Preview

Same Sex Marriage Should Be Legalized

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1290 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Same Sex Marriage Should Be Legalized
Could you imagine if you had met the ideal person you wished to share your entire life with but the law would not allow you to? That is the position that many homosexual Australians have been in since the settlement of this country. Same sex marriage is currently not allowed in Australia but I and a proven 60% of other Australians strongly believe it should be. Gay people pay taxes, serve in the military, participate in the workforce, are our neighbors, friends and family. Logic and decency would suggest that they should have the right to marry, just as any heterosexual couple can. However, there are people who disagree with this belief, take for example the government, namely Australia’s prime minister, Julia Gillard, several religious groups who believe marriage should be kept between a man and a woman and those who simply wish to deny the happiness of two people in love because of their anatomy.
According to new research, Australia’s ban on same sex marriage is bad for the economy and could collect $750 million for the nation. A paper released by the Australian Marriage Equality Group argues that estimate could be brought in by spending on weddings alone. The paper also says that legal discrimination against gay and lesbian people has been shown to have an adverse and costly impact on mental and physical health. Allowing same sex marriage would also boost the economy through expenditure on weddings and an increase in overseas visitors coming to Australia to marry or to honeymoon will have a positive effect on tourism. So what reason could Julia Gillard possibly have for personally opposing same-sex marriages? She is in a serious relationship so it can’t be because she opposes recognizing different types of relationships. She is the first female leader of Australia, so it can’t be because she believes that discrimination in the past justifies discrimination in the future. She is an atheist, so it can’t be because she believes God ordained marriage as a holy

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    Due to the long-awaited family law reforms signifying the recognition of same sex relationships, one may say, “society moves ahead and the law limps behind.” It was in the 1969 that the ACT Homosexual Law Reform Society was formed, indicating society’s demand for equality. Such demands were first recognised by the Property (Relationships) Legislation Amendment Act 1999 (NSW), which enabled access to the District Court for property divisions and financial maintenance orders, and granted inheritance rights to same-sex de-factos. Finally, after 2 decades of Gay and Lesbian Mardi Gras marches, The Commonwealth government passed the Family Law Amendment (De Facto Financial Matters and Other Measures) Act 2008. The legislation expanded the definition of de-facto relationships to include, “2 persons of the same sex.” This, amongst other amendments, ensured that same-sex couples are afforded the same rights and obligations as heterosexual couples, under around 50 Commonwealth statutes.…

    • 1100 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Best Essays

    As society has revolutionized and with democratic ideology denominating has the western world, liberation and equality campaigns stemming from “third sector” (Keane 1998) lobbying groups, stand as a key component to the operation a “civil society”(Keane 1998). Carrying an objective to influence legislators or regulatory agencies, these political advocacy groups play a critical role in the operation of a healthy liberal democracy. In contemporary society, the notion of Same-sex marriage has polarized public opinion worldwide and is recognized as one of the most controversial non-economic issues to ever confront the Australian parliament. The contentious issue provides a modern 21st century example of “civil-governmental cooperation” (Keane 1998), comparable to 1960 libertarian movements against racism and sexism. Ones right to the institution of marriage is the key distinction between the treatment of heterosexual and same-sex relationships in Australia, and forms the foundations upon which the highly contentious issue is contested. ‘Australian Marriage Equality’ is an activism group partnered with a myriad of pro same-sex marriage organizations around Australia, who collectively fight to end the evident disparity in entitlements between heterosexual couples and same-sex partners. Founded in 2004, the lobbying group was established preceding the Federal Parliament’s amending of the ‘Marriage Act 1961’, which ultimately prohibited lawful recognition of same-sex partners. Opposing the concept of Same-sex marriage is the politically active ‘Australian Christian Lobby’. Publicly condemning the notion of same-sex marriage in the public sphere, the influential group raises moral and religious concerns and assertively promotes the damaging social consequences associated with the potential legalization of same-sex marriage. Both these well-established lobbying…

