Preview

Samurai Compare And Contrast Essay

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
477 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Samurai Compare And Contrast Essay
In this 10 paragraph essay , I am going to compare and contrast the ancient japan Nobles and ancient japan Samurai . I am going to tell you how their same and different in many ways. I got my information from World History Medieval to Early Modern Times.

The nobles and samurai had many similarities . One similarities is they are on the social level.Another similarity is that they both practiced Zen . My last similarity is that they both were fighters.

The nobles and samurai had the same social level . They got to tell other social levels what to do. But they both had to listen to the emperor. The last thing they got to do because of their social level was write poems.

In the 1100 a new form of buddhism came . It was called Zen. Because
…show more content…
They had many differences . One difference they had was clothing . Another difference they had was how they lived . My last difference is the samurai worked as warriors and the nobles did not work. The nobles got to wear anything.they loved beauty and cared about their appearance. They love elaborate outfits.They wore long gowns with 12 layers of colored silk , silk robes, gold jewelry, and decorative fans .On the other side samurai had to always wear the same thing . Armorer and special headgear with 2 swords . They wore that because they need to protect their country at all times.

The samurai lived a totally different lives than nobles. They have to work all day . They could not to ceremonies. If people disrespect them they would be killed. The nobles go to do whatever they wanted . They were so free the moved themselves from the rest of japan . They also called their self “dwellers from the cloud”.

My last difference is that Samurai had to work all day. They had to go to wars to defend their country from china . But nobles got o just sit around all day and make orders with the emperor.The samurai did all the work.

In conclusion, the nobles and the samurai were on the same social level but was not equally treated the

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Samurai lived by the code of Bushido, which emphasized on the rule that they should respect and honor those above them on the social class. And they should obey all the commanders. On the contrary, the reality is a large percentage of samurai become jobless and homeless at the end of Tokugawa Era. Less of governmental offices can provide them occupations as the long period of peace for 200 years. So without war, the samurai’s role and life style dramatically changed since there was no more…

    • 657 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Knights and Samurai have many similarities. They are different too, because of their culture, and skills. While they have differences and similarities they both would have a chance to win if they were at war. The Knights and Samurai have a 50, 50 chance to win because of their armor, training, and code.…

    • 594 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The first reason why I think the similarities are greater than differences is social position. The reason why I think social position is because; “The life of a samurai was not his own but belonged entirely to his lord, and it was the duty of a (samurai) to consider this at all times….”. [Doc B]This…

    • 348 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Imagine yourself as a Samurai, you are in the middle of defeating the European knights who are covered in plated armor. You begin to worry but then, you win, these are the reasons why a Samurai is better than a knight. Feudalism in Europe and Japan were both very similar. They both has rulers, and they both had rulers who hired nobles, and they both had nobles who hired landowners, and they both had landowners who hired warriors to protect the slaves and their land. If samurai and knights were to have fought against each other the samurai would have won because, they had movable armor and it was easier for them to dodge anything that a knight would slowly lunge at them with. If a Samurai and knights battled the knights would have fallen because, their armor was very defective. A knight's armor wasn’t made for easy movement, this made it more difficult for them to fight, but overall they were well protected(Document B). Their armor did defend them but, a Knight’s armor could easily be penetrated by a soldier…

    • 635 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The country was eventually reunited within the late 1500s, and a rigid social class structure was established throughout the Edo amount that placed the samurai at the highest, followed by the farmers, artisans and merchants severally. throughout now, the samurai were forced to measure in castle cities, were the sole ones allowed to possess and carry swords and were paid in rice by their daimyo or social structure lords. uncontrolled samurai were referred to as ronin and caused minor troubles throughout the 1600s.…

    • 418 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Knights Dbq

    • 443 Words
    • 2 Pages

    To begin Knights and Samurai have a lot of common traits, but they also have differences. Traits that they both share are, they are warriors who protect their land. But a difference is that they have different weapons,armor,training and different religions. While knights and samurai have many similarities, in a one on one battle, the advantage would be given to the knight and this can be seen in their training,armor,and their Honor Code.…

