Preview

Russian Absolutism

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
646 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Russian Absolutism
Russian Absolutism
From the middle of the sixteenth century to the end of the eighteenth century three rulers stand out, remaining significantly more influential than other rulers of the period of Russian history. During the two hundred and fifty year period Russia witnessed three enlightened rulers, Ivan IV, Peter I, and Catherine II. Yet their enlightened dispositions were merely facades to hide ulterior motives of gaining more absolute power. They primarily sought to increase their power on the Russian throne. During Ivan IV’s rule, 1533 to 1584, Ivan IV enacted a variety of both enlightened and despotic policies. During the beginning of his reign Ivan IV was kept even-tempered by his wife, Anastasia. Ivan IV freed Russia from the Tatars’ grasp, gained quite a bit of new territory in the name of Russia, sought a new law code, reformed the government, replaced the hereditary rule with one of electoral, established trading routes to England through the port Archangles, and organized the Zemskii Sobor.
Yet Ivan IV’s reign of enlightenment was followed by a reign of cruelty, demonstrating his capacity of despotism. After the death of Anastasia, Ivan IV became capricious and began to show despotic tendencies. He oppressed the church, purged the Boyars, formed the Oprichnina which lead to the deaths of many people, further tied the peasants to the land; on the whole Ivan IV merely sought to make his power absolute. Ivan IV ultimately enhanced the power of the sole ruler of Russia.
Like Ivan IV, Peter the Great executed many enlightened policies. He sought to modernize Russia through ship building, mining, metallurgy, textiles, and canal building. Other enlightened policies enacted were the creation of a merit based system within the military and government, strengthening the education system, eliminating the Boyar Duma, and the attempt to reorganize towns in an attempt to strengthen local democracy.
Though Peter I did not only create enlightened

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Ivan IV-also ivan the terrible; killed many of the Russian nobles, or boyars that he suspected of conspiracy.…

    • 416 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    This man is known as Peter the Great and was considered to be a absolute monarch. Peter and his brother Ivan were both rulers until his brother died, making Peter sole ruler of Russia. One of his greatest accomplishments were founding the city of St. Petersburg. Russia also became one of the most powerful Europe countries while Peters ruling. Peter had faced many different challenges as he ruled but one of the biggest ones was the power of the nobles. He ultimately influenced Russia by laying a strong foundation for Russia by many cultural, education, and architectural achievements.…

    • 98 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Both Russian rulers largely reformed their country by introducing ideas and customs from Western Europe. Peter the Great was especially known for his trip to Western Europe and bringing back knowledge of finance, politics, military, etc. Through his reform of the military system and the nobility and construction of many factories, Peter brought Russia up to the surface from its longtime submersion under the ice. Catherine the Great was known for her adoption of Enlightenment ideas, even if she wasn’t able to get far in applying those ideas in Russia.…

    • 668 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    He left Moscow threatening to relinquish his throne as tzar of Russia. Due to his very apparent paranoia he made it law that all law breakers and traitors with execution and seizure of property. 24 years following Ivan put in place what those call a “Reign of Terror”, that reign involved destroying the major boyar families in the Russian region furthermore earning himself the “Gronzy” translating to mean “sparking terror/fear” which is exactly what Ivan the Terrible was known for putting fear in people’s hearts. During that same time Ivan beat his daughter-in-law who was pregnant at the time, causing her to have a miscarriage; Ironically creating the Oprichniki thereafter, the first official secret Russian police…

    • 440 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Ivan IV (or Ivan the Terrible) was the ruler of Russia from 1533-1584. Ivan IV is credited for creating an absolute monarchy in Russia. He gained Mongol land for Russia and expanded the Russian economy on a small scale. Although Ivan IV accomplished these goals for Russia, he does deserve his nickname, Ivan the Terrible. Ivan IV was a very intelligent man, but many people believed that he was mentally ill. This would explain his violent outbursts and his infamous behavior. His troubled childhood might be a possible explanation for his outburst issues.Both of his parents died before he was 8 years old. After his parents death he was faced with constant danger and neglect, which led to him hating the boyar class and torturing small animals as…

    • 393 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Whap Chapter 18 Hrt

    • 1071 Words
    • 5 Pages

    3. Ivan IV: Ivan the terrible; confirmed power of tsarist autocracy by attacking authority of boyars (aristocrats); continued policy of Russian expansion…

    • 1071 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Ivan IV, Tsar of Russia is better known as Ivan the terrible. In the following paragraphs I will depict major events in his life and the role he played in Russia. I will also exhibit the many positive things that he did. As well as the negative things that he did to Russian society during his reign…

    • 518 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    All state leaders across the whole period held qualities that didn’t please the whole of the population in Russia. During the reign of Alex II, the government showed some strength with controlling opposition from the peasantry through the emancipation of the serfs in 1861. It was thought that to prevent revolt from below, this was a key movement that had to be made, and therefore prevented future unrest and opposition. However, the new liberated serfs had to deal with more laws concerning land ownership with led to further unrest and repression in the peasantry by the state. The state moreover, appeased the most vocal critics but in such a way that allowed dissenters to express themselves in the knowledge that Tsar’s decision would be final. Compared to Nicholas II’s reign, this showed a decisive leading technique, as Nicholas’s style was more conservative, and showed weakness, relying on others’ advice to fuel his decisions. A key failure throughout his period was the mixed rule attempt with the Duma introduced from 1906 to 1917, it is arguable that Nicholas II made concessions only to keep opposition temporarily at bay and that his aim was to uphold the principle of autocracy.…

    • 1646 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Alexander ll became Tsar in 1855 after succeeding Tsar Nicholas l and was regarded as a “liberator” throughout his time as Tsar, until an attempted assassination attempt on him in 1866 were he turned more reactionary. Alexander ll was assassinated in March 1881, he was not radical and believed in a slow and progressive change, due to this he gathered much opposition to him and was eventually killed by The Peoples Will, and this kicked off ‘the era of great reforms’ [5].…

    • 3481 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Peter the Great made many reforms in the interest of Russia such as the reorganization of the Government, in the military, the economy and also in the appearance of his social structure to reflect western ideals. After a visit West did he decide that Russia was not suitable for the modern advancements of their neighboring European nations. Not only did Peter adopt the standard of living of the western European world; his efforts sped up Russia's development greatly.…

    • 377 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Peter the Great made a great effort to change Russia and he conquered his ideas and what he wanted to do with his nation. He strengthened the military, created a navy, and stopped the isolation of Russia.…

    • 255 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Ivan the Terrible wasn’t all that great. He became the Grand Prince of Moscow at the age of three. Ivan the Terrible killed his son in a heated argument with his wife. Ivan’s return marked the beginning of a 24-year long reign of terror. The reign of Ivan the Terrible wasn’t the greatest. In the paragraphs below it will explain the points in depth.…

    • 332 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    “I have conquered an empire but I have not been able to conquer myself”(quotezine). Peter the Great built the foundation Russia stands on today, and enabled Russia to become the world power that we know today. Some may credit Peter with inciting westernization in Russia, but westernization started prior to when he was born. After delivering thirteen children to Tsar Alexis I, Maria Miloslavskaya died trying to give birth to her fourteenth child. Out of five sons two survived ( Fedor III and Ivan V), and out of eight daughters only six survived(Massie 34). Within a year after Miloslavskaya death, he found her successor Natalya Naryshkina, a ward of Artemon Matveev. With her semi-Western upbringing, the Tsaritsa was an instrument of change. She brought music into the palace ( something that was once banned), sponsored a royal theater. With her help “Alexi’s painful religious quality gave way to a fun, spirited, eagerness to accept Western ideas entertainments, and techniques”(Massie 44). Peter the Great forcefully pushed Russia to become more western through his class system, policies, and military, but he did so at the expense of his people.…

    • 1708 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    At first, the riots of Moscow called for his attention in the year following his coronation as tsar and he made clear decisions with the help of his able advisors (Thompson, 2012, p.65). He eventually created the zemskii sobor which he relied on multiple times in the next few years for consultation on many important matters (Thompson, 2012, p.65). Another aspect of Tsar Ivan IV’s personality was that of his religious priority. Tsar Ivan IV strengthened the ties with the church and was devoted to ridding Russia of the sinful while “carrying out God’s will” (Thompson, 2012, p.63). However, the side of Tsar Ivan IV that was and is not widely discussed was that of his innate knowledge of leadership and control in Russia. He was clearly an able, intelligent leader who was troubled, but wanted to do right by his country and his men. After all, that is exactly what he thought he did, even with an unusual mental status. However, his rage continued to build up and his pathological personality dominated his decisions after his wife Anastasia died. Since Anastasia was said to have a rather calming influence on him, Tsar Ivan IV had to learn to live without his woman, and that changed his more subdued personality to an intense version (Thompson, 2012, p.65). It was also claimed that due to an illness, rumored to be encephalitis, his personality problem intensified because the disease can cause a character…

    • 1152 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Ivan IV (The Terrible)

    • 1710 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Without a leader, his people begged for him to return. He made a deal with the Muscovites, that if he came back and led them, he would get absolute power and control of the area, with the ability to punish traitors and lawbreakers with confiscation of property and execution. This state he created was called the Oprichnina. When he returned to rule, he began executing all of the local boyars, who he believed had killed his mother and his wife and then started his reign of terror for 24 years upon all of the boyars of Russia. At this point in his reign of terror, he was four times remarried but still had not succeeded in recapturing the happiness that he enjoyed with Anastasia. Also during this time, through the Oprichnina, Ivan IV created his own private army to act as bodyguards and secret police, called the Oprichniki. The Oprichniki contained 1,000-6,000 men. He destroyed all of the major Boyar families in the area and not just the men, he ordered the execution of women and children as well. One of his worst displays of terror is the sacking of Novgorod. Novgorod was a very wealthy city and was a strategic defense point for the Livonian war. Vasilyevich was paranoid, and believed that the city would defect to the enemy, so Ivan sent the Oprichniki to pillage Novgorod and all areas around it. He killed thousands of families and left nothing behind. All of the lands that he claimed was given to his chosen class of gentry. He tortured his enemies and even friends for simply displeasing him. He boiled them in oil, cut out their tongues, and impaled them on spikes, starting at the top, the more the person moved, the faster the spike would move through them, and this was a very long and drawn out death. This and many other heinous displays of rage led him to be nicknamed “Grozny”. This roughly translates to formidable or sparking terror or fear. The…

    • 1710 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays