Sand Creek The Morning After Summary

The passage, “Sand Creek the Morning After” by M. Annette James, begins with the author sending us to 1989 at a reminiscent and joyous ceremony. The ceremony was at the University of Colorado’s Boulder campus in celebration of the renaming of Nicholas Hall. James directs us to this ceremony in order for her to introduce us to the significance of this event. Who was David Nicholas, and why was his name wanted off that dormitory? To the majority, Nicholas was considered a successful businessman and “hero” who made an extensive trip to ensure the university at Boulder would not be built to the south at Canon City. The university was so essential because it was a huge influence in Boulder’s development. As time went on Nicholas gained power and
After the fact, Nicholas had the audacity to deny his horrendous actions in the massacre. In fact, he tried to lionize his activities by having called it a fair battle. Evidence proved otherwise, and he was actually a part of the massacre of woman, children, and old men. In spite of the fact that there was proof to clarify this event was a massacre of the Cheyenne people, it wasn’t recognized as severe as other genocides like it. James began to list the numerous amounts of genocides, like the Arminian genocide and the Holocaust, to showcase that the Sand Creek massacre was of equal equivalence.
James responded to a counter idea that even though Nicholas participated in Sand Creek, he was overall a good man and accomplished a lot. She demolished that claim by stating even Hitler had a huge part in the creation of the Volkswagen and rocketry and Albert Speer was an amazing architect. Nevertheless, the point was did the “good things” about these men change the way they are perceived in history today? The answer is no, they are still remembered for the horrific acts they committed. Therefore, James suggest that the massacre of Sand Creek shouldn’t be treated any