30% of individuals die annually because of lack to medications that can save them, and 10% of them are children. Thats almost half the percentage! Children are more venerable to illnesses and harsh sickness than adults due to the fact that their bodies are still developing. What if on the National Buy Nothing Day that one child that has for instance, epilepsy, runs out his precious medication that prevents seizures. At any moment in the day he could experience pain in their head and in a blink of an eye, they are having a seizure. On the daily, 2/3 children die a day from seizures and helpful medication prevents this from ever happening. How must it feel for a mother to know that you can't go and buy your child medication because the government just shut down all stores for a day that may open the eyes to consumers? Anxiety that passes through mother knowing their child is at any time vulnerable to a life-taking…
Not only are they buying ridiculous unnecessary items, that are not good for the body, but the price these items cost is just annoying. WIC another government program that gives money to mothers in need, is what I feel EBT needs to follow in the matters of items people can buy. What I like about WIC is that is only lets the mothers buy the necessities to take care of themselves and their babies such as milk, baby food, beans, cheese, produce, and grains. With EBT it should follow some of those policies, with some alterations. My ideal food stamps for people in need would be and certain amount in red meat and pork that could be purchased, there would be no soda, energy drinks, candy bars, ice cream, cookies, cakes, basically all the food items that have bad nutritional value and are just plain unnecessary. The next add on to my version of EBT is at least one person on the EBT card has a full-time job and show proof of employment every two months, along with everyone in the house hold being tested for drug use. I feel that if I’m going to have to help pay for their food then they should have restrictions. For those who read my paper I’d be interested in your ideas on restrictions for…
The Child Nutrition Act of 1966 has since formed and developed many programs beneath it to aid those in poverty. The five top producing programs under the Child Nutrition Act in fiscal year 2010 include the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP), the National School Lunch Program, and the Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children (WIC), the Child and Adult Care Food Program, and the School Breakfast Program. WIC serves 45-50 % of all infants born in the United States (Facing Hunger in America, 2011, para. 3). According to Kowaleski-Jones & Duncan (2002), much of the research on the effects of WIC participation on children has focused on the potential benefits of increased use of prenatal care, increased Medicaid savings, better infant outcomes, and less infant mortality. In addition to the previously stated, WIC’s effectiveness can be supported by the perception of “WIC Works,” (Kowaleski-Jones, & Duncan, 2002). The observation that “WIC works,” is driven by the great deal of research for WIC partakers to birth healthier offspring (Kowaleski-Jones, & Duncan, 2002). For example, each dollar spent on WIC saved the state at least $1.77 to $3.13 in health care costs (Bitler, & Currie, 2004).…
the margin while also helping these families make ends meet. One should conclude that raising…
Health Care spending cost are growing faster than the state of the economy as a whole and faster than the people can work to earn it. The United States has the most exspensive health care system in the world because it is based on health expenditures for each person and a sum percent of expenditures found on the GDP. Expenses on health care in the United States have been rising at an alarming rate and the economy has been unable to keep up for quite a while now, presenting challenges not only for Medicare and Medicaid, but for the private sector as well. As health care costs continue to consume a large portion of the nation’s financial revenue, Americans will be forced to make very difficult decisions about whether to provide health care for their families or possibly put food on the table. In the previous years alone prescription drugs expenditures has grown a great deal faster than any additional health expenditure.…
Furthermore, some say that the government is already in debt with welfare and military expenses. However they are in debt with welfare because of all the corruption done in the home health clinics. Recent studies have shown that most of the accidents leading to government sending them money have be false closing down hundreds of home health across the US exactly an option to better your life but without the proper help/tools it’s very hard especially for the people who have no family to depend or they are single mother with larger family or etc. Some of us have it easy that why there is some people that say that government shouldn't provide gas money, however think some people barely have money to eat or to pay rent. You don’t want to live like that for ever, you work in a job that your living paycheck by paycheck you want go to school to better your life but your caught up in paying bills and gas that you can’t pass your classes, therefore causing a…
References: 2011 Federal Poverty Guidlines. (2011, January 21). Retrieved June 8, 2011, from Georgetown University Health Policy Institute, Center for Children and Families: http://ccf.georgetown.edu/index/cms-filesystem-action?file=statistics/federal%20poverty%20guidelines.pdf…
Many parents go through hard times at some point in their life, whether it be the loss of a job, home foreclosure or even divorce, these can cause a financial burden. When a parent loses their job they inevitably lose their health insurance coverage and most don’t know if they qualify for Medicaid. Families may also have inadequate access to health care because of lack of transportation or inconvenient clinic hours. Studies show that most children who are not up to date on their vaccinations where ones living in poverty.…
Propsoing a bag tax can indeed be a good thing. Many of our nation's polution comes from plastic bags. When charging an additional 25 cents for a plastic we can use that money to clean up our world. Enforcing the bag tax wouldn't be a problem, the cashier will add an additional 25 cents to your total for each plastic bag. A bag tax should be imposed upon communities because of the problems plastic bags impose on our enviroment. I support having a 25 cent bad tax. A bag tax is good for three reasons, cleans up our world, makes people accountable, the tax money will be put to better use in our community.…
After doing the exercise of creating a budget for a single mother with two kids who is trying to “make ends meet” on a minimum-wage job, I have come to have so much compassion for those struggling with this dilemma. The odds are highly against a poor woman trying to do her best raising her children on a low-income job, some might even say that it would be impossible to do alone. The hurdles of expensive daycare, the rising cost of housing, the low-availability of welfare for women already working, the demanding natures of jobs which don’t allow for paid medical leave, and the skyrocketing costs of health care, all contribute to the poverty of single mothers. While I was taking a deeper look into this problem, it became abundantly clear to me that this is definitely a big “public issue” that needs to be addressed from a social policy standpoint.…
Core Studies 3 Casilda Adames Take-Home Exam November 16, 1999 The ruling ideology dealing with welfare is a negative view among the majority of Americans. It states that welfare recipients are lazy people who have lots of children and collect checks for a long period of time. This statement is believed mostly among higher-class people because they feel that if they can work hard for their money, welfare recipients can do the same, and not live off other people's money. Charles Murray supports the statement "welfare policies encourage poor women to have more children" in one of his books, but is proven wrong by careful studies and demographics. It has been studied that welfare has almost no effect on bearing children. These studies show that younger women are more likely to be poor and their poverty makes their children poor. American adults by far are more unequal in wealth and income than any other industrial society as well as the declining incomes of young men since the mid-1970s. Many young men cannot afford to keep their children out of poverty or decide not to the handle the duties or responsibilities of marriage, leaving young mothers and children even poorer, leading them to depend on welfare. According to a New York Times article dated 2/29/92, there are fewer children receiving assistance from welfare and are not just being lazy but and collecting checks, but actually getting off welfare. This ruling ideology that most of the American society supports leads to the lack of wide political support and budget-cutting of means-tested programs. These mean-tested programs are available only to those people who can prove that they are poor. Only Social Security and Medicare, both Universal programs, have largely survived cutbacks in recent years because it is widely accepted throughout the American society. The reason it is accepted in the American society is that everybody contributes to social security and…
Spending for health care uses a greater part of the economies revenue: the national studies that have been done in the past decade depict that many citizens of the United States will have to make increasingly more disconcerting decisions in daily life and ability to obtain and afford adequate health care insurance for themselves and their families. While there may be future opportunities to constrain those increasingly difficult choices there may be ways to decrease those problematic and health related choices.…
This shift can be seen in the TANF’s restrictions that encourage people to find jobs as well as another outcome of the 1996 tax reform, the Earned Income Tax Credit (EITC). The EITC provides sizable tax refunds for low income workers. While this program is decidedly beneficially to the working poor, the unemployed cannot benefit from it (Edin, Shaefer 2015: 8). The end of the AFDC combined with the implementation of the TANF and EITC has led to the “unintended consequence” of the rise of extreme poverty (Edin, Shaefer 2015: 158). It turns out that by focusing almost solely on the working poor while making the welfare reforms in 1996, the poorest of the poor, families making less than $2 a day per person, suffered the most. The number of American families surviving on an income of $2 a day has been increasing since 1996, and the cause of this increase can be directly related to the fact that the AFDC “was no longer catching families when they fell” (Edin, Shaefer 2015:…
Despite having the largest economy in the entire world according to GDP, the U.S. shamefully owns the second highest poverty rate among the 35 industrialized nations that were examined in a research conducted by UNICEF (Adamson, 2012). There are multiple countries with fewer resources than the U.S. that have lower child poverty rates such as Hungary, New Zealand, Czech Republic, and the U.K. The extreme distinction between our economy health and child poverty rate is unacceptable and should be a bigger concern for our lawmakers. Child poverty reaps children of their future and greatly hinders their opportunity to succeed in life.…
“More than 16 million children in the United States – 22% of all children – live in families with incomes below the federal poverty level – $23,550 a year for a family of four. Research shows that, on average, families need an income of about twice that level to cover basic expenses. Using this standard, 45% of children live in low-income families” (“NCCP – Child Poverty”). With these alarming statistics it should be no question as to whether if one is living in poverty should one be having children. The importance of proper child rearing is essential to child development. In the novel, Hand to Mouth by Linda Tirado, having children while in poverty is one of the topics addressed. Although Tirado attempts to justify someone having a child while…