Preview

Sample Case Analysis Question: Cola Wars Case

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
703 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Sample Case Analysis Question: Cola Wars Case
Question: Why is the concentrate manufacturing industry so profitable? Explain using a
Porter’s Five-Forces Analysis, where you describe what makes each force strong or weak
(explain at least two factors per force). Pay particular attention to the force of “Rivalry,” that is, the nature of competition between the two industry leaders as well as the history of their competition. Answer: Overall, the concentrate manufacturing industry is characterized by high barriers to entry, weak suppliers, weak buyers (and a fragmented final customer base), “smart” rivalry, substitutes that lack many of the attributes of soft drink products, and strong complementors.
These dynamics within the concentrate manufacturing industry have resulted in very high industry profits (gross margins of 83% and a pretax profit margin of 35%, see Exhibit 5).
Specifically, the forces, which affect industry profits, can be described as follows:

Barriers to Entry:

• Brand equity: Coke and Pepsi have established their brand identity over decades, and both brands have become part of the American culture.
• Scale economics of advertising: Not only have Coke and Pepsi built their brands over decades but they also are much more effective at capturing the rewards of their advertising campaigns. For example, Coke spent about $10 million per share point in advertising, whereas 7-Up had to spend $22 million per share point (see Exhibit 2).
• Limited shelf space, vending slots, and fountains: Because there is limited shelf space to sell soft drinks, new products would need to replace existing products. Having to replace existing products is much more costly than being able to use open channels.
• The franchise system: Bottling is very capital-intensive, and the bottlers have exclusive arrangements with Coke and Pepsi for cola products. It costs roughly $6 billion to build national distribution ($75 million * 80 plants, see p. 3).

Supplier Power:

The suppliers to the

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Busa 321

    • 1569 Words
    • 7 Pages

    What is the firm’s profit margin (return on sales)? (Round your answer to 2 decimal places. Omit the "%" sign in your response.)…

    • 1569 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Case Analysis #2

    • 1165 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Secondly, Burns was not able to accept clients’ opinions when they do not agree with him. However, Burn did not consider his stubbornness as a weakness even if he was aware of a fault. In his opinion, if he disagreed with someone, he was free to not agree and give out his thoughts.…

    • 1165 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Fair Value

    • 3876 Words
    • 16 Pages

    | (Exhibit 6: Total Revenue and Cost) The most profitable level of output occurs at quantity:…

    • 3876 Words
    • 16 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Harrod S Sporting Goods

    • 36 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Profit Margin = Net Income / Sales 2007 4.524726859 4.50% Return on Assets = a) Net income ÷ Total assets 6.094252729 6.10% b)(Net income ÷ Sales) x (Sales ÷ Total Assets) 6.094252729 6.10% Return on Equity = a) Net Income/Stockholders Equity…

    • 36 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Coke vs Pepsi

    • 688 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Coke and Pepsi have always been rival beverages for decades. I can remember my teens when most households would divide into two when it came to choosing their choice of drink, especially when going for grocery shopping. Even the advert aired by both brands shows a lot of rivalries between them. When one makes a new product, the other would do everything possible to make something similar or better than the former. Making people, both old and young believe their product is the best. When comparing the two beverages, there’s a major thing we normally notice from their commercials, while Coca-Cola Company uses families and animal in most of their commercial ads relating to peoples society, Pepsi Company uses different super stars and celebrities to sell their product worldwide. However, as coke uses their ethos in targeting both the old and young generation, Pepsi target mostly today’s youth in their adverts.…

    • 688 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Soft drink industry Shares of beverage companies have always been ranked high among other industries. Although, when consumer incomes decrease, sales of beer and soda don't drop that much. Additionally, it is cheap to produce those and drinks are so popular so companies can sell them for a large price. Actually, it is a very unique case, that such a product, which is in the group of basic commodities, is profitable. Both concentrate and bottling businesses are interrelated, because they create one product, but at different stages, they have the same consumers, however, there is a big difference in the structure and most significant is gaining profitability. 5 forces structure of both businesses would help to explain the phenomenon:…

    • 1046 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The competition within the $74 billion carbonated soft drink (CSD) industry has been remarkable ever since Coca-Cola was formulated in 1886, and further intensified when Pepsi was introduced in 1893. Ever since then, the CSD industry has been dominated by these two companies, with Coke taking the lead in the early stage, followed by Pepsi doubled its market share between 1950 and 1970 by offering its concentrate at a lower price than its competitor. The CSD industry has been profitable historically due to numerous reasons. Firstly, in the world’s largest market for CSD products, consumption had been growing at a steady rate of 3% annually from 1970 to 2000 in the U.S., marking a high growth stage in the industry life cycle (Appendix B). This allowed both Coke and Pepsi (C&P) to achieve annual sales growth of around 10%, while competing head-to-head against each other and other smaller CSD producers. Competition between C&P reinforced their brand image, as the increase in marketing efforts could be transferred into profit and sales growth when the overall demand was increasing in a growing industry. However, the increasing industry volume was largely obtained by C&P, leaving other smaller firms vulnerable with stagnated growth opportunity. Secondly, according to Porter’s Five Forces analysis in Appendix A, high barrier for new entrants, low bargaining power of suppliers of both concentrate producers and bottlers, moderate buyer’s bargaining power and low degree of threats of substitutes prior to 2000, have been favorable to the high profitability and growth of the CSD industry. In terms of concentrate producers, the manufacture process involves little fixed costs and capital investments. This ensures high level of gross margin for them and frees up funds for marketing related expenditures. As the industry became more consolidated, large firms such as C&P gained pricing power over bottlers through master price contracts. For bottlers, even though heavy capital…

    • 1227 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Case of Movie Industry

    • 1117 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Those are the major forces that have challenged these industry and these forces have made it more difficult to stand in the market efficiently.…

    • 1117 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    April 13th 1992, PepsiCo introduced an exciting change to its popular Pepsi product in the test cities of Providence, Denver, and Dallas and called it Crystal Pepsi. This is believed by many to have been one of the best ideas that PepsiCo had ever came out with, as they simply removed any and all coloring from Pepsi, creating a healthier and visually stimulating product. During the 1980's, Madison Avenue advertisers created one of our society's most aberrant spectacles yet, the pinnacle of decades of pop culture and advertising prowess, The Cola Wars. In our technological, media-driven, consumer-happy, and product-driven culture, selling and consuming soda has certainly become one of our biggest American pastimes. Coca-Cola and PepsiCo squared off for decades in various advertising coups trying to sell more soda to the already overly indulgent American public. A seemingly easy goal, but these companies have tried everything from using pop-stars, bold and daring challenges and most recently the chance to win a billion dollars on national television just for drinking their products. Throughout the…

    • 1403 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Globus Report

    • 1509 Words
    • 7 Pages

    On this game I also learn from the compotetion btween the company in this industries.Every single company have a different strategies to dominate the industry. All the strategies is depend on the current situation and target market.and the…

    • 1509 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    sales, for a total industry profitability of 14% (Exhibit 1). This industry as a whole generates positive…

    • 3389 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Cola Wars

    • 3319 Words
    • 14 Pages

    Cola Wars Continue: Coke and Pepsi in the Twenty first century, Harvard Business School, (9-702-442), p.1-24.…

    • 3319 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Cola Wars

    • 18130 Words
    • 73 Pages

    For more than a century, Coca-Cola and Pepsi-Cola vied for “throat share” of the world’s beverage market. The most intense battles in the so-called cola wars were fought over the $66 billion carbonated soft drink (CSD) industry in the United States.1 In a “carefully waged competitive struggle” that lasted from 1975 through the mid-1990s, both Coke and Pepsi achieved average annual revenue growth of around 10%, as both U.S. and worldwide CSD consumption rose steadily year after year.2 According to Roger Enrico, former CEO of Pepsi: The warfare must be perceived as a continuing battle without blood. Without Coke, Pepsi would have a tough time being an original and lively competitor. The more successful they are, the sharper we have to be. If the Coca-Cola company didn’t exist, we’d pray for someone to invent them. And on the other side of the fence, I’m sure the folks at Coke would say that nothing contributes as much to the present-day success of the Coca-Cola company than . . . Pepsi.3 That cozy relationship began to fray in the late 1990s, however, as U.S. per-capita CSD consumption declined slightly before reaching what appeared to be a plateau. In 2004, the average American drank a little more than 52 gallons of CSDs per year. At the same time, the two companies experienced their own distinct ups and downs, as Coke suffered several operational setbacks and as Pepsi charted a new, aggressive course in alternative beverages. Although their paths diverged, however, both companies began to modify their bottling, pricing, and brand strategies. As the cola wars continued into the 21st century, Coke and Pepsi faced new challenges: Could they boost flagging domestic CSD sales? Would newly popular beverages provide them with new (and profitable) revenue streams? Was their era of sustained growth and profitability coming to a close, or was this slowdown just another blip in…

    • 18130 Words
    • 73 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Soft drink industry needs huge amount of money to spend on advertisement and marketing. In 2000, Pepsi, Coke and…

    • 2532 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    * The fundamental nature of competition in many of the world’s industries is changing. There are rapid changes in industry boundaries and markets.…

    • 4673 Words
    • 19 Pages
    Powerful Essays