Rick Kenyon went to the Salvation Army one day and purchased a painting by Bill Gollings for twenty-five dollars. The painting was valued between eight thousand and fifteen thousand dollars. After returning to his home in Idaho he discovered that the painting didn’t come with he and his wife to Idaho. Abel …show more content…
Kenyon claims he purchased the painting in good faith. While Kenyon did legally purchase the painting from the Salvation Army, he is not the rightful owner. According to the text the painting is lost. Lost property is when the owner of the property “unintentionally parted with the possession,” because he had not intentionally left it behind Abel still owns the painting. While Kenyon did technically “find” the painting the rights of finders are “superior o everyone except the owner.” Also according to the text because Abel is the original owner he has the right to “retain ownership” and “has the right to the return of the property.” So therefore the painting should be returned to Abel and the Salvation Army should refund Kenyon the twenty-five dollars he spent on the