Preview

Russian Labor System Essay

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
650 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Russian Labor System Essay
The changes and continuities of the Russian labor system from the years of 1750 to 1914 were that it changed from a serf based labor system in an attempt at industrialization, but remained the same in terms of its worker repression and that Russia never became a fully industrialized economy due to industrial discontent. The Russian labor system changed in that it went from being serf based to an attempt at an industrial economy. The labor system in Russia went from a serf-based economy and began industrialization when Czar Alexander II instituted the emancipation of the serfs in 1861 as a means of making the country more industrialized and strengthening the Russian empire. Once emancipated, many serfs fled to large cities or countrysides where they could find land and work they would be paid for. The prime mover of Russian Industrialization was Count Sergei Witte, minister of finance from 1892 to 1903. The centerpiece of his industrial policy was an ambitious program of railway …show more content…
The government sought to balance the interests of lords and serfs, but in this balance, the terms of emancipation were unfavorable to most peasants. Serfs won their freedom, had their labor obligations gradually After serfs were emancipated and went to find work elsewhere, they found that they still could not get away from the difficulties of their feudal position. Peasants who worked in Russian factories between 1750 and 1914 were overworked and underpaid, and serfs who attempted to farm had to pay to do so. Serfs won their freedom, had their labor obligations gradually canceled, and gained the opportunity to become landowners. However, they had won few political rights and had to pay a redemption tax for most of the land they received. Most peasants and serfs found themselves in debt for the rest of their lives; a source of alienation and

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    However, there was increasing criticism of the institution of serfdom. The Russian empire had, since the reign of Ivan III, been a largely serf based rural nation. 85% of the populations at this time were peasants and most of those, serfs. A serf was someone who was owned by the Land lord, usually a member of the nobility, the serf would work there land until there death, with very little freedoms and certainly no education.…

    • 1073 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    2. A move to industrialization was part of the process of change. In Russia, state support was vital, because it lacked a middle class and capital. A railway system was created in the 1870s. It reached the Pacific in the 1880s. Siberia was opened to development and increased Russian involvement in Asia. Under Count Wittle, the government passed…

    • 947 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Between 1750 and 1914, England, Germany, and Western Europe were all expanding. England was gaining land and trust in the Middle East, Germany was becoming an established nation, and Western Europe was thriving due to the Industrial Revolution. After recognizing all of this, Russia decided it was time for reform or be left in the dust. This caused major changes in Russia’s labor system such as emancipation of the serfs and industrialization to keep up with the changing world. Although they were going through these changes, there were continuities such as the treatment of the serfs and the type of reform they were doing.…

    • 565 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Many historians argue The Emancipation of the Serfs in 1861, to be a key turning point within Russian history. It drastically altered Russia’s economic, political and social stipulation. One could propose the argument that this event lead to the fall of communism in 1990, further more suggesting the extent to which this event affected Russia. Hence this is ‘perhaps the most defining moment in Russian history, with its impact being seen many years after the event itself’. Although historians identify short term effects of this event, the significance to which this event developed Russian government and society up to the 21st century has been so tremendous that they cannot be disregarded. However when one considers the argument of the likes of Louis Hobart who suggests the event was only a contributing element to ‘the social and economic transformation’ it must be asked to what extent was this event alone a key turning point in the development of Russian Government?…

    • 1456 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    In 1861 was the Emancipation of the Serfs. The Serfs originally belonged to landowners but the Tsar bought land for the Serfs to live on. However, the landowners sold the Tsar bad land for the Serfs to live and work on. This made the Serfs extremely unhappy as they had to start work from the beginning on bad land which they were paying a lot for.…

    • 469 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Alexander ll recognized as the Tsar liberator was known mostly for the emancipation of the serfs. Serfs were the biggest social problem Russia faced as 80% of the population were serfs or state peasants. Serfdom had existed elsewhere in Europe in the 19th century but 1885 Russia was the only major power which kept serfdom. Eventually in 1861 Alexander ll issued an imperial decree which abolished serfdom. This was a huge step for Russia in the 19th century as it showed that they trying to do something about their progression in time. However this did not mean that former serfs were…

