Preview

Russia

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
722 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Russia
The main cause of the collapse of the Tsarist regime in Russia in 1917 was the First World War. Do you agree? Explain your answer.

In 1917 the rule of the Romanovs over Russia collapsed and Tsar Nicholas was forced to abdicate. He then offered the throne to his brother, who refused. There were many causes to the collapse of the Tsarist regime in 1917, including the First World War.
Russia entered the First World War for different reasons, including: to improve Tsar’s reputation in front of people after losing the Russo-Japanese war, to get influence and respect in Europe, to get land which is rich in resources (including a warm port) and, maybe, to reduce population and therefore it will be easier to deal with famines. And at first Russia was winning battles and was processing, until at the battle of Tannenberg the progression stopped. Moreover, in 1915 Tsar Nicholas assumed personal command over the army. This would mean that now the blame (or fame, if he would have won) would have been put on him. The Tsar resulted to be a poor commander, and soon the army was lacking basic resources such as rifles, millions of people were dying. The people became demoralised, thousands of men deserted. Now, without the support of the army, the Tsar was in a bad and unpleasant (and slowly worsening) situation.
Another cause of the happenings of 1917 was the discontent of the workers and peasants. Though it may not be less important than World War I, it definitely has killed and injured less people. The discontent of the workers and peasants has been since the start of the industrialization of Russia, before 1900. By 1900 20% of workers were living in major cities, in which the living conditions were awful, pays were low. Eve though strikes were illegal and were stopped by the royal army and lots of people were killed, the strikes didn’t stop. The peasants’ life had the same quality. Although they were allowed to buy small amounts of land, most then resold it and became

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    War broke out in 1914, with Tsar Nicholas becoming commander-in-chief in 1915, meaning he was away from Petrograd. Not only was this poorly thought out by Nicholas because it gave the people an opportunity to plot against him, but as he was away he left Tsarina (also a German princess), Alexandra, in charge during his absence. Due to the war being against Germany, this made the Russian people nervous and skeptical towards the extreme power she had over them during such a crucial time. Not only were they disgruntled by this, but also Alexandra’s close friendship to Rasputin, a Serbian peasant. This particularly angered the aristocracy and middle classes as they believed they were being led by someone of lower demeanor than that of themselves. This weakened support for the autocratic rule and lost the Tsar many of his supporters, which put him in a vulnerable position in the case of revolutionary upturn. This also could have inspired the peasantry to discover greater aspirations and encourage their belief that they could have greater status which in turn could trigger new revolutionary ideas amongst the lower classes. This demonstrates a link between Nicholas being away in order to commandeer army movement for the war, however it is arguable that it was a lack of authority and respect for the Tsarist regime that caused the change of opinions towards the Tsar amongst all classes, lessening his support and leaving him far more vulnerable in the case of a revolution.…

    • 1166 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    World War 1 was a crucial and defining factor which led to the collapse of the Romanov Dynasty in February, 1917. Without it a revolution would not have happened at this point in time. This is not to say a revolution would not have eventually happened, as there were many other contributing factors that sparked the revolution. However, what World War 1 essentially did was to heighten discontent throughout society enough for it to revolt.…

    • 875 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Nicholas II being the last tsar of the Romanov dynasty that lasted for over 300 years, is accountable for the fall of the Romanovs in 1917, however, there are various other reasons too that involved in the ultimate fall of tsarism in Russia in February 1917. While Nicholas’s indecisiveness played a major role in portraying his negligence, the other factors that involved the fall of tsarism were, the declining economic standards and the growth of political opposition along with Nicholas II’s penultimate absence when he was most needed in his country, due to the involvement in the first world war, which was another mistake made by the tsar.…

    • 313 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Great War was the main cause of the February 1917 Revolution. The Russian army suffered badly in the First World War due to a lack of equipment, inadequate training and poor leadership. The Tsar decided to take personal command of the army. As a result, he was blamed for the army's problems and defeats. World War I was a total disaster for Russia due to the Russian army suffering defeat after defeat at the hands of Germany. Cost of the war led to the economic collapse which then led to more anger and outrage, this shows that the Great War started a chain reaction of problems for Russia. Morale during this time was at an all-time low and soldiers and civilians alike were looking for someone to blame. In 1915, Tsar Nicholas II took personal command of the army and left St. Petersburg and moved to army headquarters in Russian, Poland. Nicholas II may have believed that, by taking charge, his army would be inspired and would fight with renewed vigour, however this had the opposite effect. Unfortunately, the Tsar knew little about the command and organisation of large military forces, and the series of defeats and humiliations continued. The organisation of the Russian army deteriorated and there were massive shortages of ammunition, equipment, and medical supplies which led to possibly the largest asset Nicholas had, the army, to lose belief and faith in…

    • 1065 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    By 1917 most Russians had lost faith in the leadership of Tsar Nicholas II. The first part of the Russian Revolution of 1917 was Russia's terrible involvement in World War I (1914-1918). Militarily, imperial Russia was no match for industrialized Germany, and the Russian death toll was greater than those sustained by any nation in any previous war. ("History.com"). The February Revolution started March 8, 1917 when rioters rioted for bread took to the streets in the Russian capital of Saint Petersburg. Troops were sent to Saint Petersburg to stop the riots; they opened fire and killed the people. In response to the way the riots were being handled Tsar Nicholas II gave up the throne on March 15. The October Revolution or Bolshevik Revolution was led by Vladimir Lenin who launched a nearly bloodless battle against the ad hoc government ("History."). The Bolsheviks and their allies occupied government buildings and other strategic locations in Saint Petersburg, and soon formed a new government with Lenin as its head; he became the virtual dictator of the first Marxist state in the world.…

    • 985 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Undeniably, Nicholas II had an enormous role in bringing about the downfall of the Romanov Dynasty in March 1917. Whilst many historians argue the fall of the Tsarist regime to be the direct response and product of World War I, it is quite evident that it was Nicholas’ inefficient and fatal autocratic ruling which led to the March Revolution of 1917. The effects of Russia’s involvement in numerous wars only heightened and highlighted Nicholas’ unsuitability for the role of Tsar, and his absolute and stubborn belief in autocracy. Had Nicholas’ various choices throughout his reign differed, the Romanov Dynasty could in fact, have existed…

    • 1391 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    By 1917, the Russian economy was in poor shape and near complete destruction because of the war effort. Food shortages were rampant which brought about civil unrest.…

    • 3026 Words
    • 18 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    At the front line the men only had three bullets and one rifle between two people and if every one ran out of bullets they would charge with bayonets and cavalry with sabers (a type of gun) this was one of their main tactics which they mainly trained and practice. There was also limited food, water and warmth, lots of people die of hunger and froze to death on the way to the battle and were too weak to fight when they arrived. In May 1915 Germany attacked Poland wiping out just under half of Russia's army, 1400 000 were kill in battle or got wounded and 976 000 were caught and became prisoners. The Germans had better attack and defense, they had bigger and deeper trenches and longer rang weaponry, and they had more ammo and could hold their position better. The Germans squads had twice as many guns and three times as much ammo as the Russian squads, their guns just mowed down the Russians like nothing. The main problem with the army was the transport, since Russia is so big it's hard to get troops, weapons, ammo, and food + water around to everyone. There was only two main train tracks running straight through the middle of Russia this made it hard to defend all around. All of this was blamed on the Tsar and because he was leading the army he was blamed for the massive defeat and the poor tactics. The State…

    • 945 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    It was the political naivete and extreme obstinance of Tsar Nicholas II that led to the outbreak of the Russian Revolution . Some aspects of the Tsar's behaviour definitely contributed to the fall of Russia , however lots of these qualities were not weaknesses in his character, but rather poor leadership qualities . Some of the causes included Tsar Nicholas II's autocratic rulership, the socio-economic changes happening at the time , famine and also the outbreak of WWI.…

    • 789 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The revolution of 1917 was the culmination of a number of factors coming together and causing the volatile mix of reasons to come together and boil over. The people of Russia where fed up with the horrible conditions they had to put up with and decided to do something about it. Some factor I will discuss include the industrialization,…

    • 1471 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    World War 1, also known as the ‘Great War’ had occurred during the years between 1914-1918 and had consisted of the major European powers: France, Russia, Austria/Hungary, Germany, and Britain. The Russo-Japanese war and the significance of the Russians’ defeat had clearly sparked the desperate need for political and economic development in Russia. Furthermore, the spark that initiated Russia’s demand for industrialization was the Trans-Siberian railway- created tension between the public of Russia. In the book, The First World War by Michael Howard, he states: “…terrified that industrial development, however essential it might be for military effectiveness, would only encourage demands for further political reform, and it suppressed dissidents with a brutality that only drove them to extremes of ‘terrorism’” (Howard, pg.6). From this reasoning by Howard, it could be interpreted that Russia’s start of industrialization and great weakness in their military sparked the interest of having mobilization and causing terror which eventually was one of the factors that led to the Great War.…

    • 956 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Russian Bolshevik Revolution leader Lenin argued that World War I was the result of insolvable competitions among imperialist powers. What are the rational elements in his argument? What other factors have also contributed to the outbreak of the WWI? (need your discussion of the conditions of Europe before the War)…

    • 525 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the Revolution of 1905, Russians gained new political freedom. However, Russia was still plagued with problems. The famine from previous years still raged on. In 1914, Russia joined World War I. To pay for the war, Russia raised taxes, secured foreign loans, and printed more money. This combined with many other factors, left the people of Russia wanting change. They needed the government to change, the famine to end, and economic stability.…

    • 715 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    History

    • 1023 Words
    • 5 Pages

    There were many reasons why the Romanov rule fell in the year 1917. I personally believe that the war was a major reason which led to the Tsar to abdicate but I also believe there are many other reasons which led to the Tsar to abdicate.…

    • 1023 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Bolshevik Takeover

    • 592 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In March of 1917 in Russia, The Tsar, Nicholas II had little choice. The Great War (as it was known as at that time) had turned into a disaster, conditions at home were horrible, and the Menshevik government had forced Nicholas to abdicate He did this for himself and his son and gave the power to his brother. His brother gave up the power the next day because the country was in such disarray. After that, the Provisional Government took power. By November of 1917 in Russia, the Provisional Government was in complete collapse. In the meantime, the Bolshevik party, which was helped by German money, had built up an efficient party organisation, had a brilliant propaganda machine, and a powerful private army know as the Red Guards.…

    • 592 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays