We analyze a randomized experiment in which 14,000 tax filers in H&R Block offices in St. Louis received matches of zero, 20 percent, or 50 percent of IRA contributions. Take-up rates were 3 percent, 8 percent, and 14 percent, respectively. Among contributors, contributions, excluding the match, averaged $765 in the control group and $1100 in the match groups. Taxpayer responses to similar incentives in the Saver’s Credit are much smaller. Taxpayers did not game the experiment by receiving a match and strategically withdrawing funds. Tax professionals significantly influenced contribution choices. These results suggest that both incentives and information affect behavior.
I. INTRODUCTION Many low- and middle-income American families save little for retirement or for other purposes. Families with income below $40,000 are unlikely to participate in employer-provided pensions or Individual Retirement Arrangements (IRAs) and in 2001 had just $2,200 in median net financial wealth outside of retirement accounts.1 Researchers and policy-makers have long considered ways to raise saving among these families. The conventional
We thank H&R Block for the collaboration and resources it has devoted to this experiment. We gratefully acknowledge the help and contributions of the H&R Block team led by Bernie Wilson and including Mary Beth Granger, Scott McBride, John McDonald, Andrew Olson, Mitchell Powers, Arijit Roy, Doris Seyl, John Thompson, Kenneth White, and Sabrina Wiewel, as well as the district and office managers and the 600 tax professionals who implemented this experiment in St. Louis. We also thank Marc Ferguson (Onesta Software), Yvette Ruiz (YMR), John Marinovich (Group 1), and Laura Bos and Bo Harmon (The Retirement Security Project) for their assistance. We gratefully acknowledge support from the
References: Bernheim, B. Douglas, “Taxation and Saving,” in Alan Auerbach and Martin Feldstein, eds., Handbook of Public Economics, Vol. 3 (Amsterdam: NorthHolland, 2003), pp. 1173–1249. Bertrand, Marianne, Dean Karlan, Sendhil Mullainathan, Eldar Shafir, and Jonathan Zinman, “What’s Psychology Worth? A Field Experiment in the Consumer Credit Market,” NBER Working Paper No. 11892, December 2005. Beverly, Sondra, Daniel Schneider, and Peter Tufano, “Splitting Tax Refunds and Building Savings: An Empirical Test,” Working Paper, Harvard Business School, 2005. Boshara, Ray, “Individual Development Accounts: Policies to Build Savings and Assets for the Poor,” Brookings Institution Policy Brief: Welfare Reform and Beyond No. 32, March 2005. Burman, Leonard E., William G. Gale, Matthew Hall, and Peter R. Orszag, “Distributional Effects of Defined Contribution Plans and Individual Retirement Arrangements,” National Tax Journal, LVII (2004), 671–701. Choi, James J., David Laibson, and Brigitte C. Madrian, “Plan Design and 401(k) Saving Outcomes,” NBER Working Paper No. 10486, May 2004. Choi, James J., David Laibson, and Brigitte C. Madrian, “$100 Bills on the Sidewalk: Suboptimal Saving in 401(k) Plans,” NBER Working Paper No. 11554, August 2005. Duflo, Esther, William Gale, Jeffrey Liebman, Peter Orszag, and Emmanuel Saez, “Saving Incentives for Low- and Middle-Income Families: Evidence from a Field Experiment with H&R Block,” NBER Working Paper No. 11680, October 2005. Duflo, Esther, and Emmanuel Saez, “The Role of Information and Social Interactions in Retirement Plan Decisions: Evidence from a Randomized Experiment,” Quarterly Journal of Economics, CXVIII (2003), 815– 842. Engelhardt, Gary V., and Anil Kumar, “Employer Matching and 401(k) Saving: 17. Glaeser [2005] notes there is no guarantee that the government will act in the best interest of imperfectly informed individuals. Liebman and Zeckhauser [2004] discuss cases where the government can take advantage of tax filer ignorance to raise social welfare. 1346 QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS Evidence from the Health and Retirement Study,” Center for Retirement Research Working Paper 2004-18, Boston College, 2004. Engen, Eric M., William G. Gale, and John Karl Scholz, “The Illusory Effects of Saving Incentives on Saving,” Journal of Economic Perspectives, X (1996), 113–138. Even, William E., and David A. MacPherson, “The Effects of Employer Matching in 401(k) Plans,” Industrial Relations, XLIV (2005), 525–549. Gale, William G., J. Mark Iwry, and Peter R. Orszag, “The Saver’s Credit: Expanding Retirement Savings for Middle-and Lower-Income Americans,” Retirement Security Project Policy Brief No. 2005-2, 2005. General Accounting Office, “401(k) Pension Plans: Loan Provisions Enhance Participation But May Affect Income Security for Some,” GAO/HEHS-98-5, 1997. Glaeser, Edward L., “Paternalism and Psychology,” NBER Working Paper No. 11789, 2005. Huberman, Gur, Sheena S. Iyengar, and Wei Jiang, “Defined Contribution Pension Plans: Determinants of Participation and Contribution Rates,” Columbia Business School, 2004. Koenig, Gary, and Robert Harvey, “Utilization of the Saver’s Credit: An Analysis of the First Year,” Joint Committee on Taxation, 2005. Kusko, Andrea, James M. Poterba, and David W. Wilcox, “Employee Decisions with Respect to 401(k) Plans: Evidence from Individual-Level Data,” in Olivia Mitchell and Sylvester Schaefer, eds., Living with Defined Contribution Pensions: Remaking Responsibility for Retirement (Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1998). Liebman, Jeffrey, and Richard Zeckhauser, “Schmeduling,” Harvard University, 2004. Madrian, Brigitte, and Dennis F. Shea, “The Power of Suggestion: Inertia in 401(k) Participation and Savings Behavior,” Quarterly Journal of Economics, CXVI (2001), 1149 –1187. Mills, Gregory, William G. Gale, and Rhiannon Patterson, “Effects of Individual Development Accounts on Household Saving Behavior: Evidence from a Controlled Experiment,” Abt Associates and the Brookings Institution, 2005. Papke, Leslie E., “Participation in and Contributions to 401k Pension Plans: Evidence from Plan Data,” Journal of Human Resources, XXX (1995), 311–325. Papke, Leslie E., and James M. Poterba, “Survey Evidence on Employer Match Rates and Employee Saving Behavior in 401(k) Plans,” Economics Letters, XLIX (1995), 313–317. Poterba, James M., Steven F. Venti, and David A. Wise, “How Retirement Saving Programs Increase Saving,” Journal of Economic Perspectives, X (1996), 91–112. Sherraden, Michael, Assets and the Poor: A New American Welfare Policy (Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe, Inc, 1991). Thaler, Richard, and Shlomo Benartzi, “Save More Tomorrow: Using Behavioral Economics to Increase Employee Saving,” Journal of Political Economy, CXII (2004), S164 –S187.