    • 794 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Despite being emancipated, the serfs were still not completely free citizens, which is one of the ways that the Russian state had not improved. It was made difficult for the peasants to get passports, restricting movement around the country. This was done as an attempt to keep the peasants tied to the land, so that Russia’s main industry, agriculture, wouldn’t suffer. Also, it was to keep the nobility happy, because they thought they would lose their workforce, and it was their support that kept the tsar in power.…

    • 613 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Instead peasants were transferred into working in factories due to the increase of industrialization in this period. The factories proved to need more labor in them to produce a significant amount of goods. The demand for peasant workers was not as high as it used to be because of slave labor. As more people began to own slaves, they did not find much use for indentured servants anymore. Some freedom of the peasants was also being taken away.…

    • 1344 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    After the war in 1856 Nicholas's son Alexander II decided to move Russia toward modern needs and social changes. Alexander believed that his reforms would allow Russia to compete with western Europe for world power. The first of Alexander's reform was an official order for freeing the serfs in 1861. However, putting an end to serfdom only went halfway. Instead of individual peasants, peasant communities were given about half the farmland in the country, nobles kept the other half and the government paid the wealthy people for their land. However, each peasant community had 49 years to pay the government for the land it had received. Therefore, while the serfs were legally free the money that was owed still tied them to the land. Political and…

    • 225 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Topic: Analyze the changes and continuities in labor systems between 1750 and 1914 in RUSSIA.…

    • 424 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Throughout this time period the ruling elite, who made up 1.1% of the population despite owning 25% of the land, maintained constant support of the Tsar. This support was based on reliance in the Tsars rule in order to ensure their own aristocracy. The nobles controlled the land Therefore through the nobility’s control of land and as a result the means of production, the Tsar had autocratic power over the majority who worked this land; the peasants, both of state (32.7%) and through the nobility 50.7% as despite the emancipation of serfs in 1861 the lives of these peasants were heavily restricted and reliant on the land owners through the Mir, censorship, tax and redemption payments, of which many could not pay for and so were forced into debt. the peasants themselves, being both restricted in the Mir and due to their traditional attitudes and acceptance of social situation, what Marx would call a lack of revolutionary consciousness, can be attributed to the Tsarist survival.…

    • 2563 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Both Mary Shelley’s 1818 gothic novel Frankenstein and Ridley Scott’s 1982 film Blade Runner explore the dehumanising effects of technology. Although the texts differ in context they connect through their exploration of transcendent societal concerns. A key theme explored in both texts is the dangers associated with unrestricted and dehumanising technology.…

    • 707 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    A Nationwide Revolution

    • 1615 Words
    • 7 Pages

    The first reason for the revolution in 1905 was the developments in the Russian countryside and how they produced a general unhappiness among the landowners and even the peasants. A long-term social and economic cause was the continuing dissatisfaction of both these groups to the Emancipation reform of Alexander II in 1861. The Landowners did not approve of the act because it denied them the free labour they had access to before the emancipation of the serfs. They had lost their free labour and large amounts of their land. By 1905 many of the Landowners were facing large debts. Although the act did end serfdom in Russia, the peasants were still angry due to the redemption payments they were expected to pay and the poor quality of land they received. They also disliked the fact that they were still tied to the…

    • 1615 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The abolition of serfdom in 1861, under Alexander II, and the reforms which followed were a ‘watershed’, ‘a turning point’ in the history of Russia. After being soundly defeated in the Crimean War (1853-56), Russia was fully exposed to her backwardness in all fields- military, economic, social and administrative. The reforms under Alexander II, an aftermath of the war were undertaken to air the grievances of different sections of society. During the late 1860s and 70s, a more assertive public opinion was emerging with recurrent outbreaks of student protest and formation of a small but dynamic underground revolutionary movement, which pressurized the government for more changes.…

    • 3563 Words
    • 15 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    A majority of reforms made by the Tsar were social, and as the reign continued these reforms slowly became a reactionary introduction of policies designed to keep hold of autocracy. One of the first reforms introduced by Alexander was the emancipation of the Serfs in which all who wanted to be free could now own a share of land and live in a family home, paying normal dues. However many believe that this was not a real reform due to the sheer lack of basic freedom.…

    • 1218 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays