In the article “knights and samurai” a document based investigation it clearly shows how a samurai would win on a one on one battle against the knights. While knights and samurais have many similarities, in a one on one battle, the advantage would be to the samurai and this can be seen in Armor, training, and beliefs.…
The warrior class would rule society and politics in Japan until the Tokugawa Shogunate in the nineteenth century. A samurai was a member of the Japanese elite and his lifestyle was dictated by a series of strict moral codes and ideals. True loyalty to his lord was expected, if not always followed through in its ideal form. In 1703 a vendetta carried out by forty-six former vassals avenging their lord 's death would come to be viewed as the embodiment of samurai ideals. Playwrights and storytellers have used the story of the valiant and devoted retainers many times since, due to the tale 's immense popularity in Japan. What would go on to be called "the most famous and popular work in the entire Japanese…
I think that the Samurai would win in a battle against a knight. While knights ad samurai have many similarities, in a one on one battle, the advantage would be to the Samurai and this can be seen in weapons, training, and their honor code…
Samurai lived by the code of Bushido, which emphasized on the rule that they should respect and honor those above them on the social class. And they should obey all the commanders. On the contrary, the reality is a large percentage of samurai become jobless and homeless at the end of Tokugawa Era. Less of governmental offices can provide them occupations as the long period of peace for 200 years. So without war, the samurai’s role and life style dramatically changed since there was no more…
Knights and Samurai have many similarities. They are different too, because of their culture, and skills. While they have differences and similarities they both would have a chance to win if they were at war. The Knights and Samurai have a 50, 50 chance to win because of their armor, training, and code.…
The first reason why I think the similarities are greater than differences is social position. The reason why I think social position is because; “The life of a samurai was not his own but belonged entirely to his lord, and it was the duty of a (samurai) to consider this at all times….”. [Doc B]This…
Imagine yourself as a Samurai, you are in the middle of defeating the European knights who are covered in plated armor. You begin to worry but then, you win, these are the reasons why a Samurai is better than a knight. Feudalism in Europe and Japan were both very similar. They both has rulers, and they both had rulers who hired nobles, and they both had nobles who hired landowners, and they both had landowners who hired warriors to protect the slaves and their land. If samurai and knights were to have fought against each other the samurai would have won because, they had movable armor and it was easier for them to dodge anything that a knight would slowly lunge at them with. If a Samurai and knights battled the knights would have fallen because, their armor was very defective. A knight's armor wasn’t made for easy movement, this made it more difficult for them to fight, but overall they were well protected(Document B). Their armor did defend them but, a Knight’s armor could easily be penetrated by a soldier…
Samurai were imagined to lead their lives in step with the ethic code of code ("the method of the warrior"). powerfully Confucian in nature, code stressed ideas like loyalty to one's master, self discipline and respectful, moral behavior. several samurai were additionally drawn to the teachings and practices of Zen Buddhism.…
To begin Knights and Samurai have a lot of common traits, but they also have differences. Traits that they both share are, they are warriors who protect their land. But a difference is that they have different weapons,armor,training and different religions. While knights and samurai have many similarities, in a one on one battle, the advantage would be given to the knight and this can be seen in their training,armor,and their Honor Code.…
Have you ever wondered what the similarities and the differences were between the Samurai and knights? Samurai and knights were very strong warriors in the medieval era, they had different cultural ideas, but Samurai and Knight also had similarities. Samurai and Knights were similar, but also different in some areas. The similarities between samurai and knights were greater than the differences. This can be shown by looking at three areas, social position, training and armor, and life, honor, and death.…
Samurai and Knights were different but the similarities were greater because of their rankings, training, armor, fighting technique, code of honor, and death viewpoint. The Japanese called their warriors Samurai, and the Europeans called their warriors Knights. They both swore oaths of loyalty to noble lords and fought to the death to defend them. This happened at the same time even though Japan and Europe were thousands of miles apart.…
In medieval Japan, the relationship between warriors and clan chiefs was very intense. An outcome of this feudal arrangement was a strict code of warrior behavior emerged known as Bushido (way of the warrior), which called upon warrior to sacrifice his life for his master. Such an act was thought of as the highest from of honor and respect. It was during the twelfth century that these warriors became known as samurai, meaning “those who serve.” Although the samurai were mainly soldiers, many excelled in the arts and philosophy. In these pursuits, the samurai normally showed the same type of discipline that characterized their martial…
European and Japanese feudalism were similar in that they had a similar political structure of a hereditary caste system. The Japanese classes were the shogun (similar to a king in Europe), who held all the power. Then the daimyo, who owned the land, (similar to the lords and nobles in Europe), divided their land to the lesser samurais (similar to the European knights), and the same to the peasants, artisans, farmers, and merchants (similar to the serfs in Europe). In both Europe and Japan, the hierarchy was held together as a land-for-loyalty exchange. Both Japanese and European feudalism was based on mutual obligation, but the Japanese problems of internal attacks led to them begin using a feudal system for military aspects, while the Europeans foreign invasions led to them begin using a feudal system to protect and economically grow.…
All in all, samurai and knights have more differences than they do similarities. This includes their armour, views on death, and of course their loyalty to their lords. Although they both had similar loyalty rules, the differences in how they served their lord and others…
Body Paragraph#1: Both the Europeans and the Japanese had successful warriors that helped them succeed. In both feudal Japan and Europe, constant warfare made warriors the most important class. Called the “Knights” in Europe and “Samurai” in Japan, the warriors served their local lords. In both cases, Knight and Samurais were bound by a code of ethics. Knights were supposed to agree to the concept of Chivalry, while the Samurai were bound by the Bushido, or “The way of the warrior.” Both Knight and Samurai rode horses into battles, used swords, and wore armor. The European armor, which was worn by the knights, was usually all metal, made of chain, or plate metal. Japanese…