The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002Introduction2001-2002 was marked by the Arthur Andersen accounting scandal and the collapse of Enron and WorldCom. Corporate reforms were demanded by the government, the investors and the American public to prevent similar future occurrences. Viewed to be largely a result of failed or poor governance, insufficient disclosure practices, and a lack of satisfactory internal controls, in 2002 George W. Bush signed into law the Sarbanes-Oxley Act that became effective on July 30, 2002. Congress was seeking to set standards and guarantee the accuracy of financial reports.
Viewed as the most significant change to securities laws since the 1934 the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (also known as SARBOX or SOX) sought to address the public concerns through making corporate board members responsible for company accounting statements, it redefines the relationships between corporations and their auditors, and it restructured the internal audit systems of public corporations. The SOX has redefined the corporate accounting world since it was implemented by adopting tough new provisions intended to deter and punish corporate and accounting fraud and corruption, threatening severe penalties for wrongdoers, and protecting the interest of workers and shareholders.
Background on the Sarbanes-Oxley ActThe Sarbanes-Oxley Act was named after co-creators Senator Paul Sarbanes of Maryland and Representative Michael Oxley of Ohio. It was passed by congress in an attempt to restore confidence in American corporations after the multi-billion dollar scandals at Enron and WorldCom as mention above. The Act:•Creates a Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB), to enforce professional standards, ethics, and competence for the accounting profession;•Strengthens the independence of firms that audit public companies;•Increases corporate responsibility and usefulness of corporate financial disclosure;•Increases penalties for corporate wrongdoing;•Protects the objectivity
Viewed as the most significant change to securities laws since the 1934 the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (also known as SARBOX or SOX) sought to address the public concerns through making corporate board members responsible for company accounting statements, it redefines the relationships between corporations and their auditors, and it restructured the internal audit systems of public corporations. The SOX has redefined the corporate accounting world since it was implemented by adopting tough new provisions intended to deter and punish corporate and accounting fraud and corruption, threatening severe penalties for wrongdoers, and protecting the interest of workers and shareholders.
Background on the Sarbanes-Oxley ActThe Sarbanes-Oxley Act was named after co-creators Senator Paul Sarbanes of Maryland and Representative Michael Oxley of Ohio. It was passed by congress in an attempt to restore confidence in American corporations after the multi-billion dollar scandals at Enron and WorldCom as mention above. The Act:•Creates a Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB), to enforce professional standards, ethics, and competence for the accounting profession;•Strengthens the independence of firms that audit public companies;•Increases corporate responsibility and usefulness of corporate financial disclosure;•Increases penalties for corporate wrongdoing;•Protects the objectivity
Bibliography: http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/business/1809266.stm. February 8, 2002. December 13, 2004. Baseline. "Does Honesty Pay Off?; Conventional wisdom says there 's no financial return inmeeting the fraud-fighting requirements of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act." October 1, 2003. www.ziffdavis.comBumgardner, Larry. "Reforming Corporate America: How does the Sarbanes-Oxley Act impactAmerican business?" Graziadio Business Report. Vol. 6, no. 1, 2003. Business Wire. "Rep. Michael Oxley Cites Restoration of Investor Confidence as the Legacy ofthe Sarbanes-Oxley Act." Columbus Ohio March 30, 2004. http://cowles.econ.yale.edu/behfin/. April 15, 2005. Donaldson, William H. "Impact of Sarbanes-Oxley Act." Capital Hill Hearing Testimony beforethe Committee on House Financial Services. April 21, 2005. The Economist. "Sarbanes-Oxley: A price worth paying?" The Economist. May 19, 2005. The Economist. "WorldCom. Another cowboy bites the dust." July 27, 2002. Field, Alan M. "Adding tough new teeth; The Sarbanes-Oxley Act places new demands onglobal traders." Journal of Commerce. Special Report2; pg. 54. June 14, 2004. Financial Executives International (FEI). "Sarbanes-Oxley Compliance Costs ExceedEstimates." http://www.fei.org/news/press.cfm. March 21, 2005. Higgins, Dan. "Small firm tries reverse stock split to escape Sarbanes-Oxley burden."Chattanooga Times Free Press. April 10, 2005. March 21, 2005. McDermott, Will & Emery. "Two Years Later - A Recap of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002and Related SEC Rulemaking." Mondaq Business Briefing. September 9, 2004. December 8, 2004. National Post. "Help firms store five years of e-mail - and strike gold: Technology servicescompanies profit from Sarbanes-Oxley." Financial Post Investing National Edition. November24, 2004. Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB). "Our Mission."http://www.pcaobus.org/PCAOB. "PCAOD Issues Guidance on Audits of Internal Control."http://www.pcaobus.org/News_and_Events/News/2005/05-16.asp. May 16, 2005. PCAOB. "Staff Statement on Management 's Report on Internal Control Over FinancialReporting." http://www.sec.gov/info/accountants/stafficreporting.htm. March 9, 2005. NY (printed in Singapore). McGraw Hill. 366-7. 2005. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). "Advisory Committee on Smaller PublicCompanies." http://www.sec.gov/info/smallbus/acspc.shtml May 25, 2005. SEC. "Final Rule: Strengthening the Commission 's Requirements Regarding AuditorIndependence." http://www.sec.gov/rules/final/33-8183.htm. March 27, 2005.