably wrong. This one can go a long way. First, the judge didn’t ask for their opinion for justice. In fact, the two we’re still going to have a trial. And by the new law—the death sentence has been, so to speak, rubbed-out. For if they killed the two for moral reasons like vigilantes would reason-out, then again it’s still wrong for no one has the right to put the law in his/her own hands.
…show more content…
For murder is killing without a reason to justify. But our (1) first case is within the definition of homicide. Here’s Encarta’s definition for homicide: “Homicide is a generic term, comprehending not only the crimes of murder and manslaughter but also the taking of a human life under circumstances justifying the act or in a sense excusing its commission. Thus, the killing of an enemy on the battlefield as an act of war is considered justifiable homicide, and killing, without malice, to save one's own life or the lives of one's dependents is termed excusable homicide.” Microsoft ® Encarta ® 2009. © 1993-2008 Microsoft Corporation. In our case, there was no self-defense. It just doesn’t fit within what’s called justifiable or excusable

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Analysis/Reasoning: The defendant couldn’t justify using self-defense because evidence shows that he was the aggressor in the situation. He is the reason that the situation escalated to the point where it did.…

    • 433 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Ring Vs Arizona Case Study

    • 1401 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The Supreme Court decided that juries rather than judges must make the determinations that subject a convicted murder to the death penalty. This was decided on a 7 to 2 decision.…

    • 1401 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    No. In a 7-to-2 decision, the Court held that a punishment of death did not violate the Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments under all circumstances.…

    • 502 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Since nothing like this happened prior the criminal code was very narrow on the sentencing for murder, this actually allowed changes to happen within the criminal code. Which would make sense given the circumstance. Before this situation everyone that was convicted with murder, didn’t have a legit reason as to why the person’s life was taken. In my opinion people just kill because they have problems within themselves of out of hate for the person. But in this situation there was a somewhat positive reason to why a life was being taken.…

    • 645 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Justification: If evidence exists to justify the defendant’s acts, the killing will not be considered murder or any crime at all. An intentional killing can be justified if the defendant acts in self-defense.…

    • 1409 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Robert Blecker’s “With death penalty, let punishment truly fit the crime” was printed on CNN August 22, 2013. In this article Blecker has a hard time drawing a line as to when capital punishment should be enforced. He uses many controversial topics that are attached to the death penalty to make the reader question their own belief on the death penalty. This article also questions the methods in which the United States uses for capital punishment. It makes the reader ask questions in their head such as, are some of these methods essential to the execution of a criminal? Lastly, this article questions the prison systems and the process in which the regulate prison life for criminals. Blecker composes this article with many premises, which are not backed up, to manipulate the reader to agree with his thoughts on capital punishment.…

    • 1359 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    When a person is found guilty of murder and they are given the death penalty, and later it is found that the person is innocent, you cannot correct it and bring them back to life. Is that justice? Every day in school we recite the pledge of allegiance and it states that we have justice for all but did Warren McCleskey receive the right justice? In the Preamble of the Constitution, the first thing it states is to establish justice. The Declaration of Independence states that all men are created equal and they have the rights to Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Happiness. Warren McCleskey received the death penalty after he was convicted of murder and the Supreme Court reviewed the case to figure out the proper sentence for Mr. McCleskey.…

    • 1049 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Gregg V. Georgia 1976

    • 464 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The primary question to be considered was if the imposition of the death sentence is prohibited under the Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments as "cruel and unusual" punishment. Similarly just a few years earlier in Furman v. Georgia (1972) it was ruled that capital punishment laws were violating the 8th and 14th amendments because they failed to prevent arbitrary ruling, and unpredictable application. However, between 1972 and 1976, 35 states passed new statutes authorizing the death penalty. This raises questions of whether a state's rights are being imposed, and should there be a national capital punishment standard, or should each state deal with the issue on an individual basis?…

    • 464 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Otzi Murder

    • 494 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Throughout this research project i learned a lot of different things about Otzi. Most of which leads me to my opinion of murder. I was also surprised the changing of the what happened. There are several times I changed my opinion because of the new theories that came up and the different facts. I’m glad i was able to do this project because i was able to learn a lot about Otzi and be able to form my own opinion of what happened to…

    • 494 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Week 1 Assignment Crt 205

    • 633 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Capital punishment has long been on the chopping block within many forums in America. Most in favor will argue, when considering the most heinous and wicked of crimes, criminals committing these crimes should be put to death. Those opposed will always take the stance that capital punishment is unacceptable in a civilized society in that it is a cruel form of punishment. My stance is one of support for capital punishment in the capacity that it is a necessity in respect to the basic premise of the severity of punishment being weighed against the circumstances of the crime.…

    • 633 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Legal experts say that they’ve never seen anything so ridiculous.“We have never heard of anything of this magnitude before its quite ridiculous.” says one of them.Many of the legal experts do not believe that it was right to place such a sentence in only 2 trials.They don’t think it is fair at all.However some experts say the death sentences placed Monday will definitely be reduced. “Mindless repression still seems to be the order of the day.” is said in the article,meaning that the jury really had no opinion in it because they were scared.…

    • 1797 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    On a 7-2 vote, the supreme court decided that the death penalty for the crime of murder did not violet the eight and fourteen amendment. Justice Stewart, Justice Powell, and Justice Stevens concluded that “The existence of capital punishment was accepted by the Framers of the Constitution, and for nearly two centuries this Court has recognized that capital punishment for the crime of murder is not invalid per se” (Gregg v. Georgia), our framers validated the use of capital…

    • 1367 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Roper V. Simmons

    • 307 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Conclusion- Despite the use of a questionable criteria, the U.S Supreme Court ruled it unconstitutional to sentence a minor to death.…

    • 307 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    8th Amendment Essay

    • 893 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The Eighth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution has generated a considerable amount of debate and controversy surrounding the question: what is considered “cruel and unusual punishment.” The important issue that develops from this amendment is whether or not the death penalty is constitutional. Over the decades, the Supreme Court fails to completely confront the issue by refusing to address any issue that falls outside of the case in question. As a result, today’s court is left with many specific instances where the death penalty is acceptable or unconstitutional, but not an overall principle that the death penalty is consistent or inconsistent with the Constitution. In Roper v. Simmons, seventeen year-old Christopher Simmons is tried as an adult…

    • 893 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The death penalty is a legal process whereby a person is put to death as a punishment for a crime. The death penalties are usually carried out for retribution of a heinous murder committed, such as aggravated murder, felony killing or contract killing. Every state handles what method they want to use to put a person to death according to their state laws. The death penalty is given by lethal injection, electrocution; gas chamber firing squad and hanging are some of the ways that certain states may carry out their death penalty procedures. I will present some views and personal opinion dealing with the pros and cons of the death penalty. The death penalty is such a life altering subject that affects all parties’ lives that are involved in the death penalty process. I personally have mixed feeling about the death penalty. I don’t know really if I would be a person that would support the death penalty or not. I do feel that murdering someone is wrong, and since no one really close to me has never been murdered. I don’t know if my feeling would change as being a supporter for the death penalty or not. I can only pray that God will help this county to make the right choices when comes to life or death.…

    • 1636 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays

Related Topics