    • 1974 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The issue of whether or not gay marriage should be accepted in Australia has been largely debated in politics and among the general public for a while now, and it seems as though it will remain a continuous issue for some time to come. The majority of Australians are currently split over whether the traditional view of marriage being solely between a man and a woman should be preserved, or whether this view of marriage is out-dated and should be redefined in order to allow gays the right to marry. The Australian Labor Party was also divided on this issue at a recently held federal conference. In the opinion piece “Welcome, gays, to… what?” (published in the Herald Sun in December 2011), Wendy Tuohy contends in a supportive tone, that gay marriage should be allowed in Australia, and in a more inquisitive and somewhat deflated tone goes on to question the meaning and necessity of marriage in today’s world. Similarly, Michael Newton believes that our laws should reflect on the new sets of values which are present in the modern world. In his letter to the editor titled “It is nonsense to cling to the past” (published in The Age on the 16th of November 2011), he presents a reasoned point of view, that although marriage has had a certain meaning in the past, to assume that it should stay that way would be completely irrational. A contrasting viewpoint is presented in the opinion piece “Tsunami-sized backlash on same-sex marriage looms” (published in The Australian on the 12th of December 2011), in which Barry Cohen attacks “the pro-gay marriage brigade”, expressing his traditionalist views and stark rejection of same-sex marriage in a very deprecating and slightly satirical tone. A cartoonist named Spooner drew a cartoon (published in The Age on the 22nd of November 2011) which presents two clashing views of the issue. A non-Christian audience would derive a message in support of giving gays the right to marry, whilst a religious audience may see the opposite.…

    • 1904 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Adoption for same-sex couples has been available since 2010 in NSW. Australia’s first legal gay adoption took place in western Australia June 2007 but the federal government under Prime Minister John Howard moved to pass a legislation not to recognise adoptions taken place overseas by same-sex couples. The Adoption Act 2000 provided equality in adoption in same-sex adoption stating “Two persons who are a couple may, subject to this Act adopt a child’. However the legislation has not stopped discrimination The Australian Christian Lobby, formed in 1995, and the Catholic Australian Family Association, formed in 1980, strongly opposes same-sex rights such as adoption and marriage. It is through their influences that the struggle to protect the rights of same-sex couples and provide the couples equality before the law being hindered. The Legal system’s approach to protecting the rights of same sex couples have been effective in regards to adoption although there are yet areas to reform to better serve societies…

    • 689 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Jeff Jordan Parity Thesis

    • 476 Words
    • 2 Pages

    In regards to everyone’s well-being, people should be able to do whatever they choose, as long as it does not bring harm to others. Respecting personal choices of others can be harmless because it cannot exactly harm anyone outside of that relationship. As a social norm, marriage is composed of and supports several aspects of life. It seems Marriage can exist without aspects of sexual relations, friendship and companionship, love, and responsibilities. Marriage is a civil, religious and expressive aspect; it is a symbolic institution. Public debates about same sex marriage develops questions in forms of religion, which finds same sex marriages unacceptable but take this matter internally. In a civil aspect, married people get a lot of government benefits which can occur as a conflict in rights as some people may agree to fairness than those who…

    • 476 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    A very big topic that lingers on the hearts and minds of so many Americans today, on the desks of so many politicians and in so many courtrooms around the country today is gay marriage. There are two very identifiable sides to this debate and both sides have very defendable points of view, which are constantly being publically expressed by radicals and extremist from both sides of the spectrum. My point of views differ from those who believe that gay marriage should remain illegal however, I am going to look at both sides of this huge debate and argue the point that homosexuals should be granted the right to marry whomever they please because it is not only unconstitutional, but unjust and logically improper to forfeit to this group of people the same, equal rights to marriage as heterosexuals simply because of their sexual orientation.…

    • 1566 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Family LAw

    • 2126 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The legal recognition of same-sex relationships in Australia has evolved dramatically since the 1980s to a point where most jurisdictions provide same-sex couples with the same rights and obligations as heterosexual de-facto couples. The recognition of homosexual peoples was first reflected in 1982 through the insertion of Part 4C into the Anti-Discrimination Act (NSW). At the federal level, the 1984 Federal Sex-Discrimination Act (Cth) was enacted. Demographically, Australia is continuously developing into a more secular society, resulting in the waning influence of the Christian Church on the political front. Nevertheless, the 2004 Amendment to the 1961 Federal Marriage Act, which defined marriage as the legal union between a man and a woman”, was described by many as “enshrining the institution of marriage”, and is only reflective of the views held by the more conservative and religious members of society. To this day, the legal definition of marriage remains unreflective of society’s progressive views, resulting in the law languishing behind.…

    • 2126 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Law Reform- My Report

    • 568 Words
    • 3 Pages

    * the case-waiting for the big day-in six years, Michele and Lisa Saffery held onto their dream that one day they could legally marry in Australia. The women from Wagga Wagga and their two children, Gemme 6 and Jordae 5 carried a huge rainbow flag during 8000-strong gay marriage rights march the Labor party National conference in Sydney. Along with many others, the couple decided to have the same surname despite not being married, were disappointed with the conscience vote approved at the conference. ''I have to say to Julia Gillard, 'Damn you!''' Michele said. ''All Labor MPs should be voting 'yes' on this issue. The conscience vote is just a cop-out for Julia.'' An observant Jew, mr.whitmont-stein dismissed arguments that allowing same sex marriage was an attack on religion. “the whole point of marriage is equality, it’s not about religious institutions”, he said. Lisa Saffert and Michele are Australian but also hold British passports but they insist on marrying in Australia…

    • 568 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Marriage Act 1961

    • 992 Words
    • 4 Pages

    According to a census provided by the Australian Bureau of Statistics, the number of same sex couples has risen drastically between the years 2006 and 2011 with a 32% increase. (Australian Bureau of Statistics, 2011) This law has a detrimental impact on the homosexual demographic because through no fault of their own, they are incapable of fulfilling all required criteria to marry. It can be argued that their love is the same, their union is the same and yet they are not afforded the same legal right to marry, again a fact that seems considerably outdated and not aligned with the modern society we live in…

    • 992 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Gay marriage should be legalised in Australia because everyone should have the same rights as other people, all should be equal. Equality is all about everyone having the same rights and freedom. In Today society if gay marriage is legalised, it would lead to gay’s having the same equal rights and freedom as a married couple. If gay marriage is legalised then there will be more kids adopted which means more kids will be loved. Some people believe that gay marriage should not be allowed, as the main reason is that the sacrament of marriage is between a man and a woman, not the same sexes. I strongly disagree with this viewpoint, as every human being should be able to have the right and freedom to marry any one they choose, although some people…

    • 136 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Critical Thinking

    • 1500 Words
    • 6 Pages

    In the United States, there is social unrest regarding the government’s denial of the right to marry for homosexuals. Plenty of conservatives are completely against gay marriage; and many of liberals are fighting for equal treatment. The neo-Christian politicians are using religious arguments to establish that homosexuality is an abomination. Clearly we as a nation are undecided on this issue. 36 states have passed legislation banning gay marriages, yet the state of Vermont passed a law that allows homosexual couples the right to participate in civil unions. Some other states are also debating whether or not to allow these couples to marry. Unfortunately, the dispute has left the United States homosexual community in an awkward position. Gays who gain the same benefits from marriage would be a more productive part of society for two reasons: the benefits from marriage and the pursuit of happiness obtained from the right of gay marriage. Many gays disagree with the argument that marriage is a tradition. They believe we should not discriminate who may be married. It is clear where gays stand. They do not want to settle for less than marriage status.…

    • 1500 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Marriage is the formal union of a man and a woman, typically recognized by law, by which they become husband and wife. However, in an article “Gay Marriages: Make Them Legal” by Thomas B. Stoddard is talking about the marriage of gays and the author try to argue for gay marriages. Just only reading title, we can see how strong of this argument, because Stoddard have showed us many evidences that can support his point of view.…

    • 417 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    “Marriage is one of the basic building blocks of our neighborhoods and our nation,” states Theodore B. Olson in “The Conservative Case for Gay Marriage”. If this is true then why is it so important to some individuals that couples of the same sex should not be able to spend their lives happily together in marriage? Why is accepted that two people of the opposite sex can get married? What’s the difference? The simple fact is that there is no difference and there should be no laws restricting gays and lesbians from getting married. Gay marriage should be legal for several reasons.…

    • 553 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Gay Marriage

    • 1101 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The issue of gay marriage has been a long-standing issue that has plagued our society worldwide. With the same fire as ethnic equality issues brought during the civil rights movement, gay marriage has brought similar attitudes our of current generations. Opponents of gay marriage claim that it would destroy the foundation and meaning of traditional marriage and family and that it would lead to polygamy and a growth in sexually transmitted disease. I believe that gay marriage is a right that should be afforded to all individuals, as it would help the local and state governments, change traditional family values for the better, and for the mere fact that it is a right protected and often overlooked by the constitution.…

    • 1101 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    prominent issue as you can see in books, on television, in the media, and as we have…

    • 1252 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays

Related Topics