Top-Rated Free Essay
Preview

Russia to Siberia 1930-1940 Migration Trend

Good Essays
493 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Russia to Siberia 1930-1940 Migration Trend
Migration happens in all countries of the world, it is an important piece of our civilization. Everyday people migrate around the world for a better place to live. People migrate because they want it or because they are forced to.

Between 1930 and 1940 many Russians migrated to Siberia. The second world war was going on in that time. Many people were deported to Siberia, especially anti-communists. The push factor’s of this trend are economical and political trends. In the Soviet Russia that time there were big problems with politics. Joseph Stalin was in power. From 1932 to 1933 there was the soviet famine leading to the deaths of millions. Peasant’s hided their crops since that the communist party of Stalin said that 44% of the grain must be procured. This meant that the peasant’s would not have any more crops for themselves so they keep-ed the crops secret. But because of that there was not enough crop’s on the market making the price high and many people starved to death. This made many want to move to a place where the price of crop’s were not as high. Also many people were refugees of the actions of the NKVD, the secret police of the communist party. People that were anti-communist were deported to Siberia.

Many people wanted to get job’s in that time for their own economical situation. In the 1930’s the industrialization began in siberia. Many mine’s were build to feed the factory’s in the west. Many people could work in those mine’s wich made them a small amount of money for their daily lives. Also Siberia was a big place. You could’ve easily lived in a city without someone ever finding you. This made it more safe to hide for the NKVD then living in the big cities such as Moscow or Sint-Petersburg.

Many people were scared since of the NKVD people were deported. Because of that people participated in anti-soviet rebels hoping that they would stop killing people. But mostly Russia had benefits since people who were deported and worked in mines were helping the soviets of supplies for their factory’s. Also since the NKVD had the power to let people dissapear it was a positive thing for them.

Because of the big group immigrating to Siberia land was used intensively. This led to frequent bad harvests of crops. Also because of that a big group of rich farmers in Siberia were now losing money, causing the economical state of Siberia to drop rapidly. Since many people were deported, many camps were set up. This also made a bad reputation of the Siberians.

Since many people immigrated into Siberia, the internal passport system was introduced, requiring people to obtain permission before migrating to different regions. This made migration slow down and giving it an end to the migration trend. What we can conclude is that people mostly migrate only for their own goods.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Stalin Dbq Research Paper

    • 567 Words
    • 3 Pages

    There were several reasons. Stalin sought to reorganize the Soviet Union via his Five Year Plans, which called for a radical industrialization as well as collectivisation to increase agricultural production and efficiency. This increased agricultural output was necessary to support the rapid industrialization he espoused; how else could the workers be fed? Many peasants who had been awarded or taken their land...to liquidating the kulaks as a class" (Document 5.3 Collectivisation 181). Millions were sent to labor camps, deported and died. The impossible demands made on the peasant farmers of increased production, only to turn everything over to the state, resulted in peasants that remained on the land at first hiding, then burning their crops/killing their animals rather than give them up "Stock was slaughtered every night..." (History in Quotations #5). An infuriated Stalin sent industrial workers into the country to show the peasants 'Bolshevik firmness' "without any rotten liberalism...[or] bourgeois humanitarianism...[and with]extreme measures" to get the grain. (Document 5.4 Horror in the Village…

    • 567 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    From the years 1906 – 1914, Peter Stolypin was pushing to de – revolutionise the peasantry and put into place economic reform, and there is evidence of this working. During these years large amounts of agricultural reform were set in motion. In 1906 45.9 million tonnes of agricultural production was produced, by 1913 this had grown significantly to 61.7 million tonnes. The massive change in the amount of product shows that agricultural and therefore economic reform had taken place. Farmers, at this time, had also started paying higher taxes, which is sign of higher income, again strengthening this idea of economic reform occurring. Stolypin, however successful he was in his endeavours, was pushing fiercely for a more independent and de-revolutionised peasantry. During November 1906, huge action was taken to change the way the peasants lived. They were freed from the constraints of commune control and land banks were set up to give money to those peasants who chose to leave. Many were also encouraged to move to Siberia, all of these reforms were starting to lay a foundation for a more independent peasantry. Economic reform was being pursued desperately by members of the government such as Stolypin, this can been seen by the copious amount of law, for example peasants leaving commune control, being put into place. The fact these laws were coming about shows that Russia was undergoing economic reform to some extent during this period, whether it was successful or not.…

    • 1040 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Many of the opposition fled to other European countries where they continued to plot against the Tsar. This shows how Alexander lll had caused Russia to go back in progress politically by exiling all of their possible contenders. This allowed the Tsar to have much more control over Russia much like before Alexander ll reign. The persecution of Jews caused many to join radical parties and organisations. This shows us how there was not even the slightest bit of democracy within Russia, and how Alexander lll had caused Russia to go back in progress. Another major problem in Russia was the growing population of peasants. This caused famines within Russia in 1892 and 1893. This famine was a cause of many peasants death which shows how Russia did not have the money or resources to keep up with their growing population. This showed a lack in progress as they could not even support their country’s people with…