    • 443 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Samurai Knights Dbq

    • 513 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Social Position: The first area of important similarities was social position. They have a comparison of both of their lords, lesser lords, kings, both military, classes and peasants. These similarities are significant because both Samurai and knights showed great loyalty to their lords.The samurai warriors who owed loyalty and military service to daimyos for land or regular payment. According to Document A: Social Pyramids, with families the Samurai’s made up to 10%of Japan's…

    • 513 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Samurai and Knights were different but the similarities were greater because of their rankings, training, armor, fighting technique, code of honor, and death viewpoint. The Japanese called their warriors Samurai, and the Europeans called their warriors Knights. They both swore oaths of loyalty to noble lords and fought to the death to defend them. This happened at the same time even though Japan and Europe were thousands of miles apart.…

    • 455 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    All woman out there if you want to protect yourself and not rely on a man then you should become a samurai but if you want protection and respect then marry a knight. During the Middle Ages in Feudal Japan and in Europe samurai and knights were two of the bravest warriors. It is important to compare these two because you can see who is more respectful or more powerful. Samurai were sent to defeat barbarians in Northern Honshu. Samurai worked for landowners and offered them protection and loyalty in exchange for land and rights. Knights lived in their lord's castle because they protected their lord. They lived in the lower floor of the castle with other knights because there was enough space there. In this essay I will compare the views on women of samurai and knights, the views on education of both warriors, and their code of conduct.…

    • 710 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    European and Japanese feudalism were similar in that they had a similar political structure of a hereditary caste system. The Japanese classes were the shogun (similar to a king in Europe), who held all the power. Then the daimyo, who owned the land, (similar to the lords and nobles in Europe), divided their land to the lesser samurais (similar to the European knights), and the same to the peasants, artisans, farmers, and merchants (similar to the serfs in Europe). In both Europe and Japan, the hierarchy was held together as a land-for-loyalty exchange. Both Japanese and European feudalism was based on mutual obligation, but the Japanese problems of internal attacks led to them begin using a feudal system for military aspects, while the Europeans foreign invasions led to them begin using a feudal system to protect and economically grow.…

    • 566 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    During the medieval ages, from fifth to fifteenth centuries, a kind of military service grew in Europe and Japan. Both of these warriors fought for their lord and swore loyalty to them, but they were both very different in many ways, one example is their names. The samurai from Japan and the knights from Europe. These warriors were more different because of their armour design, views on death, and hereditary loyalty to their lords.…

    • 823 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    One political difference is their political structures. Both depended on bonds of personal loyalty and had cases of traitors and traitorous betrayals. The lords of Europe were at the top of the class and controlled the peasants. This lord-vassal relationship was seen as mutual and contractual. It was also ultimate and absolute loyalty on behalf of the vassal. This relationship was legalistic, meaning they followed a set of laws. In Japan there was more emphasis on morality than law. They did not have the same set laws that the Europeans did There was not as much room for a concept of political rights. The Japanese saw the importance of lineage and honor in determining power and prestige and securing ownership of property. The Japanese avoided the hereditary…

    • 460 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Tokugawa era Japan was a very different period than those before it, instead of proving loyalty and honor on the battlefield it was drawn from more diplomatic situations. The Tokugawa period brought with it an era of lasting peace for nearly 250 years, and with it came different ways in which to occupy ones self. Many things in society changed including, the warring ways of the samurai where honor was drawn from the strength and skill turned into peaceful times when martial skill was practiced to maintain. However, besides the peaceful times many things remained the same about the Japanese social structure. Men and women still were very aware of honorable behavior, which held the basis for social culture. Although some similarities between the two were apparent, the more interesting seem to be the ways in which women were observed to display honorable behavior. The seemingly confined life of a women was very basic yet very strict in conduct. While men presented the strength of the household outside women held up the integrity of the house from within.…

    • 1189 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Intro: Although the big empires, Europe and Japan were really successful feudalist empires and both had some similarities and differences during the 9th to 13th century, which made them unique empires in the world. Both of the empires have a similar concept of elite warriors, different treatment of women during the post-classical era, and a similar political structure of a hereditary caste system, which were the main reasons they became successful empires.…

    • 645 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The remedy that was proposed for this was allowing the barons to seize all the…

    • 677 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays