Sanger's Contraception

Sanger did not specify in her description of various preventative methods because if she writes the name of contraceptives in 1920 her book won’t be in the market for people to read. Furthermore, she does not want to violate the federal law. On the other hand, recently senate has passed a bill regarding “ NDUS sex ed program” that no government money would be invested in sex education in any institution of North Dakota. In order to avoid teen pregnancy NDUS was offering a sex ed program, but seem like it due to state rule there would not be any further step to educated teen about contraption (Think Progress). Looking at today’s situation there is still opposition on abortion and sex ed, but thinking about the time period she writes this book
In order to avoid these situations she considers the fact women will get information from neighbors, friends, and family to prevent pregnancy. This problem produces a large number of trust and distrust. As long, as women become an independent and desire their right to know about birth control with the physician. There will be more research and experiment will be done and medical field will have enough information on contraception and less harm. In the other hand, not everybody agrees with Sanger’s perception as well as, Sanger is not happy with decision made by church and state. She thinks church and states does not apply real life based situation. In other word church does not trust in the scientific method for birth control. For example, like Darwinism theory of evolution, teacher from Tennessee in 1925 was ban from teaching evolution because other believed that human being was divine creation of god rather than descendant from animals (The New Yorks Times). Church believed in the eyes of god everybody is equal, disease and poverty will strike and pass by if people followed the church activities they will overcome by their