    • 794 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    This period of time ensured many changes, positive and negative regarding the labor system. It is evident that serfdom congealed from about 1750 onwards, meaning that the peasants were required to provide free labor for a particular number of days a year or a specific amount of money to their lords. The time of labor depended on when it was needed. For example, during harvesting or sowing. The job had to be done, regardless, the peasants own farming responsibilities. Subsequent to the emancipation of serfs in 19th century, they had to buy their own freedom, as they were granted land they also had to pay for working on it. Eventually, such strict limitations caused farmers and peasants to leave their farming business and seek more opportunities in large urban areas. That lead to Russia’s rapid industrialization during the 18th. However, prior to Russia's industrialization workers set up guilds to protect their interests. Such guilds were often set up in areas where workers migrated to work - such as logging camps, and were often communal. Although, as the industrialization finally occurred in 19th century, people traveled to cities seeking more opportunities, causing the population to extremely swell. Such overpopulation ensued in dangerous working conditions, very poor sanitation and exploitation of the workers. Such circumstances were very hard to fight off as Russia didn’t have a very strong reformist movement to address such problematic aspects of the society. Unsuccessful attempts to reform the working class troubles, resulted in growing unrest and discontent among all. Eventually, public announcement of opinions was strictly forbidden and punished by a trip to Siberia, which was later widely expanded by the…

    • 278 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Draft ESSAY

    • 1114 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Over time, the Russian land and people have changed to accommodate for their needs but they have also kept some aspects the same whether it was for the better or the worse. Throughout 1801 and 1939, many things changed in the Soviet Union while keeping many things the same.…

    • 1114 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The soviet during the war expected to receive great rewards in terms of their hard work during the war and they expected to receive greater personal freedom and living standards. But the people were…

    • 1061 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Collectivization was designed to modernize Russia’s agriculture by merging farms and placing them under state control. In the short term, this policy resulted in famines and Stalin’s ‘war’ against the Kulaks; wealthy peasants who opposed communism. By 1935, 5 million people had died from starvation and all 7 million Kulaks had been liquidized, through shooting or the labour camps or ‘Gulags’. However, by 1939, Collectivization was working efficiently with 99% of land merged and 90% of peasants living ¼ of a million Kolkhoz. Although at a heavy price, the exports needed to obtain the capitol for industrialization had been acquired.…

    • 1040 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Pereskotia was a difficult era in Russian and Soviet history but specifically it was an era of political reformation Mikhail Gorbachev was trying to adopt a policy of "glasnost" (openness) is believed to be what led to the downfall of the Soviet Union. In addition,it was about testimonies of young people had while the had cadifficult time overcoming the political reformation. Individuals were not prepared for the change in the economy. During the transition of the USSR there was a huge increase in inflation Hurting people because they couldn't afford food or normal household supplies. They went from solid, stable childhoods, to struggling for food.…

    • 505 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The peasants were probably the worst off in Russia in the early twentieth century. Although the peasants had been emancipated by Alexander II back in 1861, they still had little freedom while Nicholas was leading. Peasants had to pay redemption payments for land the government had given or lent them but they found it difficult to keep up and often got into debt. The village communities owned and paid for the land together, not as a single person. Peasants had to pay much higher taxes than the landlords and the officials would flog the peasants who didn’t pay their taxes. There were so many pressures in day to day life that many peasants could not support themselves and had to move to cities for work. Peasants had to be granted permission by their fellow commune members to leave the farm. Even once they had left, they were still expected to assist with the redemption payments (Proctor, 1995). The living standards the peasants and their families had to endure were terrible. Russian peasants were still forced into using traditional farming techniques which involved manual labour instead of machine labour. Entire families occupied one room huts and sometimes the living quarters were shared with their livestock. This meant epidemic diseases were prevalent. Peasant’s diets were insufficient and unvaried, mostly…

    • 1124 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Russian people wanted the government to change. There had been a dramatic increase in the number of radical newspapers. Therefore, people did not want a conservative reformation, but a radical revolution. They also did not trust the current government, because of many reasons, one of them being Rasputin.…

    • 715 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    They felt that if they were able to vote they could get their voice to be heard. Lastly, Russians left Russia after the two main cities Sweden and Denver, were destroyed in The Christmas Hurricane in 1902. This vicious hurricane ruined almost all of the land and killed almost half of the population. There was many reasons Russians left their…

    • 1238 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    AP human

    • 2268 Words
    • 10 Pages

    Migration can be international (between countries, either voluntary or forced) or internal (within a country, either interregional or intraregional).…

    • 2268 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Migration is the movement of people from one place to another. The reasons for migration can be economic, social, political or environmental. There are usually several push and pull factors behind the choice made. Migration has always been present, starting when people navigated to conquer and discover new regions.…

    • 1186 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Many people from many countries come from all over the world migrating from their original country. They may come for many issues. They mostly come because of pull and pull factors. Some push factors are that they don't have good resources for survival, Their economy is…

    • 808 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    After 250 years of living under Russian Tsarist rule, the Ukrainians became part of the Soviet Union in 1922. Farmers thrived, economic freedom was permitted, and private enterprise was allowed. Among these, writers, artists, and scholars grew. Stalin, in 1924, took over Russia after the previous leader, Vladimir Lenin, died. Later, in 1928, Stalin launched a plan to force farmers into giving up their private land, livestock, and farms. Joseph Stalin felt he could not trust the Ukraine peasantry; he believed that the upper class farmers, or kulaks, were holding crops. Stalin took all the grain from the peasants. He had his men search for any hidden grain and Stalin analyzed fecal matter to see if the Ukrainians had stolen ‘government property’ and eaten the grain themselves. It was because of Stalin that many starved and resorted to eating anything. They drank water to fill their empty bellies. Small children perished first, then the elderly, followed by the men, and soon after, the women. Up to twenty-five percent of the population died because Stalin took all of the food.…

    • 742 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays