Top-Rated Free Essay
Preview

Same Sex Marriage

Powerful Essays
1467 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Same Sex Marriage
Love Should Be Treated Equal Between Two People It is difficult to explain why it is that people of the same sex should be able to marry. It is more difficult to explain this to the die hard believers of the idea that the sanctity of marriage should be between a man and a woman. Our country was founded around the basic freedoms that should be extended to all people no matter race, nationality, gender or sexual orientation. If we argue the matter of law, “The Supreme Court has declared that marriage is a basic civil right, older than the Constitution itself. When civil rights are at stake there is no such thing as deserving them; they are intrinsic to our very way of life” (Gannon. par 1). Since marriage is a civil right then it should be extended to all, no matter the circumstance, anything other than that is discrimination. There are many reasons that we, as Americans, can argue that marriage should only be between a man and woman; however, in doing research on this subject one would find that there are also many reasons that people should be able to marry who they love. The Bible states that homosexuality is an abomination, a sin in the eyes of God, but there are many other sins far worse. History shows that marriage is for procreation and since same sex couples cannot repopulate then there is no point in the union. “Marriage, however, is no longer (if it ever was) primarily for the conception and raising of children. It is all about the closeness and companionship of two people” (Gannon. par 6). I choose now to look for the reasons that people say same-sex marriage should not be allowed and show you why these are weak arguments when held against all that we as Americans hold dear. One argument from people that oppose same-sex marriage is that they are not discriminating against gay people because they don’t have the ingrained right to marry. Marriage should be an institution of one man and one woman and all others would be a danger to society at large. Recognizing same-sex marriage would mean redefining the legal right of marriage (Dailey. par 2). This argument has many flaws since discrimination occurs when someone is denied an advantage or opportunity under prejudice. Throughout history marriage has been recorded to be between one man and one woman; however, “once upon a time, not so long ago, marriage was considered a contract between two men [...] women were treated as property, and their consent was not required for marriage to be legal” (Gannon. par 9). Gay rights are the same thing as civil rights. Civil rights are positive legal entitlements for all people in the United States. It is the right of equal treatment for all. There are no people in America that should not have these rights extended to them. This would mean that “Gay Rights” are not special rights, they are freedom, the universal right of all citizens. (Bond. par 27). One even may argue that since civil rights have been fought for by so many, it would make them more precious than anything. Discrimination occurs when one says, “you are not like me and therefore you do not have the right to enjoy the things that I do.” Marriage is a civil right and should be treated as just that. Those who use the tactic of religion will argue that the Bible states that it is a sin, or even go as far as to call it an abomination in the eyes of God. “Because homosexuality is a sin, we should not encourage homosexual relationships by recognizing their unions” (Sullivan. par 6). In the Bible it does in fact state that homosexuality is a sin, so for the God-fearing Christian it would be their duty to stop such sinful and abominable acts. In theory this is a good argument; however, there are flaws in the argument itself. Although the Bible does state that homosexuality is a sin, there are sins equally bad if not worse and also called abominations. Within these sins are adultery and murder, which in itself are far worst than homosexuality. Neither of these abominations are used to restrict marriage (Gannon. par 3). If a murderer can marry from a prison cell then a homosexual should be able to marry the person that they are in love with. They have never broken a law that is punishable by death. Furthermore if a person who has already proven they are incapable of being faithful to a spouse can remarry then it should not be a problem for a same-sex couple to marry. There is not one state in our great Nation that requires a religious service to be married, this is a civil affair. As much as people may want to believe that their religion should have something do with the laws of our country, all religions are not the same, which is why the separation of church and state is in place. One more common argument for the ban of same-sex marriage is that marriage is for procreation. It is said that, “Marriage is the foundation of our society, insofar as it involves the getting and rearing of the next generation” (Gannon. par 9). The argument also goes on to state that a two parent, opposite sex, household is more stable than that of a same-sex couple. Hearing this it may sound understandable and even logical at first. As previously stated, marriage is no longer mainly established for the concept of having and raising children. Many opposite sex couples today do not want to have children, even though they are biologically capable and they are still allowed to marry. The Supreme Court has ruled that couples have the right to decide when and if they want to have children at all. It is not the right of the state to tell them that they have to. Furthermore the argument that a two parent, opposite sex, household is a better environment to raise children in is very misleading. In theory the idea that a mom and a dad raise happy kids sounds great, but in reality, this still does not guarantee happiness in childhood. Nor does it mean that the child will be safe. No man or woman in this country has ever had to obtain a license proving that they can be a fit parent. That being said, this argument does not succeed in its goal to persuade (Baird, Rosenbaum 194). Marriage is a civil right. There must come a day when the old ways of the world with all of its judgement against the homosexual community and their right to marry ends. In researching this topic many will find that homosexual rights are just as important as the rights that the black community fought for in the 60’s. It is incumbent on us as Americans, to realize that not letting same-sex couples marry is discrimination (Bond. par 7). Love is a right that all people should have. The ability to commit to one person because of love is the right of all people, and no person has the right to take that away. It is hard to be different in a society of old ways and thoughts. The belief that God does not love those who are homosexual is not a pleasant one. If God did not want this to take place then homosexual men and women would not be on this earth. They are here and have the ability and right to love who they want to. All of this boils down to one question. Are they hurting you? No, no-one is hurt by same-sex marriage so there is no reason to take away the rights and privileges that should be afforded to the homosexual community. Works Cited
Baird, Robert, Stuart E. Rosenbaum Same Sex Marriage The Moral and Legal Debate. New York: Prothemus Books 1997

Bond, Julian. "Opposing Same-Sex Marriage Discriminates Against Gays." Opposing Viewpoints: Discrimination. Ed. Jacqueline Langwith. Detroit: Greenhaven Press, 2007. Opposing Viewpoints Resource Center. Gale. Mesa Community College. 19 Apr. 2009
[pic]
Dailey, Timothy J. "Opposing Same-Sex Marriage Does Not Discriminate Against Gays." Opposing Viewpoints: Discrimination. Ed. Jacqueline Langwith. De troit: Greenhaven Press, 2007. Opposing Viewpoints Resource Center. Gale. Mesa Community College. 19 Apr. 2009

Gannon, Heather Ann. "Same-Sex Marriage Should Be Allowed." Opposing View points: Family. Ed. Karen Miller. Detroit: Greenhaven Press, 2008. Opposing Viewpoints Resource Center. Gale. Mesa Community College. 19 Apr. 2009

Sullivan, Andrew. "Legalizing Same-Sex Marriage Would Strengthen Marriage." Opposing Viewpoints: The Family. Ed. Auriana Ojeda. San Diego: Green haven Press, 2003. Opposing Viewpoints Resource Center. Gale. Mesa Community College. 19 Apr. 2009.

Cited: Baird, Robert, Stuart E. Rosenbaum Same Sex Marriage The Moral and Legal Debate. New York: Prothemus Books 1997 Bond, Julian. "Opposing Same-Sex Marriage Discriminates Against Gays." Opposing Viewpoints: Discrimination. Ed. Jacqueline Langwith. Detroit: Greenhaven Press, 2007. Opposing Viewpoints Resource Center. Gale. Mesa Community College. 19 Apr. 2009 [pic] Dailey, Timothy J. "Opposing Same-Sex Marriage Does Not Discriminate Against Gays." Opposing Viewpoints: Discrimination. Ed. Jacqueline Langwith. De troit: Greenhaven Press, 2007. Opposing Viewpoints Resource Center. Gale. Mesa Community College. 19 Apr. 2009 Gannon, Heather Ann. "Same-Sex Marriage Should Be Allowed." Opposing View points: Family. Ed. Karen Miller. Detroit: Greenhaven Press, 2008. Opposing Viewpoints Resource Center. Gale. Mesa Community College. 19 Apr. 2009 Sullivan, Andrew. "Legalizing Same-Sex Marriage Would Strengthen Marriage." Opposing Viewpoints: The Family. Ed. Auriana Ojeda. San Diego: Green haven Press, 2003. Opposing Viewpoints Resource Center. Gale. Mesa Community College. 19 Apr. 2009.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    jennifer t

    • 829 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Everybody should have the right to a legally recognized union with a partner of their choice. The debate over whether or not people in same sex relationship should be allowed to marry, or even enter into civil unions is no new fight. Legalizing gay marriage has brought a new trend which then providing the arguments on supporting gay marriage such as denying them is a violation of religious freedom and minority discrimination encourages people to have strong family values and constitute a good based family as well as giving up high-risk sexual lifestyles. Homosexuality is an accepted lifestyle nowadays with most evidence proving biological causation, and marriage benefits should be available to all couples.…

    • 829 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Same Sex Marriage

    • 674 Words
    • 3 Pages

    There have been several questions that have caused controversial issues for the government. One of these questions is, Can the government regulate who can and cannot marry? This is an important question relating to same-sex marriages. I believe that the government cannot regulate who can and cannot marry.…

    • 674 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Those are marriages are strictly between a man and a woman and marriage is a privilege, not a right. In bible it is often quotes that marriage is a union between a man and a woman. So in the case of Baker v. Nelson, the Supreme Court of Minnesota found that “the institution of marriage as a union of man and woman, uniquely involving the procreation and rearing of children within an family is as old as the book of Genesis” (Gay Marriage - ProCon.org). So two couple of the same sex getting married is contradictory to that belief. Many Christian believers believe that it is morally wrong to allow same-sex marriage. These can be attributed to religious texts. Oppose group of marriage equality believe that marriage is a privilege and not a right. The classes that are protect under the Civil Rights Act of 1964 include “(1) a history of longstanding, widespread discrimination, (2) economic disadvantage, and (3) immutable characteristics… ‘Sexual Orientation’ does not meet any of the three objective criteria shared by the historically protected civil rights categories” (Gay Mariage – ProCon.org). Same-sex marriage contradicts nature. Two people of the same sex will never be able to marry because it is biologically…

    • 1400 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    There are many arguments against same-sex marriage. “We have to protect traditional marriage.” “It is unnatural.” “What about the effects on the children they raise?” These arguments are not very strong. There is nothing wrong with same-sex marriage, and it is not a threat to society.…

    • 402 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Same Sex Marriage

    • 1185 Words
    • 5 Pages

    "Marriage is a coming together for better or for worse, hopefully enduring, and intimate to the degree of being sacred. It is an association that promotes a way of life, not causes; a harmony in living, not political faiths; a bilateral loyalty, not commercial or social projects.” (U.S. Supreme Court). Marriage has been defined as a religious & legal commitment between a man and woman, as well as an expression of love. Homosexuals have not been allowed to partake in these commitments and the rising support for same sex marriage is becoming more of an issue for the government and voters. There are those that are against same sex marriage, who believe that marriage should be strictly between a man and a woman (Barber), and then there are those who believe that it is up to the individual on whom they want to marry (Quindlen). Despite the complexities surrounding the issue of gay marriage and the expansive argument on either side authors Anna Quindlen and La Shawn Barber present extremely simplistic yet opposing views on same sex marriage.…

    • 1185 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    “Marriage is one of the basic building blocks of our neighborhoods and our nation,” states Theodore B. Olson in “The Conservative Case for Gay Marriage”. If this is true then why is it so important to some individuals that couples of the same sex should not be able to spend their lives happily together in marriage? Why is accepted that two people of the opposite sex can get married? What’s the difference? The simple fact is that there is no difference and there should be no laws restricting gays and lesbians from getting married. Gay marriage should be legal for several reasons.…

    • 553 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Gay Marriage

    • 891 Words
    • 4 Pages

    At a time where a procedural republic is present, gay marriage is an issue that does not satisfy the ideal of liberty as self-choosing and unencumbered. However, this concern has become one of the most controversial subjects today because it violates the first amendment, which is the right of the people to peaceably assemble. How are homosexuals supposed to assemble for their cause if they are threatened with violence? Homosexuality is the real problem in the eyes of many and anything relating to this topic is immediately cast down. Because homosexuals are a minority, their rights cannot be advocated because their lifestyle is not part of the dominant culture. The government is supposed to bracket morality issues and remain objective on topics like gay marriage, but for some reason this is not happening. Administrations are able to get away with using their religious and moral backgrounds to set certain laws in place, remaining unjust. The issue of gay marriage is not homosexuality in itself but an individual 's right to choose whom they want to marry.…

    • 891 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Unequal Rights in Marriage

    • 1907 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Many believe that a same-sex marriage is wrong because the couple can’t reproduce children (Waldman, A Common Missed Conception: Why religous people are against gay marriage ). Gay couples need equal rights in marriage to be able to raise children in a family environment. Having equal rights in marriage will give gay couples the validity and recognition of being a…

    • 1907 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Many people feel that marriage is an institution between one man and one woman. Well, that's the most often heard argument, one even codified in a recently passed U.S. federal law. Yet it is easily the weakest. It seems to me that if the straight community cannot show a compelling reason to deny the institution of marriage to gay people, it shouldn't be denied. And such simple, nebulous declarations are hardly a compelling reason. They're really more like an expression of prejudice than any kind of a real argument. The concept of not denying people their rights unless you can show a compelling reason to do so is the very basis of the American ideal of human rights.…

    • 611 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Gay Marriage

    • 1462 Words
    • 6 Pages

    One of the primary reasons that the United States has become the most successful country in the world is because of how strong the family situation is and has been since the onset of our founding fathers. What people over look about the idea of gay marriage is the actual purpose and definition of marriage itself. The entire purpose of marriage is to procreate. Men and women are supposed to have children, raise a family while instilling moral values, and at the same time contribute to society and further their own wellbeing. Marriage as an institution was created to help make it possible for men and women to juggle all of the tasks demanded by society and the human race as a whole. If one of the primary points for married couples is to procreate, then how can we give the right of marriage to homosexuals who cannot…

    • 1462 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Anti-Gay Marriage

    • 624 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Same sex marriage is considered a "slippery slope" that could potentially lead to other things such as incest, polygamy, and bestiality. The original purpose of marriage was to procreate. Since homosexuals can't have children, they are only doing it for their own gratification. It also promotes the gay lifestyle which studies show leads to a lower life expectancy, psychological problems, and other problems.…

    • 624 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    same-sex marriage

    • 8008 Words
    • 26 Pages

    EDITORS NOTE: In lieu of the Champion’s weekly “From the Desk” article, we present a debate on the topic of same-sex marriage. Along with the recent Supreme Court deliberation of the Defense of Marriage Act has come credible arguments from both sides. Though both of this article’s contributors are members of the Champion staff, the views presented are solely their own and do not reflect the official viewpoint of the newspaper or Liberty University itself.…

    • 8008 Words
    • 26 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Definiton of Marriage

    • 536 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Cited: Chittom, Lynn-nore and Finley, Laura. “Same-Sex Marriage Undermines Society and Families.” Point of view, Same-sex marriage, 2011, p 2-2, 1p, unknown publisher. Point of view, February 2nd 2013.…

    • 536 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Love Has No Gender

    • 735 Words
    • 3 Pages

    For many years gays and lesbians have been discriminated and judged based on the fact that they are attracted to people of their own sex. This hatred for gays and lesbians is still very much alive today, many are murdered both young and old, some are denied jobs because of their sexual preference, well all are denied the one thing that many people have already for written in their life goals. What life goal am I talking about, marriage. Yes there are a few states in the US that permit gay marriage, but why shouldn’t gays and lesbians be permitted to married wherever they choose. I myself am arguing for same-sex marriages to be legalized, my primarily reason for arguing for same-sex marriage is that love has no gender.…

    • 735 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The debate on gay marriage is an ongoing argument in the United States. Andrew Sullivan and William J. Bennett are two people who wrote on the topic. Sullivan, an advocate of gay marriage, was the first to write a national cover story in favor of equal marriage in 1989. Sullivan published his book “Virtually Normal: An Argument about Homosexuality” in 1995. In 1996, Bennett responds to Sullivan’s book by writing a rebuttal as an op-ed column in the Washington Post. These two authors show why this debate will continue to happen because of the valid points made on both sides.…

    • 769 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays

Related Topics